Jump to content

RamosLynn

Members
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RamosLynn

  1. Image

     

    I don't necessarily hate the 49ers wordmark being red but gold would've been better. The spacing is pretty decent but with a shorter wordmark it does look off-kilter. The positive i find in this, is that it does set it apart from SB LIV.

     

    Super Bowl logos look great and overall I think this is a solid looking field.

    • Like 2
  2. 2 minutes ago, ruttep said:

     

    Let's just say we could not be further from agreement. I love the saloon wordmark and the 49ers should never have retired it in the 00s.

    Fair enough mate! Saloon font is not the problem to me, it is the fact that it is red. Gold saloon font would've been better imo OR, gold endzone to also contrast with the red of the logo.

    • Like 2
  3. 18 minutes ago, RamosLynn said:

    Blank borders? Can't remember if that is how they usually do it, but if it's not and this is how it will be, i honestly don't hate it.

     

     

    Image

     

    Hold on wait a second, don't tell me this is a Blank Space Taylor Swift reference, i will lose it. Lol.

    • LOL 1
    • Eyeroll 1
  4. 11 hours ago, cindyva said:

    Found this (and other) images from a cnet article. Looks like a black outline on the Eagles word mark, and alternating “dark/light” grass cut on the field.  

     

     

    Link to source article https://www.cnet.com/pictures/explore-the-cameras-trucks-and-retractable-field-at-super-bowl-lvii/10/

     

     

    Another step in the right direction for SB fields. I really dig this field

     

     

     

     

     

     

  5. 2 minutes ago, Cujo said:

     

    The 49ers forcing a throwback helmet in place of their logo in Super Bowl 54. That was almost as bad as the Patriots' SB49 endzone.

    I liked that, actually. Because it was the 100th NFL season. The problem was the Chiefs not doing the same.

     

    The Rams one in LIII was far worse.

  6. 1 hour ago, Cujo said:

    As we all assumed

     

    FoINNG8XoAQhkX3?format=jpg&name=large

    I actually quite dig this! Looks pretty nice. Far better than the absolute mess that was the SB LII design.

     

    I don't hate the endzones not having the conference logo as long as the team logo + wordmark cover the endzone and have even spacing. It looked good on the Broncos in SB 50 and the Patriots in Super Bowls LI and LII. Looked horrible on the Eagles for SB LII and Rams in LIII.

    • Like 1
  7. 2 minutes ago, pitt6pack said:

    Another pick of the field

    FnwewD-X0AI8KpD?format=jpg&name=large

     

    Looks like the Super Bowl logos will span a width of 16 yards this season, larger than the 14 yards from last season. The height however is what looks to remain the same as last season.
    So maybe a new standard height for the on field Super Bowl logo for at least the next few seasons.

     

    Which I really like, it's going to look great just like how LVI was great

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.