dherrera_96

2016 NFL Season week by week uniform match-up combos

Recommended Posts

Regular Season Week 17 (Part3)
Cowboys @ Eagles
ujr821B.jpggDPRye5.jpg
Browns @ Steelers
QWvE27i.jpggt6xKh6.jpg
Cardinals @ Rams
cmSvh9b.jpgCqwoTBt.jpg
Raiders @ Broncos
OPYpbd2.jpgfHT1JHx.jpg
Chiefs @ Chargers
JlEheB2.jpgxxhzR3K.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, daveindc said:

 

 

Black pants are the proper ones for the Ravens' black alts. White pants are pointless, and just ruins their unique and popular look.

 

130116-004-B72EBFDB.jpgtempEagles121816sh10WEB--nfl_mezz_1280_1

 

 

 

 

 

We're gonna have to disagree to disagree. I'm not a fan of mono looks. Especially when there's no contrasting socks. And what makes the Ravens even worse is the yoga pants. Get a stripe on the pants and purple socks (or even white and purple stripes on the black socks) and I can live with them once per year, and white pants the other time the black jerseys are worn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That New York Giants Color Rush uniform looks very badass. They should bring that look back fulltime, with a matching white jersey (and blue socks, too). :D

Their AFC counterparts, the Jets, might want to also resurrect their 1980s jerseys and helmets well (and bring back white shoes, as an homage to Joe Namath). :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have the Vikings worn all purple yet this season not counting color rush? If not I would think they would wear them week 17.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, s3ahawkz said:

Have the Vikings worn all purple yet this season not counting color rush? If not I would think they would wear them week 17.

They haven't worn all purple in their new uniforms since 2013 against the packers1383199506000-AP-Packers-Vikings-Footbal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DouglasQuaid said:

They haven't worn all purple in their new uniforms since 2013 against the packers1383199506000-AP-Packers-Vikings-Footbal

Oh I don't know why I always thought they only wore them once a year. They should do it once a year though that would be better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said:

Um - if the Saints also wear all black, as did the 49ers, it is no longer 'unique'.  That word has meaning.

 

If you mean the bird being unique, crows need to talk with you.

 

 

Unique as in the all-black look actually fits their brand. Those other teams would just be all-black for all-black sake.

 

 

20 hours ago, VikWings said:

 

We're gonna have to disagree to disagree. I'm not a fan of mono looks. Especially when there's no contrasting socks. And what makes the Ravens even worse is the yoga pants. Get a stripe on the pants and purple socks (or even white and purple stripes on the black socks) and I can live with them once per year, and white pants the other time the black jerseys are worn.

 

 

The "yoga pants" are perfect for the all-black look. It doesn't look like yoga pants here. The pants and socks don't need stripes for stripes sake. If they add stripes to the pants, purple is the only option. No stripes still looks better here.

 

 

21 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said:

"Looks good" is definitely a matter of opinion. I think you could make an all black uniform that looks decent but IMO the Ravens have not done so. Not with those  awful stripeless yoga pants and black socks.

 

And as for unique... I could post pictures of a few dozen college teams that would blow that claim out of the water.  In 2016 the all black football uniform is about as cliched and played out as anything in sports.

 

 

This is an NFL thread and I'm talking NFL teams. And these are all obviously opinions, but most opinions on the Ravens all-black look I've heard and seen on social media have been positive.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, daveindc said:

Unique as in the all-black look actually fits their brand. Those other teams would just be all-black for all-black sake.

 

But that isn't what 'unique' means.

 

adjective
 
  1. 1.
    being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else.
    "the situation was unique in modern politics"

 

Had you stated that their all black uniform was fitting as it was more like a Raven, well, then the criticism would have gone in the direction of the Eagles not wearing white helmets with yellow facemasks and the Bears not wearing Brown.  Regardless, if words are used, they need to be used based on what they mean, lest we be unable to communicate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm the only one, but I strongly feel that the Ravens should never wear white pants. They throw off the balance of the uniform. Their black pants look fantastic with all three jerseys:

 

BHw1yIC.jpg

 

bFUnPbF.jpg

 

OzX2JgF.jpg

 

I do agree that the "yoga pants" look sucks, though. They need purple socks to wear with the black pants. I would also love to see a purple shimmer effect on their helmets and (if possible) the pants like the Jaguars had with their old teal-flaked helmets:

 

tlMUyQY.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said:

By this logic, we need to get the Eagles into brown pants and jerseys, and a white helmet with a yellow mask.

 

Bald_Eagle_Portrait.jpg

 

 

 

 

AJUNK_zpslpyu0vkr.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said:

But that isn't what 'unique' means.

 

adjective
 
  1. 1.
    being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else.
    "the situation was unique in modern politics"

 

Had you stated that their all black uniform was fitting as it was more like a Raven, well, then the criticism would have gone in the direction of the Eagles not wearing white helmets with yellow facemasks and the Bears not wearing Brown.  Regardless, if words are used, they need to be used based on what they mean, lest we be unable to communicate.

 

Again, the Ravens are the only team in the NFL that has an all-black look that actually fits their brand and is not all-black for all-black sake. They are unique in this regard. This is what the whole discussion is about... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oldschoolvikings said:

 

 

AJUNK_zpslpyu0vkr.png

 

Coming to Thursday Nights next fall it's NFL Nature Rush  where each week all teams wear the true natural colors of their mascots. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, daveindc said:

 

Again, the Ravens are the only team in the NFL that has an all-black look that actually fits their brand and is not all-black for all-black sake. They are unique in this regard. This is what the whole discussion is about... 

Really?

IMG_3262.JPG

IMG_3263.JPG

IMG_3264.JPG

IMG_3265.JPG

IMG_3266.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dont care said:

Really?

IMG_3262.JPG

IMG_3263.JPG

IMG_3264.JPG

IMG_3265.JPG

IMG_3266.JPG

 

 

 

"All-black for all-black sake". The Ravens' all-black is not. It fits their brand. This is the whole point of the discussion...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.