nogologo

Roger Williams University - New Logo

Recommended Posts

I like the old one better. It had a unique style to it. It’s like they wanted a modern logo but weren’t willing to pay someone to do it, so they got someone to cobble together a logo from various eagle parts from various other eagle logos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Full_hawk.jpg

  

I don't get this one at all.

 

1 the back wing (in navy blue) almost looks like it's on top of the body, rather than behind.  Either way you look at it, it's really poorly designed.

2. The white highlignts on the light-blue wing (and elsewhere on the logo) are too slight, and look like afterthoughts.

3. The feet look like they were just pasted on after it was done, like the designer was about to present it to the client and was like "oh crap", so just added the feet at the end.

4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body.  Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said:

Full_hawk.jpg

  

I don't get this one at all.

 

1 the back wing (in navy blue) almost looks like it's on top of the body, rather than behind.  Either way you look at it, it's really poorly designed.

2. The white highlignts on the light-blue wing (and elsewhere on the logo) are too slight, and look like afterthoughts.

3. The feet look like they were just pasted on after it was done, like the designer was about to present it to the client and was like "oh crap", so just added the feet at the end.

4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body.  Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works.

it looks like a blue flame is on top of his head, lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said:

Full_hawk.jpg

  

I don't get this one at all.

 

1 the back wing (in navy blue) almost looks like it's on top of the body, rather than behind.  Either way you look at it, it's really poorly designed.

2. The white highlignts on the light-blue wing (and elsewhere on the logo) are too slight, and look like afterthoughts.

3. The feet look like they were just pasted on after it was done, like the designer was about to present it to the client and was like "oh crap", so just added the feet at the end.

4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body.  Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works.

I think you just described, in great and accurate detail, the entirety of the design process that went into this... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said:

4. It looks like the head was designed first, and then forced onto the body.  Let's not even discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the head, but designing like that never works.

 

Yeah, that's a design trend that didn't need to come back.

 

342.gif343.gif596.gif598.gif452.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SFGiants58 said:

 

Yeah, that's a design trend that didn't need to come back.

 

342.gif343.gif596.gif598.gif452.gif

Cincy had one of these too, and they even had it at midfield. While I really like that particular logo (might be my favorite Bengals logo), these ones are really bad. That Broncos logo actually makes me sick.

 

This is poorly designed, and thats about all there is to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So nobody this this is a upgrade alone based off of it don’t look like Marquette’s old logo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/28/2018 at 6:20 PM, nogologo said:

Full_hawk.jpg

Hawks_Head.jpg

 

Looks like something that would've been posted in the Concepts forum in 2006.

 

It's not bad (nor is it particularly good) but it looks dated already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is bad.

 

It looks like a first draft made by someone who is having their first go with the pen tool.

 

Then the way it sits on the body is way, way off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.