Jump to content

2015 NFL Season-Now with Playoff Talk


buzzcut

Recommended Posts

Isn't the rule that you can't use the crown of your helmet to make a hit, especially helmet to helmet? I've seen that called a million times as a penalty. But it wasn't called there because the league just makes :censored: up as they go along.

At the time of the collision, Benard was a runner, thus not considered defenseless.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Love that the announcers repeatedly said that the hit on Bernard was good, but called the hit on Roethlisberger a "pile driver".

That's exactly what I mean. The different spin they put on the exact same thing is amazing. The league constantly pisses on your face and tries to tell you it's raining.

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't the rule that you can't use the crown of your helmet to make a hit, especially helmet to helmet? I've seen that called a million times as a penalty. But it wasn't called there because the league just makes :censored: up as they go along.

I believe that's limited to QB's, and only when the QB is still in the pocket or tackle box or within the numbers....something like that. (Or any player without the ball.)

If it's a QB on the run or a RB/WR/TE running with the ball....as long as they aren't in that defenseless position, I believe the "leading with the crown" distinction goes away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love that the announcers repeatedly said that the hit on Bernard was good, but called the hit on Roethlisberger a "pile driver".

That's exactly what I mean. The different spin they put on the exact same thing is amazing. The league constantly pisses on your face and tries to tell you it's raining.
He wasn't considered defenseless

http://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/2015-nfl-rulebook/#rule-12.-player-conduct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love that the announcers repeatedly said that the hit on Bernard was good, but called the hit on Roethlisberger a "pile driver".

That's exactly what I mean. The different spin they put on the exact same thing is amazing. The league constantly pisses on your face and tries to tell you it's raining.
He wasn't considered defenselesshttp://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/2015-nfl-rulebook/#rule-12.-player-conduct
I agree that he wasn't "defenseless", but it seems backwards to me that you can make such a dangerous play to legally cause a fumble and have the league/officials figuratively pat you on the back. But hey, maybe that's why their players' brains turn to jelly.

I'm rooting for the Bengals. I apologize for any maladies that are sure to follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't the rule that you can't use the crown of your helmet to make a hit, especially helmet to helmet? I've seen that called a million times as a penalty. But it wasn't called there because the league just makes :censored: up as they go along.

I believe that's limited to QB's, and only when the QB is still in the pocket or tackle box or within the numbers....something like that. (Or any player without the ball.)

If it's a QB on the run or a RB/WR/TE running with the ball....as long as they aren't in that defenseless position, I believe the "leading with the crown" distinction goes away.

Unless they took out the penalty known as spearing, I don't think you're allowed to put your head down. To me, it was penalty.

Cowboys - Lakers - LAFC - USMNT - LA Rams - LA Kings - NUFC 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like the ending of this game will echo bottlegate.

Quote
"You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke."

twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love that the announcers repeatedly said that the hit on Bernard was good, but called the hit on Roethlisberger a "pile driver".

That's exactly what I mean. The different spin they put on the exact same thing is amazing. The league constantly pisses on your face and tries to tell you it's raining.
He wasn't considered defenselesshttp://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/2015-nfl-rulebook/#rule-12.-player-conduct
I agree that he wasn't "defenseless", but it seems backwards to me that you can make such a dangerous play to legally cause a fumble and have the league/officials figuratively pat you on the back. But hey, maybe that's why their players' brains turn to jelly.

At some point, it has to be accepted that football is a physical game and you have to be able to give the defense a fighting chance to make tackles, make hits, be physical, and be able to make plays.

And, for what it's worth (since Bucfan won't mention it), the CBS announcers and former ref Mike Carey were all in agreement that the Burfict sack on Roethlisberger was legal and wasn't excessive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like the ending of this game will echo bottlegate.

So you think the officials are going to allow the Steelers to challenge a play after the Bengals have run another play after the play Pittsburgh challenged?

Damn, that's hard to describe. In any case, "bottlegate" is the only time in my life I've ever agreed with fans throwing stuff on the field. That was worst :censored:-ing of an NFL team I'd ever seen. I honestly can't blame Browns fans for their reaction to that one.

 

BB52Big.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.