-
Posts
184 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by TheHydroPole
-
-
Just now, hawk36 said:
Yes, I'd say the eye for sure, and the upcurve on the tail and italicizing of the whole form are all what I think are "cookie cutter" aspects.
That just adds flow to the logo instead of just having it end sharply. Adds balance and an end in the visual hierarchy of the logo itself.
I strongly disagree with you, on a technical and objectively visual standpoint. But hey, this is the whole point of this thread.
- 3
-
Just now, hawk36 said:
I'd argue that a big problem with professional sports in general is that all the logos are looking too similar. Well rendered but homogeneous. Sure it could be refined a bit but I love that it looks authentic and not like every other new logo out there.
To be fair, the redesign kept most elements in place. The eye is the only part that is very "cookie cutter" from those "well rendered but homogeneous" logos.
-
1 minute ago, hawk36 said:
It's based on a traditional Pacific Northwest totem pole motif.
And that's great for a traditional Pacific Northwest totem pole and a team in the 70's, but for a professional football team in 2002/2016, blegh.
-
-
I don't follow football much, but most of those pants don't even match the jerseys. Of course that's more to do with fabrics, but you'd think they'd try and match them
-
On 10/17/2016 at 4:44 AM, dont care said:
Can y'all put who these people are?
My post is Owen Nolan
-
On 10/14/2016 at 5:06 PM, FGM13 said:
Wait... who is this?
That is Matt Martin.
-
This one always makes me giggle
Unpopular Opinions
in Sports Logo General Discussion
Posted
Ignore my Canadian ignorance, but does Tennessee have a lot of oil?