PrimalCookie

A series like this is exactly what I've wanted to do for a long time, but never got around to it (I think did Timber Creek and Apopka, but nothing after), so needless to say I'm very interested! Boone looks great, I don't really have much to say about them. As for specific high school suggestions, I went to Timber Creek so I have some on them. In the past, we used to break out the black pants for big games like Clemson does with their orange pants. That tradition ended over the last few years, with all black becoming much more common, but I'd love if that was brought back because the blackout game (usually against either Winter Park or University) was always the best attended and most fun to be at. However, despite going on that whole tangent about the blackouts, might I suggest that the primary color be changed to purple? A bunch of other OCPS schools use black but IIRC no one else uses purple, and the branding of the school aside from the football team is always purple first. It'd give us a much more unique identity in football than right now.

I wouldn't go as far as "worst uniform in the league", and I'm mostly fine with it on the away (although I still prefer white pants for those), but I wholeheartedly agree that the yellow pants make the home significantly worse. There has never once been a good uniform where all 3 elements were different colors and the helmet was the lightest of them. Someone will probably quote this with pictures of teams that have done that and "looked good" before, but I don't care. Every single one is ugly and would be much improved if one of those 3 colors were either in a different order or one was taken away.

If this is it, looks like I'll be buying my first new jersey since 2017. Love that they're finally leaning back into gold.

Only thing that came to mind when I saw that logo:

YESSSSSSSSS

Thank you!

Florida's adding a black alternate. No idea when they'll be revealed, or what they'll look like (it could follow the same template as the rest of football, look more similar to the ones basketball wears, or be something new entirely) but Napier said it'll be worn in the game closest to Veterans Day. This year, that'd be @ LSU, but I'm guessing it'll actually be the week prior at home against Arkansas so they can show it off to the home fans.

I'm also bugged by the sleeve stripes being white-orange-white and the pants stripes being orange-white-orange. All white also has the same issue, with the pants not having the white in between the navy and orange. I'm usually not a "striping consistency above all else" type of guy, and it doesn't usually matter because they almost never go monochrome, but when they do it bothers me a good bit.

Hi @Silent Wind of Doom Could I please have - Orlando Magic 1994-95 and 2008-09 Eastern Conference champions - Orlando City 2011 and 2013 USL Pro champions + 2022 US Open Cup champions - Tampa Bay Buccaneers 2002 and 2020 Super Bowls - Tampa Bay Rays 2008 and 2020 AL pennants - Florida football 1996, 2006, and 2008 national champions + 1991, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 2000, 2006, and 2008 SEC champions - Florida basketball 2006 and 2007 national champions - Florida baseball 2017 national champions - Werder Bremen 1964-65, 1987-88, 1992-93, and 2003-04 Bundesliga champions - Greg Biffle 2000 NASCAR Truck Series and 2002 NASCAR Busch Series champion - Tyler Reddick 2018 and 2019 NASCAR Xfinity Series champion Thanks!

The numbers are a bit much, but this should become an all sports thing for ASU. Looks amazing

Is it just me or is that ad a decent bit larger than usual? I hope it's just me.

I was a pretty big fan of these ones: Plain, sure, but I really liked the turquoise details.

That, and their current collar (ish) design probably doesn't mesh well with the new template's front seam.

These statements contradict each other. How do regular season games matter if Utah, who lost 3 games (one of which to a 6-6 Florida who lost to *Vanderbilt*), makes it over TCU, who didn't lose at all in the regular season and then lost (in OT!) against a top 10 team they'd already beaten a few weeks earlier*? In your system, only one game matters, nothing else. *This is more of a problem with doing a round robin and then a redundant CCG after that, but it still applies as long as that's how we're determining the champion of 10 team conferences.

It'd work this year, sure, but I think 2019 was a perfect example of why the BCS was broken. We had 13-0 LSU, 13-0 Ohio State, and 13-0 Clemson. Who do you leave out? There's no good answer. That possibility alone makes the 4 team playoff better than the BCS.

Assuming Michigan and Clemson win, the bracket would probably look something like this: #12 Tulane @ #5 Ohio State - Winner plays #4 Utah* #11 Penn State @ #6 TCU - Winner plays #3 Clemson* #10 Kansas State @ #7 Alabama - Winner plays #2 Michigan #9 Tennessee @ #8 USC - Winner plays #1 Georgia *Byes can only go to conference champions, so Utah and Clemson jump up Sign me up!

If I was a betting man, I'd bet some serious money that the final rankings will be 1. Georgia 2. Michigan 3. TCU 4. Ohio State 2 losses has always been a dealbreaker to the committee, even for conference champions, so I'd be genuinely shocked if Alabama's in. They'll then swap TCU and Ohio State so we don't have a first round rematch between Michigan and OSU.

2019: #5 Utah makes the playoffs with a CCG win, loses 2021: #3 Oregon makes the playoffs if they win their last 3 games, loses to Utah twice 2022: #4 USC makes the playoffs with a CCG win, loses to Utah Are we sure they're not a double agent?

The Pac-12 went divisionless this season, and the ACC, American, and Mountain West will join them in that next year. I imagine the SEC and Big Ten will as well once Texas/Oklahoma and USC/UCLA join. Soon enough, the only conferences that still have them will be G5 leagues like the Sun Belt trying to keep travel costs down. I'm not a huge fan of it, tbh. The Pac-12 showed us the flaws of a divisionless system this year by having a 3 way tie between Utah, Oregon, and Washington where Utah and Washington didn't play each other (which I have no idea how Utah was the winner considering they lost to Oregon and Washington beat them, but that's besides the point). If that's happening in a 12 team conference, it might get really bad in a 16 team one. I also don't like that both this year and last, without divisions Michigan and Ohio State would meet for a second straight week in the championship, basically rendering the first game pointless. It's like how Alabama beat Georgia to win the SEC championship last year, but no one cares because they lost the game that really mattered a month later. I don't want that to happen to big rivalries as well... aside from Florida-FSU in 1996, of course.

Look on the bright side, Mexico - you finally broke the round of 16 streak going back to 1994! As for the US, that means if we get past the Dutch we'll play the winner of Argentina-Australia.

1. Costa Rica #3 2. Morocco #2 3. Costa Rica #2 4. Germany #1

41% (11) of the non US players are Canadian, so 16 for everyone else. That's 8th, behind the Big 5 plus Belgium and Turkey, which isn't half bad.

1. Poland #1 2. Denmark #2 3. France #2 4. Argentina #2

Canada with white in game 1, black in game 2, red in game 3. Will that the first time a team's used 3 jerseys at the World Cup?