Jump to content

Gothamite

Members
  • Posts

    36,227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    277

Everything posted by Gothamite

  1. You are absolutely correct. when the Sounders came into the league, they shared ownership with the Seahawks.
  2. The difference is that MLS was so desperate for a New York team that they were willing to put the club in a stadium situation nobody liked. And also, don’t forget that MLS had previously spent several years trying to build a NYC stadium on their own. They knew how hard it was, they knew what they were getting into, and the upside was still important enough to them that they went right ahead with it.
  3. MLS does not have a SSS requirement. It has a “control your stadium” requirement, to ensure that its teams aren’t tenants in somebody else’s park, without access to the revenue streams that a primary tenant controls even when someone else is using the stadium. So when MLS teams share ownership with the primary tenant of a stadium (like in Seattle or New York City), MLS can write the contract guaranteeing the soccer club a measure of most-favored status in the stadium, they’re plenty happy to put its club in a non-SSS.
  4. I’m guessing that they thought a full-on version would be too derivative.
  5. That doesn't surprise me in the least. Football teams are just about the worst caretakers of their own history. I've lost count of the times the Packers have goofed up their own historical uniforms.
  6. Yes, the design is great. If only it was half as accurate. Where did it come from?
  7. Not very. Some good, some wrong. Some missing.
  8. Last time, the Packers unveiled their throwback alternates in August.
  9. Not until they get rid of the white jersey elements designed to go with that uniform.
  10. That Championship font is indeed terrible. Especially since it ruins a pretty good run of fonts. They had two good ones in a row:
  11. I’m with you on the constant changes to the non-league numbers, but I love a league-wide numbers font. In a world where teams move between leagues, being able to use the Premier League font becomes itself a badge of honor. I love it... so long as we’re talking about a good font like the current one and not something like the cartoony early 2000s.
  12. This should absolutely be their helmet logo.
  13. No. That was never going to happen. The Giants tried to downplay New York by taking "NY" off their helmets (as the Cosmos did to their badge when they also moved to the Meadowlands), but neither of those teams was ever going to actually cut ties. That would have been suicidal.
  14. We’re talking about one of the best teams in baseball, though. First place from Opening Day to the very day they clinched a pennant. And still, could only draw flies.
  15. And I don’t understand the insistence on pretending that’s the only possible factor. Ah, well. To each their own.
  16. Before 2008 and 2009, I would absolutely have agreed with you.
  17. The Expansion Committee should never have let MLB be bullied into placing a team in Tampa Bay.
  18. The very large, very valid reason is that the Rays are the third most popular MLB team in their own market. Even when they're winning. That's not the stadium's fault. It's the expansion committee's.
  19. I don’t think we’ll ever get a television breakdown by opponent. But that would be interesting. I was going off the polls from a couple years back that put the Rays as the third favorite team. Among baseball fans. In their own market. Which would explain the discrepancy between their decent television ratings and their pathetic attendance, which not even winning has been able to improve. “Stadium location” is often cited by the team’s apologists, but I’m offering an alternate explanation that would fit the facts.
  20. The television ratings are helped by a disproportionate number of games against the Yankees and the Red Sox, the Tampa Bay area's two favorite teams.
  21. Spurs’ new shirt is out: I like it. Yes, it’s simple. But in person there’s plenty of texture and paneling to make it not look like a T-shirt, and from distance it’s a bold, clean blast of their colors. The only downside is that the lack of panels, piping, and trim means that the sponsor logo stands out more. Really wonder why they let the sponsor go outside the team palette. Shame that Kane is modeling the best Spurs shirt he’ll never wear.
  22. Given that football players barely wear sleeves anyway, most sleeve treatments are moot. Contrasting sleeves are one of the few things that can actually work.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.