CATLogo1

Exactly. Officially speaking, the Baltimore Ravens were founded as an expansion franchise that began play in the 1996 NFL season. Meanwhile. the Cleveland Browns' history was temporarily suspended from 1996 through 1998, with the club rejoining the NFL prior to the start of the 1999 NFL season. This is all factual information, according to the 2021 Official NFL Record & Fact Book: 2021_NFL_Record_and_Fact_Book.pdf

Honestly, it feels like a huge swing and a miss by the Washington NFL team to apparently pick "Commanders" as its new permanent club name. We'll all have to wait until February 2 for the official reveal, as well as the accompanying explanation from Washington as to why they picked the name "Commanders", but it's disappointing that they couldn't resolve enough trademark issues with all relevant teams (such as Arkansas State University) that used the name "Red Wolves". Also, I'm preparing to be disappointed by the logo & uniform design reveal on February 2. I definitely feel like Washington's classic uniform design (the uniforms they wear now) are clean and timeless.

I know. I'm saying I wish that settlement agreement could be amended so that the history of the Seattle SuperSonics isn't shared with the Oklahoma City Thunder. It should be a situation where not only does Seattle get a new SuperSonics team and its related history and branding back, but that the Oklahoma City Thunder are treated like an expansion team that started in 2008.

Actually, wouldn't the easiest solution be to have a Charlotte/New Orleans type situation? What I mean by that is this: the NBA grants an expansion team to Seattle, names it the Seattle SuperSonics, and then the Professional Basketball Club LLC (the ownership group of the Oklahoma City Thunder) agrees to transfer the franchise history of the original SuperSonics back to the newly granted expansion team in Seattle.

THANK YOU! Honestly, this mockup looks so much better than what the Jacksonville Jaguars currently wear on the field.

Is there any way I could see full mockups of the Jacksonville Jaguars' uniforms w/the gold outlined numbers & teal & gold stripes down the side panels of the pants?

This version of the Jacksonville Jaguars' logo looks so much better without the multiple gold color shading and without the fur detailing on the spots. Someone should petition the Jaguars to make these changes to the logo

I love this! I still think that the Jacksonville Jaguars should reincorporate gold back into their uniforms, because I think the Jaguars should use teal and gold as their primary club colors, instead of teal and black. The reason why I think the Jaguars should use teal and gold is because gold just provides a better color contrast for teal than black does.

UGH! It better NOT be "Redtails"! That's such a garbage name! If that is the name, then I'm going to be rooting for this team to get its ass kicked by its opponent on a weekly basis. Personally, I don't know what's wrong with keeping "Washington Football Team" as the permanent name. However, since that's apparently not an option, I vote for "Redwolves".

@JayJaxon Thank you! I would love nothing more than to see the Diamond Uniform Database be restored. Keep these uniform concepts for the remaining Major League Baseball teams coming, please.

The more I think about it, the more I'm against pro sports teams retiring jersey numbers. All that does is in effect make it harder for teams to issue jersey numbers. All pro sports teams should just create a ring of honor. If a team were to retire all their available jersey numbers, then what happens? Total chaos.

Exactly. I agree. This is why I'm of the opinion that the NFL should not do away with its one helmet shell color rule. Nobody should ever have to see these particularly UGLY uniforms ever again. We don't need to see the Tampa Bay Buccaneers break out the Creamsicle Bucco Bruce uniforms. They weren't particularly easy to look at in the first place, and those uniforms will always be associated with the Buccaneers' early franchise struggles, when they started out 0-26 from 1976-1977.

This is much better, but part of me wants to know what the Jaguars helmet design would look like with a teal shell color & a gold color face mask.

He didn't hurt me. I was just worried I had offended him.

Does anyone know when the Cincinnati Bengals are scheduled to publicly unveil their new uniform designs? Has anyone heard or does anyone know?

Look man, I'm sorry if I pissed you off about the whole Denver Broncos orange jersey curse thing. Clearly, and logically speaking, there really isn't such a thing as a jersey color curse. Anyways, I was wondering if you would be so kind as to please create a Denver Broncos uniform concept that merges the cyberhorse with the club's old striping pattern used before 1997, but with white pants, and with navy blue as the predominant color? Please?

I mean, maybe the whole orange jersey curse thing is overblown. I would support this uniform concept should the Denver Broncos choose to go for a more traditional uniform look, except for the orange pants. I'm not a fan of orange pants.

Yes, I'm aware.

OK OK. I get your point. Again, jersey color did not matter that day for the Broncos against the 49ers in Super Bowl XXIV.

OK. I never said that, but I get your point. It honestly did not matter what jersey color the Denver Broncos wore in Super Bowl XXIV against the San Francisco 49ers; they weren't going to win that day.

Exactly! This proves my point: the Broncos chose to wear white in Super Bowl 50 because they knew that their win-loss record in the Super Bowl in orange prior to SB 50 was & still is 0-4. Yes, I'm aware that the Broncos lost in orange to 3 dynasties (the 1977 Dallas Cowboys, the 1987 Washington (Washington Football Team) & 1989 San Francisco 49ers), but they also WON Super Bowl XXXII in NAVY BLUE against the Green Bay Packers, who won Super Bowl XXXI the year before. That's why I'm a firm believer that the Broncos should switch back to NAVY BLUE as their primary home jersey color.

I mean, there's a reason WHY the Denver Broncos chose to wear WHITE jerseys as the designated HOME team in Super Bowl 50: The Orange Crush Curse: Why the Broncos Chose to Wear White in Super Bowl 50 | NFL - YouTube

I mean, part of it was the Broncos' talent on the field, but I think all Broncos fans know that we don't have success in the Super Bowl while wearing orange jerseys. I think it's a mixture of both the lack of talent on the field (and poor play vs. the competition) & also the orange jersey color, because no team has ever won a Super Bowl while wearing orange in the big game (the Broncos are the only team to wear orange on Super Sunday).

As a Denver Broncos fan, I support keeping the primary logo & wordmark logo introduced in 1997. However, I also would support a decision by the Broncos to switch their primary home jersey color from orange to navy blue. IMO, orange is a CURSED jersey color, as the Broncos' all-time win-loss record in orange in the Super Bowl is 0-4. In all 4 losses, the Broncos have been cumulatively outscored by a margin of 167-38 (that's a margin of negative-129 points, and no, I'm not making that up). Also, I would not support orange pants. IMO, the Broncos should go back to a navy blue on white look (blue jerseys, white pants).

So we now know that the final 4 teams in contention to play in Super Bowl LV are the following matchups: AFC Championship Game: Buffalo Bills vs. Kansas City Chiefs Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs. Green Bay Packers. Hey @pitt6pack, could you please update with possible team matchups? I'm meaning Chiefs vs. Packers, Chiefs vs. Buccaneers, Bills vs. Packers or Bills vs. Buccaneers. Also, I have to mention that if the Tampa Bay Buccaneers advance to Super Bowl LV as NFC champions, it would mark the first time in NFL history that a team played in the Super Bowl in its regular home stadium.