RyanMcD29 Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 I'm gonna go a little against the grain with this pointless realignment... TV contracts. Not teams.I was kind of thinking about this with the NFL TV deal. Shaking this up year to year kind of like the MLB and NBA postseason deals. Each year the Super Bowl network would have the Sunday night package as well as the Saturday Wild Card doubleheader and the other two will swap the AFC and NFC. So it would go as followsSuper Bowl, SNF: NBCAFC: CBSNFC: FOXSuper Bowl, SNF: CBSAFC: FOXNFC: NBCSuper Bowl, SNF: FoxAFC: NBCNFC: CBS (talk about nostalgic with that lineup of the AFC on NBC and NFC on CBS)Rinse, lather, repeat. Also, ESPN would retain Monday Night Football and Thursday Night Football would either remain on NFL Network or move to Versus or whatever the NFL's heart desires in real life in the coming years. I don't think it's that plausible with production costs and the like, but the NFL's one huge moneymaker so who knows. Once again I don't think there's any chance in hell of the NFL doing this, but it's an interesting concept nonetheless. Quote Twitter: @RyanMcD29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashcarson15 Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 I've come up with a cool idea for an NBA re-alignment, provided that two more teams enter the league (Kansas City expansion franchise and revival of the Sonics). This would necessitate one team moving east, with Memphis being the likely candidate.WEST:California Division: Lakers, Clippers, Kings, WarriorsNorthwest Division: Sonics, Blazers, Nuggets, JazzSouthwest Division: Suns, Mavs, Spurs, RocketsMidwest Division: Wolves, Thunder, Kansas City team, HornetsEAST:Northeast Division: Celtics, Knicks, Raptors, Nets (or whatever their name will be in a couple years)Mid-Atlantic Divison: Cavs, Wizards, Bobcats, SixersCentral Division: Bulls, Pistons, Bucks, PacersSoutheast Division: Magic, Heat, Grizzlies, HawksPersonally, I'd send the Wolves east, because they're on an island in the West currently, where Memphis has OKC and NO close nearby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH42XCC Posted September 25, 2010 Share Posted September 25, 2010 Had the USFL and/or the XFL merged with the NFL, this is what the NFL would look like:AMERICAN FOOTBALL CONFERENCEEASTBaltimore Ravens (formerly Philadelphia/Baltimore Stars)Buffalo BillsMiami DolphinsNew England PatriotsNew York JetsNORTHChicago EnforcersCincinnati BengalsCleveland BrownsIndianapolis ColtsPittsburgh SteelersSOUTHBirmingham StallionsHouston TexansJacksonville BullsOklahoma City Bandits (moved from Tampa Bay)Tennessee TitansWESTDenver BroncosKansas City ChiefsLas Vegas Gamblers (merged with Houston Gamblers and later merged with XFL's Las Vegas Outlaws)Oakland RaidersSan Diego ChargersNATIONAL FOOTBALL CONFERENCEEASTDallas CowboysNew York GiantsOrlando RenegadesPhiladelphia EaglesWashington RedskinsNORTHChicago BearsColumbus Generals (moved from New Jersey)Detroit LionsGreen Bay PackersMinnesota VikingsSOUTHAtlanta FalconsCarolina PanthersMemphis ShowboatsNew Orleans SaintsTampa Bay BuccaneersWESTArizona CardinalsLos Angeles ExpressSt. Louis RamsSan Francisco 49ersSeattle Seahawks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockstar Matt Posted September 27, 2010 Share Posted September 27, 2010 I was watching an English Premier League Game, and the thought came to me... what if the NFL combined with the CFL (Canadian) and the UFL to make two leagues with consistent promotion and relegation between the two.32 NFL teams + 8 CFL teams + 6 UFL Teams = 46 "New" NFL teams.The 1st season would have the Main league "dubbed the NFL" have 24 teams(Everything based off of 2009 standings for the NFL. CFL and UFL teams automatically put in the 2nd League) AFCEast:New England PatriotsNew York JetsBaltimore RavensNorth:Cincinnati BengalsPittsburgh SteelersIndianapolis ColtsSouth:Houston TexansTennessee TitansMiami DolphinsWest:San Diego ChargersDenver BroncosOakland RaidersNFCEast:Philadelphia EaglesNew York GiantsCarolina PanthersSouth:New Orleans SaintsDallas CowboysAtlanta FalconsNorth:Minnesota VikingsGreen Bay PackersChicago BearsWest:Arizona CardinalsSan Francisco 49ersSeattle Seahawks_____________________2nd League will be split into two 11-team conferencesEast:Buffalo BillsWashington RedskinsJacksonville JaguarsTampa Bay BuccaneersHamilton Tiger-CatsToronto ArgonautsMontreal AlouettesWinnipeg Blue BombersFlorida TuskersHartford ColonialsUFL VirginiaWest:St. Louis RamsKansas City ChiefsDetroit LionsCleveland BrownsCalgary StampedersBC LionsEdmonton Eskimos Saskatchewan RoughridersLas Vegas LocomotivesSacramento Mountain LionsOmaha Nighthawks Quote Cowboys - Lakers - LAFC - USMNT - LA Rams - LA Kings - NUFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockstar Matt Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 This next part is an example of how the relegation and promotion system works:AFCEast:New England Patriots 12-4New York Jets 10-6Baltimore Ravens 8-8North:Cincinnati Bengals 9-7Pittsburgh Steelers 13-3Indianapolis Colts 11-5South:Houston Texans 11-5Tennessee Titans 9-7Miami Dolphins 8-8West:San Diego Chargers 10-6Denver Broncos 8-8Oakland Raiders 7-9NFCEast:Philadelphia Eagles 11-5New York Giants 9-7Carolina Panthers 6-10South:New Orleans Saints 12-4Dallas Cowboys 12-4Atlanta Falcons 11-5North:Minnesota Vikings 10-6Green Bay Packers 9-7Chicago Bears 5-11West:Arizona Cardinals 9-7San Francisco 49ers 8-8Seattle Seahawks 4-12AFC PLAYOFF SEEDINGS (Four Divisional Winners guaranteed a spot, but seeding is based on purely record. Like normal, playoffs determine the Champion)1. Steelers2. Patriots3. Colts4. Texans5. Chargers6. JetsNFC PLAYOFF SEEDINGS1. Saints2. Cowboys3. Falcons4. Eagles5. Vikings6. Cardinals____________________________________NFL TEAMS THAT ARE RELEGATED:(Four teams from each Conference)AFC RELEGATED TEAMS:Raiders, Dolphins, Broncos, Ravens.NFC RELEGATED TEAMS:Seahawks, 49ers, Bears, Panthers._____________________________League 2East:Buffalo Bills 10-6Washington Redskins 13-3Jacksonville Jaguars 11-5Tampa Bay Buccaneers 7-9Hamilton Tiger-Cats 8-8Toronto Argonauts 4-12Montreal Alouettes 13-3Winnipeg Blue BombersFlorida Tuskers 9-7Hartford Colonials 2-14UFL Virginia 0-16West:St. Louis Rams 11-5Kansas City Chiefs 13-3Detroit Lions 12-4Cleveland Browns 8-8Calgary Stampeders 9-7BC Lions 7-9Edmonton Eskimos 6-10Saskatchewan Roughriders 8-8Las Vegas Locomotives 9-7Sacramento Mountain Lions 5-11Omaha Nighthawks 3-13(Top 6 teams in each conference advance to the playoffs.)EAST PLAYOFF SEEDINGS (Again, based on regular-season standings):1. Washington Redskins2. Montreal Aloulettes 3. Jacksonville Jaguars4. Buffalo Bills5. Florida Tuskers6. Hamilton Tiger-CatsWEST PLAYOFF SEEDINGS1. Kansas City Chiefs2. Detroit Lions3. St. Louis Rams4. Calgary Stampeders 5. Las Vegas Locomotives6. Cleveland BrownsPLAYOFFS (Normal NFL Format.1st Round:Jaguars 31, Tiger-Cats 27Tuskers 24, Bills 21Rams 34, Browns 13Stampeders 35, Locomotives 32 OT2nd Round: (all teams that made it to the 2nd round are promoted.)Alouettes 41, Jaguars 23Redskins 38, Tuskers 30Rams 31, Lions 30Chiefs 21, Stampeders 9Conference Championships (Each Conference Champion is guaranteed Promotion as well as the runner-up):Rams 23, Chiefs 20Redskins 35, Alouettes 21LEAGUE TWO TITLE GAME:Redskins 37, Rams 6 <--- (Both guaranteed promotion)LEAGUE TWO PROMOTED TEAMS:Redskins, Stampeders, Rams, Alouettes, Jaguars, Rams, Lions, Chiefs, Tuskers.New NFL Teams and where they are placed the following season.Italics denote promoted teams.AFCEast:New England PatriotsNew York JetsFlorida TuskersNorth:Cincinnati BengalsPittsburgh SteelersIndianapolis ColtsSouth:Houston TexansTennessee TitansJacksonville JaguarsWest:San Diego ChargersKansas City ChiefsCalgary StampedersNFCEast:Philadelphia EaglesNew York GiantsWashington RedskinsSouth:New Orleans SaintsDallas CowboysAtlanta FalconsNorth:Minnesota VikingsGreen Bay PackersDetroit LionsWest:Arizona CardinalsSt. Louis RamsMontreal Alouettes New League Two placement of teams:East:Miami DolphinsChicago BearsCarolina PanthersBaltimore RavensBuffalo BillsTampa Bay BuccaneersHamilton Tiger-CatsToronto ArgonautsWinnipeg Blue BombersHartford ColonialsUFL VirginiaWest:Oakland RaidersDenver BroncosSeattle SeahawksSan Francisco 49ersCleveland BrownsBC LionsEdmonton Eskimos Saskatchewan RoughridersLas Vegas LocomotivesSacramento Mountain LionsOmaha Nighthawks Quote Cowboys - Lakers - LAFC - USMNT - LA Rams - LA Kings - NUFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Interesting concept, although with the differences between CFL and NFL rules, I think it might be hard to mix the two.Personally I think the NHL teams that are hemorrhaging (sp?) money should be demoted to the AHL and the best-performing AHL teams should take their place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZapRowsdower8 Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 They were doing pointless realignment on Mike and Mike this morning. They were saying that there are rumors the NBA might contract two teams, Greenberg suggested Memphis and Toronto, he then goes on to suggest that the other leagues (possible exception to the NFL) do the same. His plan for MLB would be to contract Tampa Bay and Oakland, move the Brewers back to the AL along with Arizona and institute interleague play throughout the season.Anybody heard