CubsFan4Life

New name for the Minnesota Wild?

Recommended Posts

The logo is the best in sports, the name is just fine and means something to us Minnesotans. Although the North Stars are still missed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1369677160288.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't there a lot of Native American tribes that have historically called Minnesota home?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The logo is the best in sports, the name is just fine and means something to us Minnesotans. Although the North Stars are still missed

Agreed. If only they'd use it, in its proper application, on all their uniforms. Grizzlies and Forester's I could get behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The logo is the best in sports, the name is just fine and means something to us Minnesotans. Although the North Stars are still missed

Agreed. If only they'd use it, in its proper application, on all their uniforms. Grizzlies and Forester's I could get behind.

Yes. Great logo but they keep marginalizing it.

As for the name, it's one of the worst names in big-time pro sports. Maybe the worst. Definitely the worst in the NHL. The logo (even used correctly) cannot make up for it. And even I don't think I want to change. They've had it for 15 years now and the idea of getting used to a new team name is strange. I guess the Washington NBA fans got used to it, as did the New Orleans fans. The Charlotte fans begged for it. So if it happened, then I'd get used to it. However, they did such a good job with the logo that it practically says "Wild." Foresters; why the bear head? Grizzlies; why he wilderness scene in a bear's head? So I'd argue a name change almost has to come with a logo change (i.e., identity overhaul).

The name is "Wild" and that's not going to change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The logo is the best in sports, the name is just fine and means something to us Minnesotans. Although the North Stars are still missed

I would hardly say the name is "fine", it's at best incredibly awkward. How the heck can someone be a "Wild" like how you call a player a "Canadien" or "Red Wing" etc. I'm aware the Avalanche and Lightning use non-plural names and those suck too, but Wild is especially bad because it's less of a thing then an avalanche or a bolt of lightning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Minnesota No Need To Change, Move Along, Discussed Too Many Times, Why? Hockey Club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Minnesota Thisthreadisgoingnowhere?

I don't see what's wrong with having a hypothetical discussion. I'm aware they won't bother changing now, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be. I don't care if they go on a Yankee-esque run and win 20-something Cups in the next 40 years, the name was atrocious when it was introduced and will remain so forever.

The funny thing is that I'd hardly care if it weren't for the fact that their logo might be my favorite in sports. I love it, yet I hate having to describe it as the "Minnesota Wild logo".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone thought of a name Minnesota can use while still keeping their genius logo?

Considering what forms the eye of their logo, how about the Minnesota North Stars?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's a lame singular name. Yes, I hate it. But it's been around for 15 years. A brand has been built. Just keep it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Minnesota Foresters

...sponsored by Subaru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.