AnPheitseog

I hate the reasoning behind it, but the white pads just look a whole lot better to my eyes. The reasoning is awful of course.

Welp... Buffalo NY Jets Pittsburgh Philadelphia Dallas Minnesota Atlanta Miami New Orleans Carolina Cleveland San Francisco Kansas City Arizona Chicago Las Vegas

It was the smart move honestly. Way less backlash now if they add an ad down the line, than moving the patch to make room for the ad.

Jacksonville Tampa Bay Las Vegas Indianapolis Washington Detroit Buffalo Seattle Pittsburgh Kansas City Green Bay Philadelphia San Francisco

There's a huge difference between the 1900s and 2000s in terms of ease. If i'm luck enough to live into the 2100s then it'll revert. not until then.

I still think people going 20-23 sound weird. It's Two thousand twenty three, thank you very much. (or, how i actually prefer it, deux milles vignt-trois)

Kansas City Baltimore Atlanta Minnesota Seattle Cleveland Miami Jacksonville Houston New England Arizona Philadelphia Detroit Buffalo Dallas

Both teams are looking as they should

So (tagging @ruttep as well), the penguins third already has an ad patch. It's not exactly the same as as the rangers, but it's close

Washington Buffalo New England Tennessee Pittsburgh Detroit Houston Miami Arizona Philadelphia NY Jets Kansas City Dallas Green Bay

Tough week, especially considering going .500 is worst week Green Bay Atlanta Indianapolis Cleveland Minnesota Cincinnati Tampa Buffalo Denver Philadelphia Pittsburgh LA Chargers San Francisco Dallas Kansas City Seattle

Combo of: Better play Fan Friendly Rules Quick Start Penguins Early exit Cutch Opening weekend was close to sellouts, if not sold out. But evened out across, that's still too much. Perhaps the new schedule also factored in, with games against the yankees or red sox(i forget which were at PNC).

Pirates growth is also because McCutchen is back. even with that, him alone doesnt contribute to 3800 MORE per game.

Just buy Bill Henderson's book. Very easy and comprehensive. MLB Gameworn Guides

I've used the site on Chrome on Windows 11(homebuilt desktop with AMD 5 processor, samsung SSD, ASUS mobo) without that issue.

San Francisco Atlanta Minnesota Green Bay Houston Miami Tennessee Buffalo Baltimore NY Jets Carolina Kansas City Dallas Pittsburgh Philadelphia LA Rams

Philadelphia Cincinnati Seattle Houston Tampa Bay Kansas City Green Bay Buffalo LA Chargers San Francisco Arizona NY Jets Washington Miami Carolina Pittsburgh

It works because it's in the perfect colour balance for the Bills. They're a blue primary team(jersey or pants are blue), followed by white(pants/jersey) and then red as a third colour(socks, the smallest part of the uniform)

I like the blue pants. The blue pants are honestly not the problem. Bills need to bring back red socks full time. Home and road. Home: Blue jersey, white pants, red socks. Away White jersey, blue pants, red socks. Absent red socks though, fully agree. and blue pants/jersey should never happen

Will I make all 19 weeks and playoffs this year? Who knows, but lets start and try Kansas City Cincinnati Baltimore Minnesota Carolina Arizona Jacksonville Pittsburgh Tennessee Las Vegas Philadelphia LA Rams Miami Green Bay NY Giants Buffalo

They're killing the PHF because the people that bought it out hate and want to kil it and pretend that it never existed. I both want womens hockey to florish and am 100% bitter at how this second professional league came into existance.

So, I'm three years behind the ball BUT New York State updated their flag as of the 2021 Budget. NYS added E Pluribus Unum as a second motto, which then added it to the coast of arms and by extension the flag and seal. New Old

Fanatics owns Mitchell and Ness. For a throwback classic themed game, using the MN brand makes sense for fanatics

So, it's very likely that Tampa. COULD have kept it, but they wanted to kill off the road grey and they just justified it because of no city connect.

I'm not going to source this, but going to respond of memory so I'll take corrections as needed. The primary use of sliding pits in MLB were due to multipurpose stadiums, where MLB and NFL teams(soccer was yet to be a force in the US at the start) would share a stadium and be awful for both. These stadiums also used artifical turf, rather than grass, to make the maintence easier. Sliding pits made it so the turnover waseasier, because you only had a little bit of dirt to remove as compared to a full infield, while keeping the saftey for the players. The Blue Jays, as you noted, were the last to have them. This was due to the Toronto Arognauts of the CFL playing at Rogers Centre as well(In fact, my first even at Rogers Centre was an Argos game in 2013, not a Blue Jays game). Once they kicked the Argos out and started renovations, they made it into a baseball only facility with still artifical turf but a full infield. So, the history of the sliding pits in MLB follows the history of multipurpose stadiums in MLB due to ease of turnover. If you look at the exceptions, the stadium in Oakland hosted both the Raiders and the A's. However, they still had a full infield and the Raiders played on dirt for the beginning parts of their season and it was beautiful. They are not the only ones to do so, and I believe we have a thread here dedicated to that glory. There are also teams in Japan that use the sliding pits now, even without a near. Yokohama Stadium, home of my Yokohama DeNA Baystars, has a full turf field and sliding pits. You also still see it at the collegiate level, with Pitt doing the same despite it being a full park.