TaylorMade Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Is that the NASL logo above the NOB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorMade Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 15 minutes ago, hawk36 said: LOVE THEM! White socks I hope... Yep. On gameday it will be worn as a white top, white shorts and white socks with blue stripes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 11 minutes ago, upperV03 said: the sponsor logo should be black like the name and numbers. I totally agree and actually thought it was black. If pacific blue, that's a bad look. Bummer. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorMade Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, hawk36 said: I totally agree and actually thought it was black. If pacific blue, that's a bad look. Bummer. It actually looks darker than both the cyan and the Sounder blue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Just now, TaylorMade said: It actually looks darker than both the cyan and the Sounder blue Even more of an issue. A new blue that isn't either of the other 2 blues. What's going on? Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upperV03 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Just now, TaylorMade said: It actually looks darker than both the cyan and the Sounder blue I'm pretty sure it's pacific blue: In their release video, it appeared either black or a darker blue, but the images seem to show that it's pacific blue. But still, it should be black to match the names and numbers. As it is now, it clashes. Like I said, the pacific blue just doesn't go with the rest of the kit and four different accent colors is just too much for such a simple kit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upperV03 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 In other news, the new Toronto home shirt leaked, and it's different than what was initially suspected: It's not great, especially because it looks like there are dark gray side panels, but it's certainly much better than a plain all red shirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 1 hour ago, upperV03 said: 1 hour ago, TaylorMade said: Is that the NASL logo above the NOB? No, it's the old club's logo. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorMade Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Gothamite said: No, it's the old club's logo. That's what I meant. The club logo from the NASL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 57 minutes ago, upperV03 said: I'm pretty sure it's pacific blue: In their release video, it appeared either black or a darker blue, but the images seem to show that it's pacific blue. But still, it should be black to match the names and numbers. As it is now, it clashes. Like I said, the pacific blue just doesn't go with the rest of the kit and four different accent colors is just too much for such a simple kit. Why is the new shirt so much longer than the other two? Real or just the photo? Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, hawk36 said: Why is the new shirt so much longer than the other two? Real or just the photo? Adidas does have a lot of variation in the sizes, but that looks to me like it's just the photo. Look at how much lower the shoulders are on that mannequin. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 7 minutes ago, TaylorMade said: That's what I meant. The club logo from the NASL. Duh. Of course you did. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 1 minute ago, Gothamite said: Adidas does have a lot of variation in the sizes, but that looks to me like it's just the photo. Look at how much lower the shoulders are on that mannequin. Yes, just worries me as the other two sit nicely over the shorts but the white, sitting so far down, looks a bit sloppy. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Meh, they're ok. I would've liked to see a front number to really give a shoutout to the old kit, but these work pretty well. I mean, it's a white soccer jersey with a collar. A bit underwhelming, but not bad by any stretch. I do like the inclusion of the old logo on the back, though. That's a nice touch. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upperV03 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, hawk36 said: Yes, just worries me as the other two sit nicely over the shorts but the white, sitting so far down, looks a bit sloppy. I really don't think you have anything to worry about. I mean, you're judging it by how it looks in a mockup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 2 hours ago, upperV03 said: It's a pretty nice kit overall, but I feel like they botched the execution a little bit, and I'm not saying that just because I'm a Timbers fan. Using the current shade of blue on the crest, MLS logos, and XBOX logos clashes pretty badly with all of the cyan accents. On top of that, the name and number color not matching the color of the Adidas logo OR the sponsor logo bugs the hell out of me. Plus, they really should've gone with cyan shorts. It would also look much better without that gold star above the crest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joob Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 1 hour ago, upperV03 said: In other news, the new Toronto home shirt leaked, and it's different than what was initially suspected: It's not great, especially because it looks like there are dark gray side panels, but it's certainly much better than a plain all red shirt. I think it's pretty nice and sort of different for a change (not entirely red like last season). Not really excited about those subtle hoops and the texture, but those onyx sleeves look cool. It would be interesting to see if the shorts are onyx too, but I doubt they'll do that. www.juliandodaro.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Digby Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I'm really confused about which color shade is which with all the marketing names for them, but basically I agree that it's absurd the number/sponsor mismatches and the crest/trim mismatches are as bad as they appear here. I think it could have used a monochrome crest and/or some green to balance it out. Not to toot my own horn here, but essentially I think they should have done my exact concept from a month or so ago, honestly. On the note about MLS printing -- hard to believe that whoever is in charge of creating the iron-ons for names and numbers couldn't whip up something that matches the new Seattle away, if they wanted it. Given that we've had reflective silver for Kansas City's third, bright orange for NYCFC's away and even kelly green for Portland's old white third, I thought the days of limited color choices were behind us? Fan Style ShirtsShowcasing fan-made sports apparel by artists and designers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nas1787 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I'd take last year's TFC home kit over that any day. I could live with the sleeves (as long as they are onyx and not black) but the side panels are really going to ruin it. I'd rather have last year's classic look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Knew I'd seen that TFC kit before. I'd say the old one is better than this new one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.