PhysicalGraffiti Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeFrank Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 57 minutes ago, FightingGoldenDevil said: Bring back the pinstripes and m hat Agreed. These guys are the best concepts: washington football (2017) ... nfl (2013) ... yikes potd 10/20/12 origin story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoknight Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 Every NCAAF title claimed by Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Penn State, Notre Dame, USC, Michigan or Alabama. ? 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 10 hours ago, NicDB said: Every tweak the Packers have made since their Super Bowl I look has been a downgrade. I’ll add to that - every tweak they’ve made to their Super Bowl II look has been a downgrade as well. They got it so right at the beginning and have been chipping away at perfection ever since. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderman92 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 I’d have to go with the Florida Marlins teal and black set. The pinstripes are classy and the Marlin ‘F’ looks amazing. Please Jeter go back to these full time and do away with the hideous neon orange and blue colors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderman92 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 2 hours ago, Gothamite said: I’ll add to that - every tweak they’ve made to their Super Bowl II look has been a downgrade as well. They got it so right at the beginning and have been chipping away at perfection ever since. Aren’t they basically the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashcarson15 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 12 hours ago, Ark said: 2015-16 Cavaliers Nah, the Cavs' best set was their first one: If the 2010-18 Cavs set would've had side panels on the shorts like the 1970-74 jerseys they were loosely based off of did, it would've been the best in franchise history -- but the plain shorts really irked me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitedawg22 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 18 hours ago, Bill81361 said: I know this may not be popular, but they did win 3 Super Bowls in this uniform, and at least for sentimental reasons, it's my favorite. I think this basic design was much improved by darkening both the burgundy and gold. The color balance is much better. oh ,my god ,i strong recommend you to have a visit on the website ,or if i'm the president ,i would have an barceque with the anthor of the articel . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 3 hours ago, Gothamite said: I’ll add to that - every tweak they’ve made to their Super Bowl II look has been a downgrade as well. They got it so right at the beginning and have been chipping away at perfection ever since. 1 hour ago, Spiderman92 said: Aren’t they basically the same? Basically. But lots of details were changed, and small details can still make a significant downgrade. Basic rule of design - you don't put white stripes next to gold stripes. It's a muddy mess. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderman92 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 28 minutes ago, Gothamite said: Basically. But lots of details were changed, and small details can still make a significant downgrade. Basic rule of design - you don't put white stripes next to gold stripes. It's a muddy mess. But the sleeves and socks on these did just that. The pattern is yellow-thin green-white-thin green-yellow repeat. Their current uniforms have a green stripe in between the yellow and white you can’t just slap these jerseys on a modern Nike template it wouldn’t work most players wear short sleeves so the quad-stripes would be cut off for 90 percent of players even more so if you move the numbers back to the side. It’s meant to mimick their helmet stripe. Their current set also keeps the consistency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VandyDelphia Mike Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Spiderman92 said: But the sleeves and socks on these did just that. The pattern is yellow-thin green-white-thin green-yellow repeat. Their current uniforms have a green stripe in between the yellow and white you can’t just slap these jerseys on a modern Nike template it wouldn’t work most players wear short sleeves so the quad-stripes would be cut off for 90 percent of players even more so if you move the numbers back to the side. It’s meant to mimick their helmet stripe. Their current set also keeps the consistency Maybe you could get that striping to work if you put it on the base layer. Such as with this BC throwback. Meant to mimic this ... Though more players went without the base layer stripes, than with. NCAA Baseball Champions | 2014, 2019 facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Rich Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 Saints did not win a championship in their "best ever" uniform set, which was their inaugural / early one: But at least they won the Super Bowl with this: and not this or this: It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderman92 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, VandyDelphia Mike said: Maybe you could get that striping to work if you put it on the base layer. Such as with this BC throwback. Meant to mimic this ... Though more players went without the base layer stripes, than with. Yeah I’m not sure about that. Not everyone wears the long sleeve under shirts plus it’ll look kind of silly on players with long sleeves (Aaron Rodgers) having the sleeve number overlap the stripping imo. Plus the nfl probably has rules against undershirt patterns for uniforms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderman92 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, B-Rich said: Saints did not win a championship in their "best ever" uniform set, which was their inaugural / early one: But at least they won the Super Bowl with this: and not this or this: What’s wrong with the bottom ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Point1 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 40 minutes ago, Spiderman92 said: But the sleeves and socks on these did just that. The pattern is yellow-thin green-white-thin green-yellow repeat. Their current uniforms have a green stripe in between the yellow and white you can’t just slap these jerseys on a modern Nike template it wouldn’t work most players wear short sleeves so the quad-stripes would be cut off for 90 percent of players even more so if you move the numbers back to the side. It’s meant to mimick their helmet stripe. Their current set also keeps the consistency Case rested. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Akronite- Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 28 minutes ago, Spiderman92 said: What’s wrong with the bottom ones? Can't speak for others, but I hate stripeless pants. They almost never work IMO. And black stripeless pants are among the worst. Saints in an all-black monochrome look is just plain ugly, whereas white on black removes any sort of identity from a distance and create a very generic looking team. Meanwhile, their gold pants are awesome and underused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderman92 Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 7 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: Case rested. Yeah because they moved the numbers up and made the stripes smaller. Try fitting the numbers and stripes on the side. The Redskins uniforms almost never feature their sleeve stripes because most players sleeves are too short. Regardless the packers haven’t changed at all besides making the facemask green and slightly altering the white to be more consistent so I don’t get the concern Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Akronite- Posted May 7, 2018 Share Posted May 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: So close, but I think we look slightly better with white TV numbers, like Archie and Eddie wore. Was very glad to have won with those sleeve stripes though, and a lot of our modern adjustments (striping size, the Buckeye leaves) have been good. We looked perfect beating Bama in the Sugar Bowl that year. Even small details, like the Block O on the chest rather than the full primary logo, and wearing 7 buckeye leaves on the back neck for our championships, rather than the word "Buckeyes." So good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.