these NBA rumors anywhere else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Interesting concept, although with the differences between CFL and NFL rules, I think it might be hard to mix the two.Personally I think the NHL teams that are hemorrhaging (sp?) money should be demoted to the AHL and the best-performing AHL teams should take their place.Explain how this works - you're going to tell a bunch of guys that they're now minor-league players? And promote a bunch of guys who aren't good enough? Or are you talking just about the cities, and the AHL players would all move to the former-NHL city, while the NHL players would become the new Hershey Bears (just as an example). Quote "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Just the cities would trade leagues. The players currently on the NHL team in Atlanta would play in Chicago's Allstate Arena, and the farm team would move to Atlanta. If the New York area can support 3 teams, and the L.A. area has 2, I think Chicago can support 2 as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Just the cities would trade leagues. The players currently on the NHL team in Atlanta would play in Chicago's Allstate Arena, and the farm team would move to Atlanta. If the New York area can support 3 teams, and the L.A. area has 2, I think Chicago can support 2 as well.You'd think that, but you are wrong. There's not enough " the Blackhawks" sentiment in the city to make a second team a truly viable option. At least at the NHL level. Quote On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 They were doing pointless realignment on Mike and Mike this morning. They were saying that there are rumors the NBA might contract two teams, Greenberg suggested Memphis and Toronto, he then goes on to suggest that the other leagues (possible exception to the NFL) do the same. His plan for MLB would be to contract Tampa Bay and Oakland, move the Brewers back to the AL along with Arizona and institute interleague play throughout the season.Anybody heard these NBA rumors anywhere else?For the NBA, it's at least mentioned on ESPN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eye Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 They were doing pointless realignment on Mike and Mike this morning. They were saying that there are rumors the NBA might contract two teams, Greenberg suggested Memphis and Toronto, he then goes on to suggest that the other leagues (possible exception to the NFL) do the same. His plan for MLB would be to contract Tampa Bay and Oakland, move the Brewers back to the AL along with Arizona and institute interleague play throughout the season.Anybody heard these NBA rumors anywhere else?Why would they contract Toronto? They have a good fanbase in Canada, right?If contraction were to happen, I'd for sure say New Jersey, but since they are moving to Brooklyn, that isn't an option. So keep 'em around or something, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Just the cities would trade leagues. The players currently on the NHL team in Atlanta would play in Chicago's Allstate Arena, and the farm team would move to Atlanta. If the New York area can support 3 teams, and the L.A. area has 2, I think Chicago can support 2 as well.You'd think that, but you are wrong. There's not enough " the Blackhawks" sentiment in the city to make a second team a truly viable option. At least at the NHL level.Perhaps. Mostly I just want the Sun Belt NHL teams to disappear. Wisconsin could use an NHL team too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Just the cities would trade leagues. The players currently on the NHL team in Atlanta would play in Chicago's Allstate Arena, and the farm team would move to Atlanta. If the New York area can support 3 teams, and the L.A. area has 2, I think Chicago can support 2 as well.You'd think that, but you are wrong. There's not enough " the Blackhawks" sentiment in the city to make a second team a truly viable option. At least at the NHL level.Perhaps. Mostly I just want the Sun Belt NHL teams to disappear. Wisconsin could use an NHL team too.Oh, you're one of those guys. Quote On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsFanBudMan Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 A few years ago there might have been an opportunity for a second NHL team to steal some fans from the Blackhawks, since the AHL's Wolves could even outdraw them (even head to head on a Sunday afternoon at least once) and probably had more games on TV due to the franchise's ban on televised home games. However, the theory that Chicago was a sleeping giant hockey town proved to be true even before the Blackhawks' run to the conference finals in 2008-09 -- a season which