Conrad. Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 1 hour ago, upperV03 said: the navy "Icon" uniform will probably have the same issue. Yep, same amount of green as the Association uniform, sadly. Red Goat Creations :: Graphic Design Solutions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funkatron101 Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Just now, Conrad. said: Yep, same amount of green as the Association uniform, sadly. Have they dropped the interlocking tree pattern from their branding? It sure seems like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teal Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Just now, Conrad. said: Yep, same amount of green as the Association uniform, sadly. Is there stiII a green uni? Jaguars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Noire Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 3 hours ago, Satomiblood said: The template isn't bad. It's just the blatant lack of green that bothers me. That's exactly it. A top 5 look with a green outline, stripe, or something. Why even introduce the new green and not use it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suns1977 Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 This reminds me of MLB and the overuse of colors, like red. Still not over my Dbacks going from purple and teal to "Sedona Red" for a bit. I was hoping we'd see NBA teams take chances and be brave with unique colors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teal Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 10 minutes ago, suns1977 said: This reminds me of MLB and the overuse of colors, like red. Still not over my Dbacks going from purple and teal to "Sedona Red" for a bit. I was hoping we'd see NBA teams take chances and be brave with unique colors. So true... Jaguars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funkatron101 Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 14 teams use blue as their primary color. 8 of those use navy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Looks like an old timey bathing suit that Grandpa Simpson would wear. Not a fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsfan1 Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 This. On 8/8/2017 at 0:36 PM, Lights Out said: The Timberwolves had it right here, and every change since then has been a downgrade: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 The Timberwolves have always been a bottom-feeder organization. What did anyone expect of them? ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsfan1 Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 So Minnesota removed all stripes which contained the pine tree pattern, took the Wizards uniform template, and click/filled the template with Dallas colors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzcut Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 2 hours ago, Bucfan56 said: If that really is their new look, they just dropped to the very bottom of the entire league. It isn't even close 1-29. Not the Timberwolves 30. Timberwolves The narrowness of the gap is exaggerated. I am not risking a ban for making it any bigger than needed. The CCSLC's resident Geelong Cats fan. Viva La Vida or Death And All His Friends. Sounds like something from a Rocky & Bullwinkle story arc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primzahl Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 At this point Minnesota should just drop the 'Timber' part of their name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeFrank Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Holy hell these are bad (if accurate). Everything about the Timberwolves redesign was backwards. Not to get too whatever here but "timber" and "wolves" are like two really cool words! They make me think of fresh air, snow, the night sky, and a deep green forest. How the hell did we end up with navy and the greeniest green imaginable? With no tree patterns! I feel similarly about the "sea" "hawks." concepts: washington football (2017) ... nfl (2013) ... yikes potd 10/20/12 origin story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primzahl Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 I can think of a few teams those jerseys would work with, but the Wolves aren't one of em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kroywen Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 5 minutes ago, Primzahl said: At this point Minnesota should just drop the 'Timber' part of their name. Totally agree. "Minnesota Wolves" sounds so much better than "Minnesota Timberwolves." I've always been of the opinion that if you can't fit your nickname on the front of a jersey reasonably, it's probably too long and clunky of a name. (Looking at you, D-Backs.) The Supersonics were probably the one exception. Wolves is a great name that incredibly isn't used by any other professional teams. Ditch the clunky compound adjective and just go with "Wolves." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Minnesota is an interesting branding case to me because while baseball and hockey combined with Minnesota's innate Minnesotaness compel a real old-school approach, I think there's a lot more latitude to try different stuff with the basketball team. I wouldn't mind the Timberwolves going off the wall. I can't tell whether this is. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockstar Matt Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 I actually like the uniforms, but they'd look good for Dallas. Not Minnesota. Cowboys - Lakers - LAFC - USMNT - LA Rams - LA Kings - NUFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorMade Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 55 minutes ago, kroywen said: Totally agree. "Minnesota Wolves" sounds so much better than "Minnesota Timberwolves." I've always been of the opinion that if you can't fit your nickname on the front of a jersey reasonably, it's probably too long and clunky of a name. (Looking at you, D-Backs.) The Supersonics were probably the one exception. Wolves is a great name that incredibly isn't used by any other professional teams. Ditch the clunky compound adjective and just go with "Wolves." Because Seattle never had a jersey that said "Supersonics." I guess you could have said the same thing about them, that they should have just dropped the "super" from their name. They didn't even have it in their logo past 1995. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadojoker Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 6 hours ago, DJT said: New wolves shorts. So seeming like no green at all except a tad on the logo. Too bad. Just realized why Wiggins leaked the team's new Nike shorts. Look no further than his shirt. He is signed to Adidas. Troll level 90! Ps. I'm still trying to figure out when,why and how we go from the uniforms having the subliminal tree side panels design...to these?? We had good sources confirm them. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.