Buster Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Can't wait to see what you do with the Hershey Bears.All of your logos are solid...I'd use that shatk over the B for Bridgeport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NY_CFL_fan Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Dark red, deep yellow and black, or....Fire, brimstone, and despair for colors. LOL, love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCRGraphix Posted September 2, 2015 Author Share Posted September 2, 2015 Up next are the Chicago Wolves. Their logo is dated and doesn't actually have any of their colors in it, so I designed a new one, and a whole identity around it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackerFan98 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Ooh, this is a big miss for me. As a Wolves fan I couldn't get behind this logo. I like your other teams though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 The wordmark is intriguing, with fine-tuning it could have a late-'70s feel to it that would suit the perpetually dated Rosemont/Des Plaines area well, but that primary is not working at all. The Wolves' logo is modern minor-league classic, if there can be said to be such a thing. All you have to do is isolate the wolf head to make it perfect. No, it doesn't have the team's colors in it. That's why it looks so good on the sweaters! It jumps right out! The argument over how to subdivide the name of the Bridgeport Sound Tigers reminds me of the one over the Nippon Ham Fighters (are they fighting against ham or on behalf of it?), confirming that it's one of the dumber AHL names and that you should just do the Isles' affiliate from scratch. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.