lilben777

College athletics identity changes

Recommended Posts

On 2/13/2021 at 4:42 PM, NicDB said:

 

FCS affiliated, but non-scholarship, which is why you never hear of them. They're a glorified club team.

 

As far as a new nickname, I'd like them to choose somethinh that would enable them to keep their current identity package, as I think it's very well done. I would go with Squires. It means the same basic thing as Knights, but much more unique.

 

I've heard of them. Does no one follow FCS football around here? And what makes them a "glorified club team"? Because they don't have scholarships? This is the kind of attitudes that always frustrate me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks a lot like the logo of one of my Alma Maters, Rowan University. 

1HsozEb.jpg

I like it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/15/2021 at 4:28 PM, CrimsonBull9584 said:

 

I've heard of them. Does no one follow FCS football around here? And what makes them a "glorified club team"? Because they don't have scholarships? This is the kind of attitudes that always frustrate me. 

 

Fine, glorified D-III team that only plays at FCS because of NCAA rules. (and honestly Valpo football is bad even by Pioneer League standards).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/18/2021 at 1:19 PM, JayMac said:

That looks a lot like the logo of one of my Alma Maters, Rowan University. 

1HsozEb.jpgTo09Z9W.png

I like it.

 

They look absolutely nothing like each other. Owl head vs. Full body. 3/4 turn vs. front view. Different fonts. Similar colors though but so what. That's like saying Georgia & Gonzaga bulldog logos look a lot like each other because they use similar shades of red.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Made this discovery today: Harvard has a new athletics shield & wordmark. When did this happen? I dug back through their athletics Twitter and found it first used in June 2020. I haven't seen a single article about it. Pretty crazy for a D1 program. Part of why I never noticed or checked anything of theirs is the fact that Ivy League teams haven't played anything in nearly a year. So anyways, the new shield is slightly thinner and has a white outline. I asked about the curved notches in the serifs and was told they represent Harvard Stadium which is iconic in its own right. I think for more accuracy, just the top 2 serifs should had been notched out as Harvard Stadium is only bowled in at one end & straight at the other. I believe the color has changed from Pantone 187 to 201.
NEW
spacer.png     spacer.png
OLD                                                                           Harvard Stadium
spacer.png     spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Earl said:

They look absolutely nothing like each other. Owl head vs. Full body. 3/4 turn vs. front view. Different fonts. Similar colors though but so what. That's like saying Georgia & Gonzaga bulldog logos look a lot like each other because they use similar shades of red.

I'm definitely not saying it is a rip-off but having an owl in the same seldom-used color combo is at least similar. They just remind me of each other. Having two bulldog logos in red is not uncommon at all. Bad analogy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boston College Announces New Balance As Official Outfitter In All Sports Except Football

April 13, 2021 - 14:31 PM

Boston College announced on Tuesday morning that New Balance will become the new official outfitter of 30 of the Eagles’ 31 varsity athletic programs. That excludes football, which will announce a separate deal in the coming weeks. “This partnership will be an absolute game-changer for Boston College athletics and our

Read More...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting; Nike has their Oregon and UA has their Maryland.

 

Now NB gets their Boston College. Though I tend to think it'll be more "university close to HQ" than "school we get to experiment wackily with." Because football is not included, and because neither New Balance nor the BC Eagles are typically known for pushing the innovation envelope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stumpygremlin said:

I wonder why football isn't included

Probably could command a bit more from another source than with New Balance.  I suspect it'll be either Adidas or Nike for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Webfooter said:

Probably could command a bit more from another source than with New Balance.  I suspect it'll be either Adidas or Nike for them.

https://www.bsnsports.com/vendor_catalogs/new_balance_2020/2020-Spring-Fall-Football-Catalog-single-pages_co.pdf

It looks like they don't have too many options for football either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yuck. New Balance would have literally been a better choice for their football program than this. It's also only for three years, so it doesn't even line up with the New Balance deal.

 

This tweet seems to imply that they're downgrading to the 1962-2000 logo and presumably bringing back the throwbacks full-time. Pretty unfortunate since their last Under Armour set was one of the best looks in the ACC. On the other hand, the promotional graphic for this deal on their website uses the current logo, so... 🤷‍♂️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lights Out said:

Yuck. New Balance would have literally been a better choice for their football program than this. It's also only for three years, so it doesn't even line up with the New Balance deal.

 

This tweet seems to imply that they're downgrading to the 1962-2000 logo and presumably bringing back the throwbacks full-time. Pretty unfortunate since their last Under Armour set was one of the best looks in the ACC. On the other hand, the promotional graphic for this deal on their website uses the current logo, so... 🤷‍♂️

South Florida Slime Uniform — UNISWAG

At least they'll be getting this cut and not the tire treads. . . Hopefully. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lights Out said:

Yuck. New Balance would have literally been a better choice for their football program than this. It's also only for three years, so it doesn't even line up with the New Balance deal.

 

This tweet seems to imply that they're downgrading to the 1962-2000 logo and presumably bringing back the throwbacks full-time. Pretty unfortunate since their last Under Armour set was one of the best looks in the ACC. On the other hand, the promotional graphic for this deal on their website uses the current logo, so... 🤷‍♂️

 

Strong disagree...the modern BC set, especially with the white pants and contrasting sleeve caps with stripes, was pretty horrid. The 80s set and the 90s Glenn Foley set were far more aesthetically pleasing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.