Jump to content

MilSox

Members
  • Posts

    2,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by MilSox

  1. I like NFL skill position players in single digits and in the 10s. I feel like those numbers look best on guys who are fast and lean. That said, since few non-TE's are wearing numbers in the 80s anymore, I'd like them to be available to d-linesmen and linebackers. It was pretty common until the 1980s and big round numbers look better on those guys.
  2. That's the lighting. You can zoom in and see it's two greens.
  3. Perhaps, but I don't remember any version of the Bucks double greens being widely available before. Last time was in 2003 when there was a gray Irish Rainbow fauxback made by Nike. Before then M&N had the christmas version of the Rainbows for Sid Moncrief.
  4. That's probably bad lighting. But it's definitely two greens according to a friend who went to the open scrimmage where this image came from. Fanatics has also been pushing replicas of the double green Irish Rainbows lately.
  5. Maybe not in general, but how much talent do you think there to go around in a mid sized state like Michigan which already has 5 D1 programs, and sits on top of Ohio, which has even more? The room for North Dakota State to make such a jump was there because even though it's in a small state, there are no power conference programs from Western Minnesota on through Eastern Washington/Oregon, and you still have to go to Montana to find a program capable of competing on NDSU's level. That doesn't exist in Grand Valley's case. Trading being the Clemson/Alabama of Division 2 for being just another FCS program doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
  6. Grand Valley even in FCS would be a mistake IMO. Competing with Wayne State or Michigan Tech and the like for recruits is one thing. But to continue that same level of success in FCS means digging from the same talent pool as Michigan, Michigan State, and the MAC schools. North Dakota State got away with it because they're the top program in a fairly large swatch of the country. Grand Valley wouldn't have such a luxury.
  7. Vegas is one of my favorite cities, but I don't think it'll be the slam dunk that MLB thinks it is. The Knights work because they were the first major franchise in Vegas. They also play on an ice plant which I would imagine the locals find to be a nice change of pace from what they normally deal with. Last time I was in Vegas (a few months before COVID), I was honestly taken aback by how much Knights paraphernalia I saw around town. They've really embraced that team. The Raiders work because of all NFL teams, they probably have they fanbase that's the least affected by geography. They also play their games on the weekend in a tourist destination, so even when they have lean years, they can rely on the other team's fans to fill the seats. The only way I see Las Vegas working for MLB is if they somehow manage to build a ballpark on the strip and make it an absolute uniquely Vegas novelty/monstrosity that has to be experienced. I don't see too many locals wanting to spend a summer evening in Vegas baking in the desert sun. The only thing I can think to compare them to is the Diamondbacks, who may not even break a million fans for the entire season.
  8. Until the Bucks social media started posting pics of rookie Giannis after the finals, I'd completely forgotten that he ever wore this uniform.
  9. I feel like Engelmann Stadium at UWM in Milwaukee might be more on line with what you're going for. For context (and because I somehow still remember this information from a project I did when I was still a student there) the Eastside of Milwaukee is the most densely populated area in America that isn't on a coast or in Chicago. The main campus serves nearly 30,000 students yet contains only 4 city blocks. But somehow, they managed to wedge a soccer facility between two buildings that can accomodate over 3,000 spectators. Something that isn't appreciated enough by the general public who aren't stadium/urban planning dorks.
  10. After seeing the surprisingly (to me) overwhelmingly positive response to these from casual fans... or at least fans who aren't obsessive uni nerds... I may have to soften my stance on these. They aren't offensive to the eye (as much as some of us distaste monochrome) and are on brand for the Packers. So maybe I shouldn't be so critical. But damn... has the bar really been set this low? Part of me feels like the biggest reason these have been so well received is because we've been subjected to so many side panels and weird striping over the years that simply being inoffensive and looking like a football uniform is considered a home run.
  11. Dammit... I'm gonna have to be an Elks fan.
  12. The 1936 unis were so much more interesting and they represented a championship season. Why scrap that direction to call attention to an era when the team nearly went bankrupt? And not even the best unis from that era, at that? Especially if they're taking liberties and calling it "throwback inspired." At least the unis they wore with the northwestern stripes would register as Packers unis to most people. Then again, the rasslin fan in me loves that these are technically a tribute to Dick the Bruiser. I may have to get a #72 throwback.
  13. I'm down if you want my help. Inbox me.
  14. Absolutely. Hopefully you'll bring back those "Movin' Mavs" jerseys from the 80s back for Arlington.
  15. Get wilder with some other schools. But I feel like traditional looks are perfect for Vermont and other schools that had a long time varsity program. Speaking of which. I hope my alma mater (UWM) is included.
  16. Man, both throwbacks are a beaut! It actually does anger me that they Packers have botched the navy look everytime they tried it. They look so much better in your concept.
  17. Not feeling the red pins, otherwise this is a pretty solid look. Only I'm not sure I'd consider it an upgrade from the actual set if only because the White Sox hit a grand slam with theirs.
  18. I think Wyoming-WMU has a bit of the Texas-Tennessee think going on where one school is more associated with their mascot based logo that the similar monograms aren't a problem. Granted, it doesn't help that both mascot logos feature horses on top of the similar colors. I think I'd have preferred to see a WMU rather than just a W. But that would make Western the only D1 Michigan school not branding itself around a single block letter.
  19. Not bad. But keep in mind that the Packers used several fonts in the 60s as that sort of thing wasn't nearly as regulated in those days. I've seen team photos of Henry Jordan (74) and Forrest Gregg (75) wearing completely different 7s. Also, I would prefer the pants matched the jersey on the throwback, as was the case in 1944... the last time they won a championship in the "classic Lambeau" look.
  20. I remember Wisconsin using them the year they had Russell Wilson.
  21. Oh, I've definitely heard it... just not sure how accurate it is anymore. Besides, the 1980s UW-Mad phrase I've always liked was ESFU.
  22. In fairness, I'm not sure I'd call what surrounds Madison (or most of Wisconsin) "reality" in good conscience.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.