ARTnSocal Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 I agree with buckeye and OnWiz97, the Clippers' set is very solid indeed, and doesn't need changing.As far as the Clippers are concerned, I feel they are fine just the way they are, with one small exception, s**t-can the red away uniform and stick with the blue. That's a good looking set. Their logo could use a tweaking (only because it's too similar to the Lakers), but leave the uniforms alone, and toss away the red one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bosrs1 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Current clips home and away royal blue unis are great, don´t :censored:ing change, don´t like the light blue and red unis doeTheir light blue uniforms make zero sense.Have one of those beauties hanging in my closet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Current clips home and away royal blue unis are great, don´t :censored:ing change, don´t like the light blue and red unis doeTheir light blue uniforms make zero sense.Have one of those beauties hanging in my closet.Those are the best Clippers uniforms ever, the nautical flags on the side of the shorts actually spell out Clippers. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truepg Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 I don't like the powder blue - orange combination most people want them to go back to. It's an ugly color combination. Just because it's different doesn't mean it looks good. With that being said, the current uni set they have is better than good and they should stick with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoknight Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 I don't like the powder blue - orange combination most people want them to go back to. It's an ugly color combination. Just because it's different doesn't mean it looks good. With that being said, the current uni set they have is better than good and they should stick with it.Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne beg to differ. 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truepg Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 I don't like the powder blue - orange combination most people want them to go back to. It's an ugly color combination. Just because it's different doesn't mean it looks good. With that being said, the current uni set they have is better than good and they should stick with it.Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne beg to differ.Ugly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadojoker Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 I don't like the powder blue - orange combination most people want them to go back to. It's an ugly color combination. Just because it's different doesn't mean it looks good. With that being said, the current uni set they have is better than good and they should stick with it.You's sleepin on their best color combination set!! That powder blue and orange is unique and classic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjd77 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I don't like the powder blue - orange combination most people want them to go back to. It's an ugly color combination. Just because it's different doesn't mean it looks good. With that being said, the current uni set they have is better than good and they should stick with it.If done right there's no reason it can't look good. I'm sure I'm in a huge minority but I thought this late '90s Cavs set was pretty good using those colors. But I also know that in the NBA today most teams feel like it is a requirement to include either royal blue or navy in their identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonFromMiami Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 90s Cavs ? was that not royal blue and orange ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 The blue looks almost purple in those photos... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burmy Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I don't like the powder blue - orange combination most people want them to go back to. It's an ugly color combination. Just because it's different doesn't mean it looks good. With that being said, the current uni set they have is better than good and they should stick with it.If done right there's no reason it can't look good. I'm sure I'm in a huge minority but I thought this late '90s Cavs set was pretty good using those colors. But I also know that in the NBA today most teams feel like it is a requirement to include either royal blue or navy in their identity.The Cavs really like doing a throwback to almost every uniform/identity they've ever had...why not this one? (I still think that could be LeBron's best look) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 90s Cavs ? was that not royal blue and orange ?The Cavs' royal blue switched to light blue when the team changed logos and added black in the early 90s. The pictures show that the blue is a completely different shade than a royal blue.See our SME's site at www.colorwerx.net Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerslionspistonshabs Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 That Cavs set was nice...very clean, it just didn't mesh well with their identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafiaman Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 While I'm no proponent of returning to the John Stockton era of shorts in the NBA, I don't miss the days of size XXXXXXXL shorts that basically only show short players' ankles (player holding ball). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonFromMiami Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 90s Cavs ? was that not royal blue and orange ? The Cavs' royal blue switched to light blue when the team changed logos and added black in the early 90s. The pictures show that the blue is a completely different shade than a royal blue.See our SME's site at www.colorwerx.net got it, thanks..damn those fools have had alot of uniforms *facepalm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truepg Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I don't like the powder blue - orange combination most people want them to go back to. It's an ugly color combination. Just because it's different doesn't mean it looks good. With that being said, the current uni set they have is better than good and they should stick with it.If done right there's no reason it can't look good. I'm sure I'm in a huge minority but I thought this late '90s Cavs set was pretty good using those colors. But I also know that in the NBA today most teams feel like it is a requirement to include either royal blue or navy in their identity.The addition of black makes all the difference there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 The made a good choice moving away from those colours. As for the Clippers, they'd be right home in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 Do you think the designer realized that his/her idea for the red jersey goes right to hell if a player wears a single-digit number, or a two-digit number with a "1" in it?please explain?2nd that. .im lost too.I think he meant that since the logo will be printed on the stock jerseys, either the single-digit number must be set next to the logo or away from the logo. Actually, after a quick mock-up, the number spaced away from a logo doesn't look half bad, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 Do you think the designer realized that his/her idea for the red jersey goes right to hell if a player wears a single-digit number, or a two-digit number with a "1" in it?please explain?2nd that. .im lost too.I think he meant that since the logo will be printed on the stock jerseys, either the single-digit number must be set next to the logo or away from the logo. Actually, after a quick mock-up, the number spaced away from a logo doesn't look half bad, IMO.Such trash. I've been watching all of the Clips/Rockets series and they look so great with their current uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafiaman Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 Do you think the designer realized that his/her idea for the red jersey goes right to hell if a player wears a single-digit number, or a two-digit number with a "1" in it?please explain?2nd that. .im lost too.I think he meant that since the logo will be printed on the stock jerseys, either the single-digit number must be set next to the logo or away from the logo. Actually, after a quick mock-up, the number spaced away from a logo doesn't look half bad, IMO.The 2015-2016 Los Angeles Clippers: The NBA's answer to MLB's "Turn ahead the clock jersey" bomb. Especially the red ones. Yuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.