featured a stunning jolt to attendance thanks to a heavy marketing push by the team that convinced people to go to Cubs games for all those years. Now that they have a two-season string of sellouts and hold the Cup, all former and casual fans -- and then some -- are likely spoken for. Certainly this city can support a second team in more than just MLB, but I'd like to see that be an NFL team in a state-of-the-art stadium that can host Super Bowls. (Don't forget the Grizzlies were almost headed to south suburban Dixmoor -- my 2nd reference to that in as many days here.) I think the Bulls and Blackhawks are likely set at the United Center for a while still, but that Soldier Field renovation has to be one of the most short-sighted of all-time. Even the Cubs should probably rebuild the Wrigley grandstand from scratch like they did the bleachers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 The sports demographics are too crystallized. Chicago can support two baseball teams because it's had two baseball teams for over a hundred years. Any second team in another sport is way too late to the party to make any worthwhile inroads in an exceedingly provincial region. Anyone who isn't a Bears fan is a Packers fan, and there's only shame in abandoning either one for the Jaguars or something. "Likely set at the United Center for a while" is a vast understatement considering the anchor tenants own the real estate and make lots of money off it. Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsFanBudMan Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 True, but I always thought a stadium in the right suburb could make it work. I just haven't identified which one that would be, but maybe a city could surprise me, as Bridgeview did on a much smaller scale with Fire.As far as the United Center, I agree, but despite the fact that I still feel it is top of the line, it just seems 16 years old isn't far away from the "we need a new stadium talk." OK, maybe only halfway there. The United Center name might be on its way out when the deal expires in 2014, based on the prominent Madhouse rebranding last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyRock Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Dan Patrick: With the first nine months of the Baseketball postseason out of the way, the playoff picture is starting to emerge.Kenny Mayne: So, with last night's victory over Boston, next week the Milwaukee Beers must beat Indianapolis in order to advance to Charlotte. That's in an effort to reduce their magic number to three.Dan Patrick: Right, and then the Beers can advance to the National Eastern Division North to play Tampa.Kenny Mayne: So, if the Beers beat Detroit and Denver beats Atlanta in the American Southwestern Division East Northern, then Milwaukee goes to the Denslow Cup, unless Baltimore can upset Buffalo and Charlotte ties Toronto, then Oakland would play LA and Pittsburgh in a blind choice round robin. And if no clear winner emerges from all of this, a two-man sack race will be held on consecutive Sundays until a champion can be crowned.Dan Patrick: Right. Quote New York Jets |3-3| First, AFC EastNew York Mets |74-88| Fourth, NL EastNew York Islanders|34-37-11| Fifth, Atlantic DivisionNew Orleans Hornets |21-45| Third, Southwest Division Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omnivore Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 True, but I always thought a stadium in the right suburb could make it work. I just haven't identified which one that would be, but maybe a city could surprise me, as Bridgeview did on a much smaller scale with Fire.As far as the United Center, I agree, but despite the fact that I still feel it is top of the line, it just seems 16 years old isn't far away from the "we need a new stadium talk." OK, maybe only halfway there. The United Center name might be on its way out when the deal expires in 2014, based on the prominent Madhouse rebranding last year.Aurora is broke, but it's far enough away that they'd draw well and it'd work for those folks far enough out that don't want the make the trek to the city for games. After living there for a year, it always felt like Chicago's Jersey to me and would be able to support the right team in the right spot, but who knows what that'd be. Not hockey, though. Quote NCFA-FCS/CBB: Minnesota A&M | RANZBA (OOTP): Auckland Warriors | USA: Front Range United | IFA: Toverit Helsinki | FOBL: Kentucky Juggernaut Minnesota A&M 2012 National Champions 2013 National Finalist, 2014 National Semi-finals 2012, 2013, 2014 Big 4 Conference Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Chicago's JerseyNorthwest Indiana Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.