Recommended Posts

Here's a stab at a Rockies re-brand I've been working on. CC appreciated:

rox2_zpsa5yn7ewi.png

rox1_zpsz7js71eb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TheLogoManiac13 said:

The 'C' is weird looking. Maybe use the 'C' on the Colorado flag.

Agreed.  I'm also not sure about the color scheme.  The purple blue and green don't well.  I'd try to replace one with a color that is a little bit warmer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the purple and green looks too 90's to me and the "C" does look a bit distorted, but I do like that wordmark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, RyanB03 said:

Yeah, the purple and green looks too 90's to me and the "C" does look a bit distorted, but I do like that wordmark.

Yeah they kinda remind of the Pre-Brick and Sand D'Backs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind the 90's-ness of it at all. The Rockies are a 90's expansion team, so I feel like it fits with the team's place on baseball's timeline. I do wonder what a Colorado script would look like though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the wordmark is the weakest part.  Too overly designed.  

 

The logo has promise.  Green, purple, and lighter silver (essentially the colors of the Coors Field stadium logo) could definitely work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a slight modification to the "C" by expanding the mountain to play off the angle of the end of the letter. This gives the "C" a fuller view, and provides depth as it winds in between the mountain. I also added the flying baseball as a nod to the original Rockies brand.

colo_zpsg7tcta27.png

I'm still not set on the color scheme, but for now it is okay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with the baseball is scale. Once you try to shrink that down on a cap or patch, there's no way they will be able embroider it because it is just too small. Either scale it up or take it off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, rsaline said:

The problem with the baseball is scale. Once you try to shrink that down on a cap or patch, there's no way they will be able embroider it because it is just too small. Either scale it up or take it off.

Absolutely, I am aware of this. This would be for the primary logo not cap or jersey. I do think I will enlarge though and play with this some more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, miltonANDlumbergh said:

I did a slight modification to the "C" by expanding the mountain to play off the angle of the end of the letter. This gives the "C" a fuller view, and provides depth as it winds in between the mountain. I also added the flying baseball as a nod to the original Rockies brand.

colo_zpsg7tcta27.png

I'm still not set on the color scheme, but for now it is okay.

This is a much better C, even though it's been driven into the ground, but it's now really right heavy. The mountains look like theyre falling out of the letter instead of being enclosed in it. If you could scoot them over to the left it would look better. That being said, maybe you could make the baseball wrap around the entire logo, not just the mountains. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea. This is just a prototype before I execute some different things. I'm going to try some variations on it. I decided to stick with the original colors for now, and when the package is complete I will mess with different combos:

rockiesrebrand16_zpsddjc6idz.png

rockiesrebrand162_zpsyxcbuo5y.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like this last version (bottom one).

I think the colour scheme is fine, don't need to move them back to 90s feel. (like original concept).

The ONLY issue I have is that when I see that font/shape "C", no matter the colour, and the addition of that great mountain, all I can think of is Cubs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely the bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this