Jump to content

RamosLynn

Members
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RamosLynn

  1. Also... Another 49ers-Chiefs Super Bowl, another Super Bowl where all TDs were scored on the 49ers endzone.
  2. It is awful no matter how you slice it. Far and away the worst logo of the new design (LVI-Present) and up there for worst ever, i wish it was hyperbole.
  3. Here is a decent shot of the Chiefs endzone
  4. I don't necessarily hate the 49ers wordmark being red but gold would've been better. The spacing is pretty decent but with a shorter wordmark it does look off-kilter. The positive i find in this, is that it does set it apart from SB LIV. Super Bowl logos look great and overall I think this is a solid looking field.
  5. Fair enough mate! Saloon font is not the problem to me, it is the fact that it is red. Gold saloon font would've been better imo OR, gold endzone to also contrast with the red of the logo.
  6. I... don't hate it honestly. I think the red 49ers saloon wordmark is a bigger travesty, if anything.
  7. Hold on wait a second, don't tell me this is a Blank Space Taylor Swift reference, i will lose it. Lol.
  8. Blank borders? Can't remember if that is how they usually do it, but if it's not and this is how it will be, i honestly don't hate it.
  9. Same format confirmed, 49ers back to only logo in the endzone, unlike the helmet of SB LIV
  10. It's that time of the year again! The previous endzone design lasted 8 super bowls (XLII-XLIX), so we are due for a new one as this has lasted eight already (50-LVII).
  11. It's a cool logo, purple will look great on the field and i like the 'round' approach to vary from flat ones.
  12. https://imgur.com/a/0zsQ0i7 On my tablet, so I can't post a link but a better look at the field
  13. Thanks for the correction. It does not,but that is what I'm saying, I don't see a black outline in the Eagles wordmark either, and it should not, would look kind of cool though.
  14. The Cheifs wordmark does not have a Black outline never
  15. Am I crazy or that just looks like blank space of grass?
  16. Here is a decent look at the field. Worth noting, no outline on Eagles wordmark, at least not just yet
  17. Boy the super bowl logos look massive, but they look good since they need it for all the detailing. All in all, a good looking field. This execution of the Eagles EZ is a million times better than the one in SB LII
  18. I liked that, actually. Because it was the 100th NFL season. The problem was the Chiefs not doing the same. The Rams one in LIII was far worse.
  19. I actually quite dig this! Looks pretty nice. Far better than the absolute mess that was the SB LII design. I don't hate the endzones not having the conference logo as long as the team logo + wordmark cover the endzone and have even spacing. It looked good on the Broncos in SB 50 and the Patriots in Super Bowls LI and LII. Looked horrible on the Eagles for SB LII and Rams in LIII.
  20. Here is the wordmark with no paint. Is it me or the "S" looks small and kind of squeezed in? May be the angle of the picture.
  21. Which I really like, it's going to look great just like how LVI was great
  22. NFL+Super Bowl logos painted. They look real nice.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.