Jump to content

hbgoo1975

Members
  • Posts

    1,053
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hbgoo1975

  1. Here is how it would look if the white uniform had more orange. Sorry for the double post.
  2. Can you do that with the helmet having a white facemask then?
  3. Looks like Goodell might keep the Rams in St.Louis. SMH.....
  4. The piping was fixed in a patch last year. And the helmet logo was moved higher up the shell (it was way too low in these screenshots). But pretty embarrassing nonetheless. The jerseys in reality should have none of that striping at all!
  5. And the Rams are staying put. LA has nothing.
  6. I don't see an NFL team in Los Angeles AFTER next year! There are more people and groups who rally against having the NFL in LA! They might be content with some meaningless form of entertainment show than the NFL!
  7. I don't see LA having an NFL team, so they are stuck with the LA KISS losing for now.
  8. It's obvious that there won't be a team in LA, not just 2015, maybe for good! No owner in the NFL wants to move their team to LA!
  9. Now I know what the NFL stood for 20 years ago, Not For Los Angeles.
  10. Los Angeles has a new soccer club coming because SOCCER is a big deal. By the way, The Rams and Raiders may not come and we won't have NFL football until the world ends!!
  11. Is there a possibility that Kroenke still wants a third MLS team there if we DON'T get the Rams?
  12. All the LA teams are hell bent in keeping their franchises, just as the NFL doesn't want to move their teams in LA. That includes the stupid Chivas USA! Having three MLS teams in LA is like the Kardsahian sisters. No wonder Stan Kroenke is senile!
  13. We're not getting the Rams or any other team. By the time LA gets a team, they won't wear helmets anymore! Why does the MLS need another team in LA when we have two already? We're stuck with the LA Kiss now who will go 0-16!
  14. The difference is that there aren't teams moving other places right now, so it works. Still, I'm not sure what's true. I think it's a combo of a few things, but I'm not sure how much of what. • The owners of the teams in an unstable situation (Rams, Raiders, Chargers, and Jags) have shown no desire to move to LA or anywhere else and in some cases have said as much. • The league is not fully satisfied with the stadium options in LA and is still pursuing a better deal. • The league may not want any team to move to LA, instead using it as leverage for the teams in the current homes and eventually choosing the expansion route. So we could have a new team with ugly puke uniforms and neon colors? I hope we have an expansion team with brighter blue or emerald or midnight green helmets! None of this two tone crap with Jacksonville!
  15. And LA gets a rugby team no one cares about? Is that Los Angeles' future?! Like KISS' football team is relevant to LA. I guess we're stuck with the XFL Championship. Maybe every team is trying to screw LA out of the NFL.
  16. If we don't get an NFL team, the stupid soccer team called the Chivas may have a stake at Hollywood Park center for some team sponsored store or something. And the city's fans will still be on the Cowboys payroll. And I do not mean the Boys are moving!
  17. I'm really kidding but will LA be destroyed before they ever get an NFL team?
  18. If they are staying in Glendale, they should be the Arizona Coyotes because it makes better sense.
  19. If the Coyotes were to stay, Bettman would say something irrelevant as The Coyotes are Phoenix. And we would like to have a Stanley Cup in Phoenix. Even though they play away form Phoenix. I wonder if they will ever become the Arizona Coyotes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.