Jump to content

WBeltz

Members
  • Posts

    459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by WBeltz

  1. 30 minutes ago, Digby said:

    Yeah, DCU and Toronto beat them to the convention from the start, then, FC Dallas were the first 96 club to rebrand Euro-style. And Real Salt Lake and Chivas USA ushered in the particularly WTF takes on language to team names.

    I personally would like to see some names that would make for interesting use instead of FC/United all the time. Like Charlotte should be Charlotte Athletic, I would've loved to see Austin FC be Locomotive Austin. I get they want it to be "Euro Centric" but there's more than just United or FC in Europe. 

  2. It also sounds like the 96 is being added into the flag outline. Does that mean the new crest since it looks like the Ohio flag? Or a different logo with that shape?

  3. 56 minutes ago, _RH_ said:

    I mean if you want it to look like their flag and have a "C", why don't you rotate the flag?

    j69TMj4.png

    I actually hate this more than what they made. I dunno if if it’s just the shape of the new badge turned or what. But this ain’t for me lol

  4. 12 minutes ago, Dilbert said:

    Went ahead and did an unnecessary update to Haslams other club. After all dont mess with tradition right?

    E1DsHpAXEAAKQUU?format=jpg&name=small

    I mean the 2014 - 19 uniforms were enough for a walk back apparently 🤔

  5. 1 minute ago, 4_tattoos said:

    How many teams won't have the MLS logo on their sleeves this season?

    I think it was LAFC and DC United for sure. I don’t remember if Portland will or not.

  6. 11 hours ago, monkeypower said:

    Did the Ducks license the D-5 stuff from Disney? I know Lids/Jersey City (whoever that is in the States) had been selling movie jerseys, including the Mighty Ducks, last year (don't know if they still are) which I guess would also fall under a licensing thing.

    The Ducks were founded by the Disney Company in the early 90s. Disney sold them in 2005 to the current owners, and my guess is there is a deal in place for stuff like this.

  7. 1 hour ago, kerlonmoura said:

    That Sounders jersey is beautiful! Shame about the white sponsor and numbers though...

    I’m sure a lot of People share this thought, but the zuliliy sponsor is still the worst. I miss XBOX 

  8. 8 hours ago, Andy said:

     

    It's the "Tim Couch Number" to me. A harbinger of poor QB play to come.

    Well, at least the Colts could be looking at a Top 5 pick for a QB next year if this is a sign of things to come. 😬

  9. 56 minutes ago, _RH_ said:

    1. No black?  No tin foil?  That alone makes it a great start!

    2. I keep expecting them to go with the checkerboard one of these years:Rain didn't stop the Cauldron last Saturday!

    I would definitely like to see the checkerboard design. Not like how NYRB has, but more like Barca/Croatia with giant ones.

  10. 4 minutes ago, schlim said:

    If these are legit, it's absolutely hilarious there is a post with the Bengals announcing their uniforms won't be unveiled this month, then an hour later, the jerseys are leaked.

    Then watch them do an impromptu reveal later this week because they gotta do something now that the cat is out of the bag.

  11. 37 minutes ago, DG_ThenNowForever said:

     

     

     

    Random thought I had, I am astounded the Inter Miami doesn’t have a shirt advert yet. Wasn’t there rumors of Qatar Airlines or something or another becoming their front one? Did that not pan out or are they waiting?

  12. 7 hours ago, upperV03 said:

    I cannot outright confirm the authenticity of this, as I have not seen the real thing, but I do trust my source and the info that was provided to me. We’ll have to wait to see a leak of the real thing, but if this info is indeed legit then this kit will be wild and polarizing to say the least.

    Kinda bummed we’re not getting the navy and white kit we were rumored to be getting. It’s definitely interesting though.

  13. 11 minutes ago, KitLeakBoi said:

    image.jpg

     

    Chicago

     

    So the away kits are on a 3 year old jersey template, and the home removes the red pinstripe-like design. 
     

    It’s fine.

     

    EDIT: Ok the away isn’t a old template but quasi-custom design. It definitely looks nicer at least.

  14. 12 minutes ago, Digby said:

    spacer.png

     

    On top of everything else, BMO using the no-wordmark logo is somehow even more intrusive. Early leader in the Kit Wooden Spoon rankings.

    Pics also showed black shorts, and I’d assume black socks. Just 🚮. Hopefully the away is a bit of a better looker.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.