kimball

I ... I ... don't hate the idea? I just feels like someone took the original purple and decided to play with the shadow and saturation levels until they got to black.

Yeah, but after the 13th time in two days it gets a LITTTTTTTTLE annoying for the rest of us.

Is this a bad thing?!

It's just the NBA 75 "diamondization" of the logo.

They played on it against the Jazz a couple nights ago, I'm sure it will since the Mixtape jerseys lean heavy toward that design.

The last year that didn't have a new logo or significant change was the 1998-99 season ... aaaaaaand I refuse to acknowledge that was "FOREVER" ago.

I kind of feel like the AAC could easily die, especially if Memphis and either SMU, Tulane or Tulsa jump to the Big XII. I feel like that could cause a merger with Conference USA with the remaining schools or the AAC could kill Conference USA by raiding them for schools?

I think my favorite plan is the Mandalay Bay site, because of it's easy access from I-15 and 215. The Rio isn't bad. But, the Festival Grounds has potential, especially if A's ownership wants to develop the area. There's a lot of need near the Festival Grounds. I am excited. I hope the A's make the jump.

Heck, I'll pay 20% tithing for the next two years to help get BYU into the Big XII quicker.

Green very much matches Utah (resident here). But, honestly, I think Jazz fans are largely indifferent to the team’s identity crisis because the navy blue feels like a muted purple and the red rock jerseys represent the state where as the TEAM colors are more associated with NOLA still.

It sounds like that Suns Azteca jersey isn't set to be released anytime soon. They're doing market research I guess? https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/32090195/phoenix-suns-introduce-new-uniform-concept-based-aztec-symbolism-mixed-reaction

I feel like this needs to be added to the Vegas sportsbooks.

It 100% was. I am hoping the Raptors play in Husky throwbacks, but seeing that the NBA likes to screw things up it'll probably be their Team Mashup jersey.

we can hope … but … it won’t happen.

Doing a 30-second Google search, um ... I know nothing about that logo? They've had three logos since 1995 and nothing like that. I wonder if it's a fauxback logo just for the throwback? Which is half cool, half disappointing and all the way wrong.

I think the Jazz could pull something like that off with their basketball logo. Maybe even the Pacers? But, I agree with you ... I kinda like it.

This fugly thing.

So here are the tweets directly from the Knicks and Celtics announcing those jerseys. It looks like it's just the Celtics, Knicks and Warriors doing the "Classic" since they started in 1947.

Why do I like that Primary Court? I know I shouldn't, especially when the only court the Pistons should have is this ...

I think what @jb1322is alluding to, is that Classic Edition was supposedly not happening in lieu of the City/Mashup(?) Edition because of the 75th anniversary. Who knows? Maybe it's just for the teams just celebrating their 75th anniversaries?

Exactly, they'll just have awkwardly dumb logo with a 6 looking like a 0.

I like the logo treatment. I am glad the jersey logo isn't the diamond logo.

Are Oklahoma State or Texas Tech really THAT attractive to the PAC-12? I just don't see that happening. Now on the other hand, I could totally see a new conference emerge, perhaps a revived SWAC with a mix of XII and AAC members.

Since the Nike switch I'm only counting 2 of 4 with Toronto and Milwaukee. I'd argue that Milwaukee's isn't a random alt, since they've had a similar black alt since 2015. That said ... the only jerseys teams should wear in the playoffs (and especially The Finals) are the Association, Icon and Statement.