hockey week Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 "The Wild's jerseys are mismatched and that's terrible!""Colorado's [old] third jersey shouldn't have a wordmark down the chest, that's for the Rangers!""Winnipeg's logo is so basic and bland, it's just boring"And those same people love this:Nostalgia and good teams is the only explanation for this being loved. I'll respect any opinion that you can defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alecgoff Posted January 1, 2016 Share Posted January 1, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billc52865 Posted January 1, 2016 Share Posted January 1, 2016 Los Angeles Kings current logo. That crown is way too small! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 1, 2016 Share Posted January 1, 2016 And those same people love this:Large, diverse group of message board posters have diverse, contradictory opinions. Film at 11. Unless you can show that one person was making both of those arguments. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand Cesarano Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 It's considered to be one of the most iconic logos in sports, but it doesn't change the fact that it's poorly executed and horribly outdated.Couldn't agree more, I can't stand it. Besides the cartoonishness, it drives me nuts that the "I" reaches further than the "S" and that it goes into the island (unless I'm missing something creative there?). And because the "N" is cut off by the circle, it creates the optical illusion that the left part of the N is wider and taller than the right. With that said, I would love for them to keep with the theme of this logo and just update it to make it look more modern. It's classic but could use a serious makeover. You are. The I is pointing to where on the island Nassau Coliseum is located. But that's moot not that they play in Brooklyn.Which is why the Islanders should adopt this logo:Keeps the classic theme going, but adds Brooklyn and Queens back to Long Island and once again the I points to their home ice.That version of the logo, which was made by Discogod, is perfect. It completely retains the overall aesthetic, while making a subtle change that acknowledges reality. As you mentioned, the I in this proposed update points to the team's current home arena, just as the I in the current logo points to the forder arena. Also, this logo is superior to the actual one in that the first S is beautifully shadowed by Jamaica Bay in the map of the complete island.The team's failure to alter the logo to something like this is baffling and annoying. For that reason, I prefer the NY logo without the island that appears on the black jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand Cesarano Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 It's considered to be one of the most iconic logos in sports, but it doesn't change the fact that it's poorly executed and horribly outdated.Couldn't agree more, I can't stand it. Besides the cartoonishness, it drives me nuts that the "I" reaches further than the "S" and that it goes into the island (unless I'm missing something creative there?). And because the "N" is cut off by the circle, it creates the optical illusion that the left part of the N is wider and taller than the right. With that said, I would love for them to keep with the theme of this logo and just update it to make it look more modern. It's classic but could use a serious makeover. You are. The I is pointing to where on the island Nassau Coliseum is located. But that's moot not that they play in Brooklyn.Which is why the Islanders should adopt this logo:Keeps the classic theme going, but adds Brooklyn and Queens back to Long Island and once again the I points to their home ice.That version of the logo, which was made by Discogod, is perfect. It completely retains the overall aesthetic, while making a subtle change that acknowledges reality. As you mentioned, the I in this proposed update points to the team's current home arena, just as the I in the current logo points to the former arena. Also, this logo is superior to the actual one in that the first S is beautifully shadowed by Jamaica Bay in the map of the complete island.The team's failure to alter the logo to something like this is baffling and annoying. For that reason, I prefer the NY logo without the island that appears on the black jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroCree Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 These uniforms are only popular because they had success in these and won the world series. Then again, Mets had success in 1999 and 2000 in these and they are despised by many Met fans. I personally liked them, I thought the Mets were the only team that adopted the black color and made it work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrundi V. Bakshi Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 Then again, Mets had success in 1999 and 2000 in these and they are despised by many Met fans. I personally liked them, I thought the Mets were the only team that adopted the black color and made it work.That could be at least in part due to the fact that the Mets' classic unis and cap were a mashup of the NY Giants and Brooklyn Dodgers. Incorporating one of those team's primary colors was less likely to clash with the original scheme than the typical BFBS addition. And I do agree that the Mets' incorporation of black wasn't too bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresno St. Alum Posted January 11, 2016 Share Posted January 11, 2016 Maybe we need some fashion police who have no clue about sports to give us a real answer. Other than the Packers fitting a B in w/ the G within the oval and going to the 84-88 sleeves, we look pretty damn good. There may be a kick ass logo of a dude packing meat in a crate that would look awesome to someone who's never watched sports, and make the rest of us say, "uh no, that just aint the Packers". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 11, 2016 Share Posted January 11, 2016 Agreed - the Packers' look overall is great, but the logo only lasts because of its tie to Lombardi. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 On 1/9/2016 at 10:03 AM, Hrundi V. Bakshi said: That could be at least in part due to the fact that the Mets' classic unis and cap were a mashup of the NY Giants and Brooklyn Dodgers. Incorporating one of those team's primary colors was less likely to clash with the original scheme than the typical BFBS addition. And I do agree that the Mets' incorporation of black wasn't too bad. I thought the Mets' incorporation of black was awful, but that might have been due to its overuse and the excessive drop-shadowing. It was a very late-90s look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vercetti Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Sorry of its been added earlier, but these are growing on me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pabig Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 That's because those aren't bad uniforms at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.