AstroCree

Daring today, aren't we?

I'm glad clubs have been bringing back long sleeves these past few years. It's a good kit but again, I wish they weren't so afraid of blue anymore. A lot of their kits could've really used that as a secondary color.

It was ruined the moment someone compared it to the sinking Titanic which, if there was ever a stronger metaphor for this club and their yearly title woes...

You can do a whole bunch of former Mets from that drop-shadow era. This is gonna be super controversial but the black uniforms originally lasted 15 years, plus a few more and counting with its recent comeback. Can an argument be make that, specifically the black home jersey is becoming more of a "right" Mets uniform? They've already lasted longer than the 80s racing stripes and those are super iconic for obvious reasons.

My high school colors were Green, Black and White. The baseball team had a recolored Pittsburgh Pirates hat but the logo was green instead of yellow.

I'm so glad we're moving past that "bland white kit" era. Anything is better than nothing.

The fake was better

This is the worst version of the "football in football" logo for being the most visually bland. They won't let it die since it's the logo that represents their greatest achievement. Not just their lone Super Bowl but their overall playoff accomplishments, as limited as they are. Whether they bring back the Namath or New York Sack Exchange era, I just need a change because last season was terrible. They wore green ONCE and it was mono on top of that. Even their endzones were black majority of the season. Green felt like an afterthought. That's a branding disaster to have your primary color seem less important. We went through all that trouble of fixing the damn color and they don't even wear it. BFBS needs to leave the Jets for good. It represents nothing but the lowest times of this already sorry franchise.

I thank god every day the Saints wore gold pants that night.

Why did the NFL become so allergic to conference logos? This shouldn't be so hard.

They should've used this. The Mets also screwed up. Instead of the obvious choice, being Mr. Met, they just went with their normal logo.

Between MLB and NHL, I don't know who's worse when it comes to marketing their own game.

What is this? Just what are they doing?

as if these clubs don't already make a ton of money.

am I going crazy or have the Knicks not worn their primary uniforms in such a long time. Every time I turn on the game it's always their black or navy jersey. Did they lose their blue and white uniforms? EDIT: I checked, they wore the white uniform last week. Sounding like a broken record but this uniform matchup between the Knicks and Lakers just sucks.

do the flags have to be that big?

IIRC they used to play the Xbox 360 startup every time the game started.

I hope NYCFC don't go for a mono look. They need to breakout the navy shorts again.

Why do the Saints have to make this so difficult?

This has never been a problem for their entire existence. Why would it suddenly be a problem now?

I'm 100% done with this whole aesthetic.

nothing about what the Eagles are doing looks good. Have we just gone crazy? What looks good about an all black uniform with little to no contrast? It's so BORING! All the character in the uniform is lost! I just don't get it.

I'm glad the Jets (Green) and the Jaguars (Teal) are out here with their always lively black and white uniforms.

Jets wear green but keep the black endzones. Baby steps.

Their best from that set were the blue alts.