MJWalker45 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 It's sarcasm. I don't think Puma or UA would throw out enough cash to make Chelsea jump like this. UA might if it were confirmed next year is the final with Spurs, Puma tends to be the lowest bidder after Umbro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berlin Wall Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Talking about Puma... I'm a simple person, I have a pixelated David Beckham as profile photo since 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayne Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Not their worst, but there's just always something so cheap and tacky about the way Puma put together their kits. I'm Danny fkn Heatley, I play for myself. That's what fkn all stars do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 6 hours ago, MJWalker45 said: It's sarcasm. I don't think Puma or UA would throw out enough cash to make Chelsea jump like this. UA might if it were confirmed next year is the final with Spurs, Puma tends to be the lowest bidder after Umbro. Puma's deal with Arsenal is £30M per year, the richest in English football. Nike had right of first refusal under the old deal, Adidas desperately wanted to add Arsenal to their stable, but Puma's bid blew them both out of the water. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pepis21 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 11 minutes ago, Gothamite said: Puma's deal with Arsenal is £30M per year, the richest in English football. Nope, United earn £ 75M per year from adidas. "Big" changes for Mainz: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimEOBrien Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 1 hour ago, pepis21 said: Nope, United earn £ 75M per year from adidas. Ill gladly stand corrected. But it was the largest deal at the time when it was signed. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/arsenal-agree-puma-kit-deal-1874661 The point is that Puma isn't necessarily a low-bid company. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berlin Wall Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Guess what. Umbro should also add Leeds, so I could finally buy me a Peacocks jersey. I'm a simple person, I have a pixelated David Beckham as profile photo since 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 10 minutes ago, Berlin Wall said: Guess what. Umbro should also add Leeds, so I could finally buy me a Peacocks jersey. Nike consistently failed to get the home kits right. This is a good move for them. 2 hours ago, pepis21 said: Nope, United earn £ 75M per year from adidas. "Big" changes for Mainz: If they're allowed to use bikes that might help them keep their legs! Hahahahaha!!!!! I had to do a double take at first because I thought it was another picture of Bayern's kit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 2 hours ago, TimEOBrien said: That ad looks like an adidas Chelsea add from a few years ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pepis21 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 2 hours ago, Gothamite said: Ill gladly stand corrected. But it was the largest deal at the time when it was signed. Yes, at this time it was the biggest deal. Another "Big" changes, this time AS Saint Etienne: Rest: http://www.footyheadlines.com/2016/05/as-saint-etienne-16-17-kits.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 4 hours ago, TimEOBrien said: What's with the midsection stripe? Is that going to be an Umbro thing now? I don't like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimEOBrien Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 I think it's a different panel on all the kits but it has a design on everton, linking it back to Goodison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 1 hour ago, pepis21 said: Yes, at this time it was the biggest deal. Another "Big" changes, this time AS Saint Etienne: Rest: http://www.footyheadlines.com/2016/05/as-saint-etienne-16-17-kits.html That's nice. I like that Saint-Étienne uses a light shade of green, it's a pleasant change of pace. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnPheitseog Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 2 minutes ago, Gothamite said: That's nice. I like that Saint-Étienne uses a light shade of green, it's a pleasant change of pace. I do like their green, and of le coq sportif in general. Wish more teams(including my beloved Marseille) would use them. I would find it fantastic, and hilarious, if Chelsea goes with them. Formerly known as DiePerske Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 34 minutes ago, TimEOBrien said: I think it's a different panel on all the kits but it has a design on everton, linking it back to Goodison. I just think the placement is awkward. Just like for the green-brown third kit Everton had last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berlin Wall Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 I knew they wouldn't go with yellow shorts. I'm a simple person, I have a pixelated David Beckham as profile photo since 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Real Madrid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asterix777 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 31 minutes ago, rsaline said: Real Madrid: Eh. Not bad, per se, but there's nothing eye-catching about it. it's good, just kinda boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 19 minutes ago, Asterix777 said: Eh. Not bad, per se, but there's nothing eye-catching about it. it's good, just kinda boring. That's par for the course for Real. I'm sure the second and third will be incredibly loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.