DCarp1231

6 minutes ago, CaliforniaGlowin said:

If only this were true for red and blue teams

All it takes is for one of those teams to commit to being a red-first team and set themselves apart.

I don’t get the whole “x team can’t do this because y team does it and they might look too much like z team”.

Especially when we have three teams in one division being blue heavy and two of those teams are having a dick measuring competition to see who deserves to own the rights to use a different shade of blue.

It’s all fun and games until someone says the Falcons should swap white for cream/tan

Reviving college football teams from this thread

There’s a happy medium somewhere in these

1 minute ago, HOOVER said:

And it sounds like it’s the league that would make them wait that long, which is a shame.  There should be an expedited process for new ownership situations.

I think you may have quoted the wrong reply

3 hours ago, VikWings said:

 

Can add Detroit to the backtracked list as well.

 

FWIW though the Falcons, Chargers, Rams, Patriots, Cardinals and Commies are all too soon to backtrack. 2024 will be year 5 for ATL, NE, and the LA teams, year 3 for Wash and year 2 for ARZ.

 

(Titans have also kept theirs)

Even if Washington wanted to change considering new ownership wipes out the 5 year requirement, it still takes (allegedly) 18-24 months to complete the process. We’d be looking at changing after year 4 if we’re fortunate enough to even think Josh Harris & Co. made it a top priority in year 1.

2 hours ago, HOOVER said:

And just to add on to this silly concept, all Atlanta would have to do for their NikeSpeak presentation is to show these photos:

I can hear the narrator in the unveiling video now…
 

*pictures and clips of Deion* “The gold standard, woven deep into the fabric of ATL culture… worn with pride.” *flashes gold accents on the uniform* *player model shows off grills and it’s Kirk Cousins*

I like the idea of adding gold into the Falcons set, but I also like the idea of silver/grey pants. Is there room for both?

8 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said:

Why should you hate it?

The black being used so prominently. It oddly looks good here and reminds me a little bit of Iowa State mixed with Minnesota.

(It’s well done, apologies for not saying that at first)

2 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said:

I should hate this, but I don’t?

Never forget where we came from

Utah Angels of Salt Lake City

They’ll never be you 

2 minutes ago, monkeypower said:

Not to make this thread even hotter with nothing new, what's everyone's thoughts on this logo that came with the new Jets set of logos?

 

 

I want to like it and I think it's clever but it might just be too minimalist?

No, it’s perfect and makes sense as a secondary logo. In fact, the jet by itself would be a good logo to put on the helmet.

The gold-to-black gradient helmet made no sense for Jacksonville. If they insisted on the effect, why not teal-to-black to mimick the Jaguar coming out of tall grass? And why so much gradient anyway?

10 minutes ago, MCM0313 said:

Bring back 1997-2002 set but with current helmet and logo. Make pant stripes narrower. Add red alt jersey in the same style. Bartkowski-era red-helmet, red-jersey throwback. Only ever wear silver-grey pants with all combos. Done. 

It’s foolish to ever think a team will only ever wear one set of pants. Raiders are the only holdout.

So, Atlanta is definitely getting a redesign after this season, right? RIGHT?

It wouldn’t surprise me if the blue pants have a solid white stripe

The only acceptable way to put a WCF patch on the new set is above the player nameplate.

Also, give us blue facemasks.

Curiosity may just kill me, but options I’d like to see for the Jets-

• Green/White/Green/Black

• Green/Green/Green/Black

• Green/Green/White/Black

• Green/Black/White/Black

Options we’ll get-

• Green/White/Black/Black

• Green/White/Green/Green

• Green/Green/White/White

I didn’t mind the previous Jets set. They just did stupid things with it.

It looks like when State Farm changed from actual Jake from State Farm to that bum ass actor Jake from State Farm

29 minutes ago, tBBP said:

The Jags just updated their Facebook cover photo...

 

 

...Either this is the troll job of the century, or they just told us straight up exactly what throwback uniforms they plan on wearing.

 

(And inside of two years, I HOPE they come back ad perma-primaries...)

It won’t be a true throwback if the right sleeve Nike logo isn’t flipped 

9 minutes ago, HOOVER said:

Agree.  This is the start of at least a year's worth of speculation of them adding a White helmet and Namath throwbacks.  

Still, I wonder if they want to let the Sack Exchange return unis settle in for awhile before doing that.  Let the fans get accustomed to them before throwing a Namath set back in the mix.  If they do it now, you'd have a contingent of Jets fans saying the team should go back to them permanently.  

Give it 3-5 years and then bring them back.

Until they bring back the Titans of New York