nogologo Posted July 28, 2018 Share Posted July 28, 2018 Press Release with full visual identity Quote All of the design work was done in-house. Old Logo New Logo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted July 28, 2018 Share Posted July 28, 2018 Looks like BC, and the Philadelphia Eagles logos had a baby. The stand alone head logo needs some work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1991 Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 here is nixa (mo) high school eagles logo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appleclock Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 I like the old one better. It had a unique style to it. It’s like they wanted a modern logo but weren’t willing to pay someone to do it, so they got someone to cobble together a logo from various eagle parts from various other eagle logos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 I don't get this one at all. 1 the back wing (in navy blue) almost looks like it's on top of the body, rather than behind. Either way you look at it, it's really poorly designed. 2. The white highlignts on the light-blue wing (and elsewhere on the logo) are too slight, and look like afterthoughts. 3. The feet look like they were just pasted on after it was done, like the designer was about to present it to the client and was like "oh crap", so just added the feet at the end. 4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body. Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Bannister Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 2 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said: I don't get this one at all. 1 the back wing (in navy blue) almost looks like it's on top of the body, rather than behind. Either way you look at it, it's really poorly designed. 2. The white highlignts on the light-blue wing (and elsewhere on the logo) are too slight, and look like afterthoughts. 3. The feet look like they were just pasted on after it was done, like the designer was about to present it to the client and was like "oh crap", so just added the feet at the end. 4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body. Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works. it looks like a blue flame is on top of his head, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WavePunter Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 3 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said: I don't get this one at all. 1 the back wing (in navy blue) almost looks like it's on top of the body, rather than behind. Either way you look at it, it's really poorly designed. 2. The white highlignts on the light-blue wing (and elsewhere on the logo) are too slight, and look like afterthoughts. 3. The feet look like they were just pasted on after it was done, like the designer was about to present it to the client and was like "oh crap", so just added the feet at the end. 4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body. Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works. I think you just described, in great and accurate detail, the entirety of the design process that went into this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 4 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said: 4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body. Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works. Yeah, that's a design trend that didn't need to come back. MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardsblues02 Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 1 hour ago, SFGiants58 said: Yeah, that's a design trend that didn't need to come back. Cincy had one of these too, and they even had it at midfield. While I really like that particular logo (might be my favorite Bengals logo), these ones are really bad. That Broncos logo actually makes me sick. This is poorly designed, and thats about all there is to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burkell007 Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 So nobody this this is a upgrade alone based off of it don’t look like Marquette’s old logo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sc49erfan15 Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 On 7/28/2018 at 6:20 PM, nogologo said: Looks like something that would've been posted in the Concepts forum in 2006. It's not bad (nor is it particularly good) but it looks dated already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Scorcho Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 It is bad. It looks like a first draft made by someone who is having their first go with the pen tool. Then the way it sits on the body is way, way off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.