Jump to content

seasaltvanilla

Members
  • Posts

    610
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by seasaltvanilla

  1. Better than Mississippi's redesign I would say. Attractive flag.
  2. This would be my best case scenario, re: outlines and colors.
  3. How hard is it to use apostrophes correctly, especially in a professional capacity.
  4. Again going off the assumption that the pennants are indicative of the jerseys. Possible cream Twin Cities alt. Might also be the City Connect, but it doesn't seem as far out as the CC typically are. Edit: Also, at this point I would expect a greater change to the Minnesota logo than just updating the script. Guessing Minnie and Paul will be redrawn/simplified.
  5. I included front numbers, as it looks a bit empty without them, especially with a single color logo.
  6. Beaten to it. Here's the picture as above: @coco1997 your wish is granted! Updated concept assuming the T-shirt and pennant are showing jersey accurate colors Really like the script.
  7. I've come to quite like the stronger T with the simplified top bar. Reminds me of the Vikings update which just made me realize all the unnecessary details of the old logo. I think in five years it will seem strange to see the serifs on the old TC.
  8. Overall I agree, but every recent MLB rebrand has had a custom number font. The 1 looks very similar to their current 1, and the aforementioned matching serifs. What's interesting is that in some aspects it's similar to the Wild's Winter Classic font. Compare the L's and the E's. But the Wild kept the block aesthetic versus smoothing things out. I'm sure the justification will be the smooth curves "match" the script better.
  9. Assuming the font in the announcement video is what they go with (which seems reasonable: compare the T's to the logo T, and the serifs on the C and 3 match the serifs on the 2009 Twins wordmark) and that Buxton isn't wearing a blank jersey and the neck is bare: Or some permutation of red/blue numbers/script, +/- the front number. Some version of the Minnesota logo on the sleeve.
  10. From the fabric texture and stitching I think this is the left corner of the C on the cap; TC stays and no mustard. Possibly the corner of a name? Doubt they would go solid navy logo or numbers. Pinstripe-less white jersey. White jersey sleeve piping. Initially thought this was a navy script with red outlines, but the texture makes me think it's a navy alternate (also matches what Buxton is wearing in the video). Still a question of what scripts they use and in which colors, ditto with the numbers.
  11. (Edited to have a more apples to apples comparison) Looks like the T has been thickened and the C definitely is squashed. I rather like the more solid T, and how the crossbar follows the curve of the C. I think this will help with the legibility issues some people have brought up before from long range. Cautiously optimistic for the rest of the set.
  12. The Twins use a different combination of Pantone colors than every other team in the league, therefore they have a unique color scheme. Honestly dude if you cant see the difference than I really can’t help you. This is a sports logos forum. Are you new here? Edit: Actually, this is in a strict sense wrong, the Braves and Cardinals also use officially use Pantone 200 and 289, but they're shaded differently in other applications. So it depends.
  13. The Twins have been wearing RWB since 1901 and three World Series. Go pick on the Rangers (1961, 0 WS) or the Nationals (1969, 1 WS) or the Angels (1961, 1 WS) to change their colors.
  14. It would be incredibly like the tone-deaf Twins to retain the worst part of their current identity. Worried we will get a Timberwolves style rebrand that will inevitably be walked back in seven years.
  15. I can't believe the Wild logo has been crooked on the mothership for years, to the point where it regularly shows up wrong in other places, and it hasn't been fixed. I'm half convinced it's a troll job at this point. What is going on with the Habs' numbers? Colorado and New Jersey both going with Rockies colors is strange. That Tampa jersey should have been left 1994 Microsoft Word where it belongs
  16. Ditch the mustard. Ditch the mustard. Ditch the mustard. Don't touch the TC. It's the one uniform element that has been unchanged since 1961.
  17. Incidentally this is by far my favorite look for the Gophers.
  18. At least they've been in the right ballpark with the colors. Still have PTSD from these:
  19. Whoa, whoa, slow down there maestro, there's a new Mexico?
  20. A solid concept for Minnesota. What about using the north star in the middle instead of the state as the separator between numbers and letters?
  21. Completely agree, that "federal" slate and bronze is a great, unique color scheme. Bring that back, leave the logo in the past. And in fact, if you simply flip the landmark imagery on the Weagle that removes a fair bit of the negative space that annoys Ridley. Eagle, Capitol, W covered on the chest. Maybe a DC flag with hockey sticks for stripes on the shoulders and the Caps' imagery from all eras is covered, minus cheesy text.
  22. I don't understand the appeal of the Screagle at all. It's horribly lopisided to the bottom left. I can't tell if the eagle has one or two wings, not in an interestingly abstract or intentional way, but because they just merge into an uninteresting blob in the upper right. The head and talon are rendered to imply three dimensionality, but the wing/body blob is flat. I want to say the perspective of the stars is wrong, but I can't because I'm not sure what the perspective of the eagle is supposed to be. There doesn't seem to be any significance or thought put into the overall silhouette of the logo, it's just what was left over when they put all the parts together. It feels like a napkin draft of a logo.
  23. Aurora FC kit reveal today: Detailed views on their Instagram.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.