jp1409 1,986 Posted November 7, 2015 Larry, yes. The home uniform is not the current home just with yellow added. It very similar to other ones. Faux backs will have the same current font but in retro colors. Yellow 'D' on the home cap. Faux back will fit the color scheme of that look. Sodboy, I didn't want to compare the dbacks to the clippers, since the clippers are far worse, but these uniforms are unique. I'm not sure what they will look like in real life. The art I've seen is flat, it's either gonna translate very well, subtle yet modern or horrible mess.I don't like the subtle yet modern part nor the horrible mess one so I guess I'll hate these. The way you're saying it, it seems like there will be some weird texture/effect in there. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silver Shamrock 4 Posted November 7, 2015 Just wondering aloud...... is the Swinging Friar still monochromatic? Just blue on white?Or not to give too much away, will the Padres logos change at all? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FiddySicks 11,203 Posted November 7, 2015 Larry, yes. The home uniform is not the current home just with yellow added. It very similar to other ones.Faux backs will have the same current font but in retro colors.Yellow 'D' on the home cap. Faux back will fit the color scheme of that look.Sodboy, I didn't want to compare the dbacks to the clippers, since the clippers are far worse, but these uniforms are unique. I'm not sure what they will look like in real life. The art I've seen is flat, it's either gonna translate very well, subtle yet modern or horrible mess.I don't like the subtle yet modern part nor the horrible mess one so I guess I'll hate these. The way you're saying it, it seems like there will be some weird texture/effect in there.Sounds somewhat similar to the current TCU football uniforms, maybe? I hope not, because that absolutely sounds like a horrible mess. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ANGELCAT-IDA61 25 Posted November 7, 2015 I read it here on this thread a week or so ago. It could be just a rumor, but I read about the Twins adding a red alternate jersey, probably similar to their batting jersey. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Almighty 68 Posted November 7, 2015 Arizona getting rid or sedona red and sand is ridiculous, the colors represent zona perfectly, they should just put the A logo from the black jersey on the white jersey and on the red jersey, that would be 3 nice jerseys imo 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bmac 891 Posted November 7, 2015 Red jersey, TC logo on the chest. I would have preferred using "Twins" but we'll see how it looks in real life. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FiddySicks 11,203 Posted November 7, 2015 Arizona getting rid or sedona red and sand is ridiculous, the colors represent zona perfectly, they should just put the A logo from the black jersey on the white jersey and on the red jersey, that would be 3 nice jerseys imoThats the problem. There's enough :censored:ty drab depressing brick red, sand, and black hues around the Phoenix area as it is. I think we can let the baseball team have a little bit of vibrance. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrodsep 567 Posted November 7, 2015 @nordiques any new caps for teams other than D-Backs and Padres? New road, home and alternate caps for any other teams. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patsox 66 Posted November 7, 2015 It sounds to me like the Padres home uniforms will have the word "Padres" on the front in the font that the road uniforms currently use, in blue with a yellow outline. Sounds good to me, but I wish they would incorporate yellow on the road and alt uniforms. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bowld 2,146 Posted November 7, 2015 So now we will have the Padres and Twins both using a different color scheme at home vs away. Pretty lame if you ask me. Either included yellow on all of them or just forget it. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Packid 50 Posted November 7, 2015 If I follow everything correctly, this will be the Padres' new cap logo for next season. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IndyPadsfan83 0 Posted November 7, 2015 From what I'm hearing. Just for the home uni though. I believe he said the away and alt uni will still use the current cap without yellow. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
griffin128 17 Posted November 7, 2015 What stinks about that new Padre logo is that it eliminates the hidden "P" in the logo. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FiddySicks 11,203 Posted November 7, 2015 What stinks about that new Padre logo is that it eliminates the hidden "P" in the logo.It doesn't eliminate it, it just gets soaked up on the D and around the scripts. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quillz 1,356 Posted November 7, 2015 What stinks about that new Padre logo is that it eliminates the hidden "P" in the logo.Something new that I can never unsee. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gothamite 24,108 Posted November 7, 2015 What stinks about that new Padre logo is that it eliminates the hidden "P" in the logo.I think you're reading something into it that's not there. If they wanted to include a P they would have changed where the lines overlap.It's the difference between the arrow and spoon in the FedEx logo. One is a deliberate wink to the viewer, the other is inadvertent and not really there unless you squint and back up. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ferdinand Cesarano 4,563 Posted November 7, 2015 I like the TC cap for the Twins, and the DC cap for the Nats. The US capital hasn't legally been "Washington" since 1871. It's just "District of Columbia."But they aren't the "DC Nationals". So no "DC" cap logo is appropriate. As long as the locality name is "Washington", then the cap logo should be a W.Isn't this line of thinking rather facile? As erstwhile board superstar BallWonk was fond of pointing out, there is no legal incorporated City of Washington, just the District of Columbia which is informally called "Washington, D.C.," so there would be nothing wrong with the DC monogram.Again, the status of the name "Washington" is irrelevant; what matters is that it's in the team's name. That's the reason for a W hat.If the team were called the "D.C. Nationals", then the cap should have DC. If it were called the "Capital Nationals", then the cap should have a C. If it were called the "Arlington Nationals", then the cap should have an A. If it were called the "Northern Virginia Nationals", then the cap should have NV. And so forth.The team's cap should reflect the team's actual name. A straightforward concept. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Lankford 1,298 Posted November 7, 2015 The Twins, Angels, A's and Diamondbacks do not agree. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kixbinder5 13 Posted November 7, 2015 According to a website cited by Uni-watch, Diamondbacks are getting new uniforms next yearhttp://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/heat-index/2015/11/06/diamondbacks-set-unveil-new-uniforms-2016/75229662/ 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the admiral 28,765 Posted November 7, 2015 Again, the status of the name "Washington" is irrelevant; what matters is that it's in the team's name. That's the reason for a W hat. If the team were called the "D.C. Nationals", then the cap should have DC. If it were called the "Capital Nationals", then the cap should have a C. If it were called the "Arlington Nationals", then the cap should have an A. If it were called the "Northern Virginia Nationals", then the cap should have NV. And so forth. The team's cap should reflect the team's actual name. A straightforward concept. Nah, not really. DC would be fine. The team wouldn't have been called any of those things anyway. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
