Sec19Row53

Well, he is a highly successful NFL head coach - just ask him https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/packers-mike-mccarthy-calls-himself-a-highly-successful-nfl-coach-at-4-5/

If I recall correctly, there were even statements about insufficient rebar/support within the pillars. It's not just needing to fix cracks and patch items, as mentioned upthread, it appears to have been shoddily built, and thus "fixing" it contributes to that exorbitant repair price.

Yes to the Jets being good - their lines were great yesterday. If I say the Packers had a crappy game, that takes away from the fact that the Jets owned us in the second half. Rodgers has lost downfield accuracy this year. His receiving corps isn't anything to write home about. Both LaFleur and Rodgers fall in love with passing the ball and fail to use their two best offensive players (not named Rodgers) in Jones and Dillon.

The world mourns for you. [/sarcasm]

Apparently in this case, "Maize out" means they're out of maize.

No, thank goodness Patriots

Sigh. It wasn't caveman. It wasn't Greek. It was stereotypical of the style that was indicated by the former team nickname.

I'm glad. I'd have lost all respect for you otherwise

Did you look at the tweet?

The ball was the home team

Silver - 2 years Red - 26 years White - 32 years

Many people here feel those colors are overused. Many people are likely right. But why should any one team that has used those colors for-freaking-ever feel inclined to change them just because other teams are also using them? That makes no sense to me from the perspective of the team.

Consider that part of the pre-game festivities includes pounding on the big drum in the stands, it isn't organically drummed up [pun intended] by the fans.

I'm sorry I've missed this. Nice job.

Or was it Ken O'Brien with the Jets? The Jets went green when the other 4 teams still wore white shells.

I totally understand your take on this. Thanks. You're also right that neither of us will change the other's mind My aesthetic preference is from a time when most teams had a single pair of pants. It's why mono-white doesn't bother me, because it was the frequent default for football teams. I've had my say and should let this drop, but I know myself better than that lol

I understand. My hill to die on is that your best look is your best look, regardless of situation.

And I thought good form would be to acknowledge such a post so as to not look like you're borrowing the idea. If you were emphasizing it, maybe you should quote it?

Lifelong Packer fan. Hate the Bears. LOVE their uniforms. Never will I agree that the top picture is a better look for the Bears.

Do you read this thread?

FTFY

Thanks. I can't get past that I expect the Lions to be Honolulu blue and silver, but other than that I really can't argue with you. I'm less sure of the Royals' look, but that's about it.

Should they have stayed at 12? It will be 18 within 5 years. Give me more NFL - any night of the week. Yeah, I said it. I'll watch as many games in the regular season as I can.

Nor is it necessary. In the case of your great suit, that suit isn't your brand (you are). If you change your clothes, you aren't affecting your brand. The same isn't true of a sports team (or other franchise). Clearly, it's about the ability to make more money. If it weren't, you'd see McDonald's outfit their employees in throwback uniforms. I don't have to like it, because my preference for sports teams is to always look your best. I won't convince people that I'm right (because who know if I am), but it's what we do here

Just curious - why do you think they look cool? I assume it is because the colors seem to work well together (and in how they are presented), but I don't want to put words in our mouth.