Jump to content

College Football Uniforms - 2015 Season


buckeye

Recommended Posts

Potential new ASU helmet for 2015...I've seen it in person, but didn't have my phone on me. Here's a pic that started circulating.

CBe4OMSU8AEM3ej.jpg

(MLF) Chicago Cannons,  (IHA) Phoenix Firebirds - 2021 Xtreme Cup Champions

(WAFL) Phoenix Federals - WAFL World Bowl XII Champions (Defunct)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Desert Fuel is a top 5 Nike pro combat Alt. If I were in charge id Wear that for one game a year and Maroon and Yellow with Sparky helmet for the rest. Hope Adidas can realize this too.

they won't lolz

JaiBirdDesignSig.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desert Fuel is a top 5 Nike pro combat Alt. If I were in charge id Wear that for one game a year and Maroon and Yellow with Sparky helmet for the rest. Hope Adidas can realize this too.

I'm pretty sure asu concocted the whole uniform and nike had nothing to do with it. It was just a recolor that was likely ordered by asu staff. To me it just does not stand out as a design that nike would promote as a one off but I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ASU's Desert Fuel uniforms are one of my favorite sets ever. It should only be used once a season for their biggest game of the year, though.

I'm scared of what Adidas might do, but I'm also really intreagued that they seem willing to keep the desert fuel set in some capacity.

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'm the only one that thinks copper/gray/white is inferior to maroon/yellow.

Maroon and yellow is superior, but Arizona State has muddled up their look since the rebrand. If they ditched the black and bowling ball helmets they'd improve tremendously.

km3S7lo.jpg

 

Zqy6osx.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ASU's Desert Fuel uniforms are one of my favorite sets ever. It should only be used once a season for their biggest game of the year, though.

I'm scared of what Adidas might do, but I'm also really intreagued that they seem willing to keep the desert fuel set in some capacity.

Why would you abandon your school colors for the biggest game of the year on an annual basis?

Since there's nothing proprietary regarding the desert fuel uniform (it's a color scheme), if the school wants to keep it they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michigan debating leaving Adidas for Nike or Under Armor: http://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/wolverines/2015/04/02/michigan-jim-hackett/70814464/

I don't think this is April Fool's Day... it was posted technically on April 2.

I really hope they return to Nike but going to UA would still be 5 notches above Adidas.

I was decently supportive of adidas since they tend to do well with "traditional" looks like Nebraska or Michigan. Our normal uniforms are near perfect with maybe a small gripe for the way the TechFit template stretches some players' sleeve stripes. But that's relatively minor and you'll have those little inconveniences with any supplier.

That being said, however, adidas' track record of horrific alternate uniform design is really pushing me to prefer Nike or UA. Most of what they churn out looks like a kid who downloaded a Fraser Davidson concept and hacked it up in Paint. There are like 2 bad ass elements in each adidas concept, but they never overcome the 17 other things that are blatantly stupid about the design.

So, since my school rocks a traditional design I see nothing that motivates me to stick with adidas. Nike or UA (heck, Russell!) could just as easily design the classic stripe look and they'd certainly offer more compelling alternates. adidas' alternates have such a flamboyant, metrosexual douchbaggery about them. It's almost like they got their start designing soccer uniforms or something.

UyDgMWP.jpg

5th in NAT. TITLES  |  2nd in CONF. TITLES  |  5th in HEISMAN |  7th in DRAFTS |  8th in ALL-AMER  |  7th in WINS  |  4th in BOWLS |  1st in SELLOUTS  |  1st GAMEDAY SIGN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Potential new ASU helmet for 2015...I've seen it in person, but didn't have my phone on me. Here's a pic that started circulating.

CBe4OMSU8AEM3ej.jpg

It looks awesome, but where are the school colors? So many college teams are just throwing them away to look cool.

Black and copper look great but...

6438c1f4ede023d2b54ddf001fb449e1.jpg

5175aea1ca6c4.preview-620.png

87Redskins.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michigan debating leaving Adidas for Nike or Under Armor: http://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/wolverines/2015/04/02/michigan-jim-hackett/70814464/

I don't think this is April Fool's Day... it was posted technically on April 2.

I really hope they return to Nike but going to UA would still be 5 notches above Adidas.

I was decently supportive of adidas since they tend to do well with "traditional" looks like Nebraska or Michigan. Our normal uniforms are near perfect with maybe a small gripe for the way the TechFit template stretches some players' sleeve stripes. But that's relatively minor and you'll have those little inconveniences with any supplier.

That being said, however, adidas' track record of horrific alternate uniform design is really pushing me to prefer Nike or UA. Most of what they churn out looks like a kid who downloaded a Fraser Davidson concept and hacked it up in Paint. There are like 2 bad ass elements in each adidas concept, but they never overcome the 17 other things that are blatantly stupid about the design.

So, since my school rocks a traditional design I see nothing that motivates me to stick with adidas. Nike or UA (heck, Russell!) could just as easily design the classic stripe look and they'd certainly offer more compelling alternates. adidas' alternates have such a flamboyant, metrosexual douchbaggery about them. It's almost like they got their start designing soccer uniforms or something.

There is typically only one thing that motivates athletic departments and that is $$$. Those who make the decisions really couldn't care less about uniform design. As long as the most $$$ possible is coming in then they are happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michigan debating leaving Adidas for Nike or Under Armor: http://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/wolverines/2015/04/02/michigan-jim-hackett/70814464/

I don't think this is April Fool's Day... it was posted technically on April 2.

I really hope they return to Nike but going to UA would still be 5 notches above Adidas.

I was decently supportive of adidas since they tend to do well with "traditional" looks like Nebraska or Michigan. Our normal uniforms are near perfect with maybe a small gripe for the way the TechFit template stretches some players' sleeve stripes. But that's relatively minor and you'll have those little inconveniences with any supplier.

That being said, however, adidas' track record of horrific alternate uniform design is really pushing me to prefer Nike or UA. Most of what they churn out looks like a kid who downloaded a Fraser Davidson concept and hacked it up in Paint. There are like 2 bad ass elements in each adidas concept, but they never overcome the 17 other things that are blatantly stupid about the design.

So, since my school rocks a traditional design I see nothing that motivates me to stick with adidas. Nike or UA (heck, Russell!) could just as easily design the classic stripe look and they'd certainly offer more compelling alternates. adidas' alternates have such a flamboyant, metrosexual douchbaggery about them. It's almost like they got their start designing soccer uniforms or something.

There is typically only one thing that motivates athletic departments and that is $$$. Those who make the decisions really couldn't care less about uniform design. As long as the most $$$ possible is coming in then they are happy.

Spot on. $$$ from the supplier is even more important as department budgets are hitting higher and higher levels. The revenue streams are more and more important, especially to cover the unplanned costs of coach buyouts, season ticket shortfalls etc. It's almost as if these athletic departments are being run like for profit business now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.