mckennamets Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 I decided to have a little fun with a cool bowling ball design and place it inside a Grateful Dead Logo, I thought the swirl on the bowling ball fit well. tell me what you all think. And yes I know St.Louis is LA, but I got what they had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDR Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 This is an exceptionally random concept series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoGTS Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 So you use logos that have been out of circulation for a while (Jags, Panthers), yet you point out the Rams...... Facebook: CustomSportsCovers Twitter: CSCovers Quote No because when the Irish came to Ireland and first came in contact with the leprechaun people, they didn't take their land away and force them to move west. Instead, the two groups learned to assimilate peacefully. However, certain tribes of the leprechaun refused to taint the pure blood and moved north into the forests of Ireland, only to be seen rarely, usually at the same time of a rainbows appearance and occasionally at the factories of Lucky Charms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mckennamets Posted May 14, 2016 Author Share Posted May 14, 2016 18 minutes ago, DDR said: This is an exceptionally random concept series. It seems to be a very common mashup, started with the SF Giants, not sure if your comment is a criticism or a compliment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mckennamets Posted May 14, 2016 Author Share Posted May 14, 2016 11 minutes ago, TornadoGTS said: So you use logos that have been out of circulation for a while (Jags, Panthers), yet you point out the Rams...... 11 minutes ago, TornadoGTS said: So you use logos that have been out of circulation for a while (Jags, Panthers), yet you point out the Rams...... I knew going in I was going to deal with the die hards, none of the logos here are official, they were included on the bowling balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, mckennamets said: I knew going in I was going to deal with the die hards, The Jags and The Panthers logo is pretty much the same minus the word mark, at least they are still in the same city Diehards? Even the most casual fan can tell the Jags got a new logo. This seems pretty lazy, some teams have their new logos while others have outdated logos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mckennamets Posted May 14, 2016 Author Share Posted May 14, 2016 7 minutes ago, rickyISking said: Diehards? Even the most casual fan can tell the Jags got a new logo. This seems pretty lazy, some teams have their new logos while others have outdated logos. Like I said, The bowling ball site had the logos on the balls, I just thought the matchup with the swirl of the ball and the Dead was cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDR Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 28 minutes ago, mckennamets said: It seems to be a very common mashup, started with the SF Giants, not sure if your comment is a criticism or a compliment It's neither. I didn't see the SF Giants/bowling ball/Grateful Dead mashup concept. If I had, I would've thought that concept was random, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mckennamets Posted May 14, 2016 Author Share Posted May 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, DDR said: It's neither. I didn't see the SF Giants/bowling ball/Grateful Dead mashup concept. If I had, I would've thought that concept was random, too. I meant the sports logo or other logos inside the Steal Your Face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand Cesarano Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 These would be stronger without the wordmarks. The ones that best exemplify this principle are those for the Jets and the Raiders. While those logos themselves include the teams' names, they are free from a separate wordmark. Consider how much cleaner in particular the ones for Saints, the 49ers, and the Packers would be without the wordmark. The wordmarks appear extraneous on the ones for the Giants, the Cardinals, the Steelers, and, most especially, the Panthers. The weakest ones are those that are dominated by the wordmark, such as the ones for the Eagles and the Patriots. Great work, and a great concept. But it would be improved greatly by the removal of that one element of the wordmark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mckennamets Posted May 14, 2016 Author Share Posted May 14, 2016 4 hours ago, Ferdinand Cesarano said: These would be stronger without the wordmarks. The ones that best exemplify this principle are those for the Jets and the Raiders. While those logos themselves include the teams' names, they are free from a separate wordmark. Consider how much cleaner in particular the ones for Saints, the 49ers, and the Packers would be without the wordmark. The wordmarks appear extraneous on the ones for the Giants, the Cardinals, the Steelers, and, most especially, the Panthers. The weakest ones are those that are dominated by the wordmark, such as the ones for the Eagles and the Patriots. Great work, and a great concept. But it would be improved greatly by the removal of that one element of the wordmark. Thank you for the input, this was my first submission and first attempt, I will consider that and improve for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.