MCM0313

Three-tone green? No, they wouldn’t have ended up looking good, but I would like to see somebody do that again. The color combo worked for the Bucks back in the day.

As the President pauses from his reading of “My Pet G.O.A.T.”, a charming tale about a teenaged Tom Brady’s internship at a petting zoo.

Coming 2025: all 32 teams will have a “Tanya Snyder Edition” alternate, designed by the wife of the former Washington owner. They will be obligated to wear the alts in Thursday night contests. The nickname “Tanya Rush” is picking up speed.

If the jersey were red, it would pretty much be a Buckeyes ripoff.

I just realized I reacted to this post while trying to it. Personally I would rather ATL stay with a black helmet, but your design is still a definite improvement on what they are actually wearing. I share the concerns of the poster who found it too similar to Tampa’s set though. I think it looks like the Buccaneers mixed with one of the black alts my Ohio State Buckeyes have periodically worn.

If they come out with a color-swapped brown helmet to go with their Diarrhea Runs - er, Color Rush head-to-toe brown set, I would imagine their fanbase would react in much the same way they did to the 2015 changes. It was less than a decade ago, Browns. Do you really forget that quickly?

IMO that look was too unbalanced in favor of the black. Granted, that road set is tilted a bit in favor of the red, but with the black helmet and number outline and NOB and the multicolored pant stripes, it has always worked for me. The differences in color emphasis between the home and road sets make for a very balanced set overall, kind of like what the Giants have done for the past twenty-plus years, or the Texans pre-2009 (when they stopped wearing red socks on the road).

That would be offensive to Congresspeople.

The best option has been staring them in the face for nearly two decades. Potomac. Drainage. Basin. Indigenous. Persons.

It’s a filter on the boards. As far as I know it’s automatic. It changes any instances of the franchise’s post-Braves, pre-2020 name to their current one. I don’t find it necessary but it’s in accordance with site policy around controversial topics.

I get the feeling that they have one, and their current set is generally popular with their fans. But you are one of their fans; what have you heard others say?

They say that too many cooks will spoil the broth; honey, I think that’s not true. Well, maybe too many cooks will spoil the broth, but they’ll fill our hearts with so much, so much love!

In my proposal they could technically have two pairs of pants…they’d just both be grey. For the main three jerseys they could simplify the stripes to Braisher stripes. Then they could wear the more complex (and historically accurate) stripes with the throwback.

There’s no Dick involved, but anybody remember Fair Hooker?

Oh, that’s just too perfect!

Gotcha. Man, I hope the main set is decent. It has to be better than the way they wore the old set last year, right? The combo made me angry. It was like the designer got bored and quit halfway through.

Bring back 1997-2002 set but with current helmet and logo. Make pant stripes narrower. Add red alt jersey in the same style. Bartkowski-era red-helmet, red-jersey throwback. Only ever wear silver-grey pants with all combos. Done.

I’m sure the Barrys will have striped pants and no sleeve wordmark, but I just have a feeling they aren’t the main thing.

I’m just glad you didn’t say the gradient helmet. You’ve been a constructive contributor here and I would hate to see you perma-banned.

My requests would be simple: pants - white with teal jersey, teal with black jersey, either white or teal with white jersey. socks - black always

I also noted that as a possibility. The plain throwbacks are cool, but the Barry look is better IMO.

Well done, Broncos, you magnificent bastards. Not on the actual uniforms most likely, but on this nice little prank. They have already said they’re staying with Honolulu blue and silver, so if it’s a black uniform, it’s just an alt. Less than ideal to be sure, but honestly, probably better than that absolute garbage whiteout crap they kept pushing last year, and that wasn’t even an alt. I’m more intrigued by what looks like their Barry Sanders-era logo. Are they adding a ‘90s throwback in place of the plain Thanksgiving set? Simplifying their current logo to be more like its more distant ancestors? Just trying to hype some nostalgia in advance of the reveal?

I wish they had said something along the lines of “no, you little buttwagon, we won’t give you plain white socks, especially with white pants, because that looks like hot garbage and we want our uniform set to look good, and frankly you should be ashamed of yourself for even asking” but I suspect that might’ve been construed as poor customer service.

Really? One of the articles (mothership maybe?) specifically said the Jets would NOT have a third helmet this year.

Please, just once in the preseason and then never again. I wonder if Buhlahkay there wants to go to war? For what it’s worth, the brief, largely buried ESPN article has about two thousand likes. Most people (unlike Buhlahkay there) really enjoyed the combinations shown. I’m not on Twitter (which I refuse to call X). Could any of you go on there and refute his stupid request? Pretty please? Maybe something like “they’re the New York Jets, not the New York Ass”?