Dynasty

That makes little sense to me. Inconsistency in terms of the colors of the stripes? I don't see a huge issue with that. Teams have interchanged with them before (even the Lions themselves), plus the striping is all the same in design. I'll take different colored stripes (if the design is consistent) over no stripes at all.

The striping reference to the Ford Mustang is probably my favorite part of all of this. Brilliant move there. I don't know what is preventing them from pairing the silver pants with the white jerseys. I also don't know what is preventing them from putting striping on all the pants. It bothered me with the previous set and it will bother me again with this one. For whatever reason, I just had a huge hunch that this was going to be the route the Lions would go and damn is it the right one. A solid A for me.

I guess it's fine as a secondary, but maybe a little unnecessary. The jet works as a nice subtle touch to the primary script logo, but by itself it's too minor and abstract to act as its own logo. I don't know how many people would be able to think and say, "oh, that's totally suppose to be a jet plane."

Lol Washington had no business being in the playoffs. Though if it extends Ovechkin's opportunities at more goals then count me in. Toronto against Boston might as well be chalk. The Leafs can never beat the Bruins in the playoffs.

The old one had a lot of detail they had to work with in terms of printing and distribution. The new one isn't as good, but I get why they did it.

I've said it before, the previous uniforms were 2015 Browns-esque. I wouldn't have directly went with the 1980's throwback route however, but these don't look bad by any means. Very solid.

The Bucks could've intentionally lost to avoid playing Miami or Philadelphia early. Not that it would do much given they would more than likely play them anyway if they themselves come out of the first round. It doesn't take away that this season has been a relative disaster for Milwaukee. They've been trying to do everything they can to keep Giannis from bolting on them when he has the chance. It's not going to end well.

Yeah, I thought 1990 UNLV and 2009 North Carolina were great. This team may very well be the greatest ever, or are definitely at least in that discussion.

Wasn't Bueckers suppose to be the generational all-time great that Clark became? Not trying to downplay how great of a player she is or anything because she's still tremendous and the injuries did knock here down a peg for a season or two. Bueckers still has a chance to do what Clark wasn't able to do next season, but obviously Dawn Staley and that juggernaut of a SC team isn't going anywhere. Not yet. They need to keep it up and win about four more titles minimum to get that label.

I think it's pretty telling that many people initially (and still did) picked South Carolina over the field. There really wasn't a single school in this tournament that was beating them, as great as Caitlin Clark was. Simply keeping within ten points against the Gamecocks was a daunting task in of itself. I have to say though, this was probably the greatest coaching performance I've ever seen in college sports. Losing your entire starting lineup to the draft last season and Dawn Staley still delivered. Absolute legend.

I didn't even know they did rings for lesser bowl games.

I just saw that he was there for 40 years(!). We have people getting laid off on more than an occasion but this old guy can remain an executive for up to four decades? And he was also apparently not well-liked at ESPN either, which sounds like an understatement.

The Texans (should) be pretty dangerous next season. Both Nico Collins and Tank Dell are already serious deep threats and although I think Stefon Diggs is somewhat overrated, he can be good with deep passes as well. Amazing to see this team's expectations now compared to just two years ago. What an absolute failure the Bills have been so far in the Josh Allen era. They've been the greatest underachievers since the Phillip Rivers era Chargers. They technically still have a chance to make a difference because of their quarterback, but trading your top wideout to another AFC team is gonna hurt. And I bet Miami still won't get past them.

It's the unfortunate circumstances of the double standard. When she made that gesture last year, I just knew people were going to find a way to bash her for it. It's worth noting that Clark was doing roughly the same thing in her previous games during that tournament though. Reese made a comment during her postgame last year about trying to represent all of the girls out there who experience the disparity of racism and stereotyping, and that made me like her even more. I hope she has a great career in the WNBA.

Regardless of how much further they go, I'm happy that Caitlin Clark and Iowa were able to get their revenge against LSU. It would've been so lame to see her end her college career to that team.

I didn't think the removal of white trim would make a difference, but I think the Yankees really are better without it. It's subtle in the eyes of other people, but I immediately noticed it when seeing highlights.

I guess the sport of basketball is just easy for Dan Hurley and co.. I know they were really good last year, but Jesus, this is women's level dominance.

The black alternates are probably the ones I like the most from their update. Also, man are those hats bright. It's like they're made of a metallic material. It will be different when they play in home games because of their park though.

I think a lot of the black and gold schools, particularly Colorado and Idaho, list gold and silver as their main colors, but use black and gold for the athletic programs. There is also the case of UCLA, mainly with their shades of gold. According to TruColor, the athletic color (#FSA900) is slightly different from the institution color (#FFD100). However, there is the fact that the football team wears a completely different gold from the rest of the program.

There is talk around Calipari, but what about Izzo? What has Michigan State done in the past several years? They haven't been an elite program for quite a while and just seem to be an easy chalk for early-to-mid tournament exits. Their last title was 2000.

I keep hearing the "white helmet" assertion being mentioned with the Broncos new uniforms and it's not just annoying, but I almost feel closer to believing it, even without actual clear evidence. Also, five changing uniforms?

The road uniforms don't have the TC monogram. It's the state logo that the home uniform has. Unless you are referring to the navy alternates, which do have the TC monogram.

The M Star is a cool logo. Although, it's important to have one cohesive logo used for both home and away caps because it helps the team have something that defines them and gives them an identifiable mark. With that... I don't think the Twins should use it interchangeably with the TC monogram, but it can be a good option as an alternate.

I was just thinking about this. It's actually wild at how talented they were during the 2010's yet had little to show for it. Since that Super Bowl against Green Bay to now, they have just three playoff wins... against AJ McCarron, Matt Moore, and Alex Smith. They really have underachieved and it kind of reminds me of the Saints during that same span. After years of falling short, it just felt like the Brees/Payton era already accomplished what they could and it just had to end. I am wondering if it's the same way for Tomlin and the Steelers. I don't think he can replicate the Super Bowl contending days of the late 2000's, but will he ever sniff the consistent 11-12 win seasons from the past decade?

I like that they're at least keeping that logo particularly in San Diego. The way I view it, the logo belongs to the city because of its history there and it would be a little weird to see it used within a rival city.