Jump to content

NFL 2017 changes?


Buffalo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BrandMooreArt said:

 

right, but why the post?

To show that the Rams might be going navy and white? I know it's been like that all the season but the guy who made the post may not know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hawk36 said:

The "F" is something that drives me crazy. No need for it, especially when it's a backward "F" on one side of the helmet and jersey. Give up trying to force an "F" shape and make a better looking logo. 

 

nike_elite_51_uniform_falcons.jpeg

 

Those old Bucs unis tho... RIP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ice_Cap said:

To show that the Rams might be going navy and white? I know it's been like that all the season but the guy who made the post may not know that.

this. Thanks, yeah I never noticed until today. sorry, carry on! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, hawk36 said:

The "F" is something that drives me crazy. No need for it, especially when it's a backward "F" on one side of the helmet and jersey. Give up trying to force an "F" shape and make a better looking logo. 

 

nike_elite_51_uniform_falcons.jpeg

Yes, its an F. The original was an F. Why should we drop 51 years of a stylized F? If we made it a 3/4 view we'd look just like the old Eagles logo. If we did just the head we'd look like the ugly child of the Ravens and Cards. It works for us and there's no reason to change it. Beyond that, we just made the wings pattern part of our new stadium section design in the open east end. So sorry y'all but you're stuck with it. Change the jerseys but the logo is staying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new Falcons logo is great to me. Both old and new make for :censored:ty Fs but that's irrelevant to me. What's the point of it being an F anyway? We can see that it's a Falcon. It'd be more interesting if it was an A instead.

 

But the F isn't so explicit as to be distracting. As logos the new one seems like a perfect, sleek update to the old, more static (as mentioned) logo. The old one is cool but I much prefer the current look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.