DCarp1231

They sell it at Whole Foods, 7-11, Sheetz, and GetGo (Giant Eagle Fuel Service)

I’d say it makes sense to use cans. It reduces plastic waste. Which a lot of their marketing is centered around. I personally find it better tasting than other leading water brands. Yes, not all water tastes the same.

Sure, it’s just water, but boy is it some high quality H2O.

I remember seeing a graphic on a pregame show for Washington that had a burgundy helmet with white/gold/white stripes and a white facemask. It actually looked decent. I’ve tried looking for it again, but can’t seem to find it anywhere.

I’d argue they have roughly the same amount of gold/yellow as Washington- Now, I’m not saying a yellow facemask would help the Minnesota uniforms, but it’s certainly justified when you compare it to a team who also uses the same color in a similar manner. (Personally, I’d rather have Washington use a gray facemask)

Brown > White > Gray

I can agree on the Bears and Broncos. I wouldn’t expect them to try anything drastic like orange facemasks

Not the best, but yeah sure it works and the same goes for white

Y’all really think this- looks better than this? IMO, anytime a helmet and facemask are the same color (outside of white and black), it looks very cheap.

Nevermind. BBTV beat me to it

I’m still of the opinion that the Raiders should’ve made the switch to black facemasks upon their arrival in Las Vegas

Remember this? At least with Washington, it’s just a throwback jersey worn once a year. Minnesota dealt with mismatched purples on a regular basis for 6 seasons.

I’d add a third team to that list. Washington

I really don’t see a problem with teams opting to use multiple different colored facemasks

Wait, the Bills white face mask thing was a joke? That’s cruel

I’m sure we’ve all done it at least a time or two. Maybe you liked it, maybe you hated it. You initially bought the product because the branding looked great in your eyes. No other motive. Here’s a few of mine-

@BBTV I’m not really familiar with McNabb’s accolades while in Philadelphia, but has he truly garnered the recognition of a retired number?

Full disclosure, I agree with you. However, it hasn’t stopped other non-Big 4 teams from adopting a name that isn’t Washington. As for the Big 4, two of the Washington teams have utilized a “DC” logo in some capacity

Unless it’s some incredibly unique name, a team is bound to choose something that already exists in the plane on sports identities. There will always be duplicates, copycats, etc.

You’re on to something. If only the Giants, Rangers, Cardinals, Jets, and Kings knew this information

Wolves work fine IMO too. It keeps the push by fans for Redwolves, but obviously doesn’t emphasize the Red part. You can still have a red wolf logo without a problem too.

I highly doubt they’d do it, but would it be worth it to just go by DC instead of Washington?

IIRC, when the team announced the temporary identity, they did it in a way as to not get fans too attached to it...