Jump to content

rmc523

Members
  • Posts

    144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Favorite Teams
    Miami Marlins

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

rmc523's Achievements

225

Reputation

  1. I agree that these could've been used more in the identity. Yeah, I don't like the G flying logo. I agree with this mostly. --- I liked the idea of Spiders, but understand why they went this way - and also they could always do Spiders as their city connect or something. I don't hate them but also don't love them. The winged G thing is the worst part of it. Even though they're not similar, it reminds me of a 90s gatorade logo for some reason.
  2. Florida's capital is similar - Tallahassee (more famous because of FSU, though).....it's the capital because it was equidistant between Pensacola and St Augustine back in the early 1800s when there wasn't much of anything further south.
  3. This echoes my thoughts exactly. The G and the bridge on the hat are the worst elements of it all.
  4. It won't be seen after being tucked in, but there's literally a fog cloud down on the GIANTS script on the bottom. The colors aren't the problem. The "G" is. I think it's a no brainer to tie into the Golden Gate and fog - as you point out, that's what everyone knows about it. I just hate the "G" - I guess I get it.......Giants.....Golden Gate....but why not an SF or even "Frisco" - aren't these supposed to be city connect? Not bridge connect lol.
  5. Sounds about right - Manfred continues to slowly erode/destroy MLB. Yeah, Colorado got pushed in front of a bus with this ASG as far as design goes. 1% chance of it changing - Manfred has continually shown he doesn't really care what fans think and will do it anyway.
  6. Those jerseys are terrible regardless of whether they were meant for Atlanta or Colorado.
  7. Agreed on your points - most specifically about that neat triangle snake logo could've been the hat logo - the Marlins did a unique logo for their hat, so it's not like it hasn't been done. When I was out in SF years ago, I was in a gift shop type store, and they had this (with matching shorts) and I had to get it. I'm on board with something like that.
  8. Yeah, I realize that. But it looks odd regardless. They should just start over lol.
  9. I overall like what I see with the Kraken name/branding. It's a weird name, but Seattle seems like a weird place, so it fits. No matter what name they chose, people will complain if they lose, and love it if they win. My only complaint about the S logo is that I can't help but see a seahorse rather than thinking of Kraken despite the subtle tentacle:
  10. I really like how they incorporated the space needle into it. Boring and generic aside, it drives me nuts how the T lines up with the crest on the left, but the R sticks out past it on the right. Why would you not have it end on the same line? What else would they call the Heat, though? Manatees? Alligators? Retirees? lol
  11. I don't like it. The S doesn't fit with the other characters. Or the C - one of the two needs to change. I also feel it went too simple with the background shapes. They could've removed the yellow background and done yellow outlines of the shapes behind the SONIC text.
  12. Rumors are potentially next month. They are? I've liked what I've seen.
  13. It certainly looks like pink shorts. These may not look too bad after all. I still think the shade of pink is a tad too light, but the contrasting shorts will definitely help.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.