MCM0313 Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 1 hour ago, BellaSpurs said: Bah! Humbug. That's a downgrade. Give me the bright colors! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chcarlson23 Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 "And those who know Your Name put their trust in You, for You, O Lord, have not forsaken those who seek You." Psalms 9:10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 On 11/19/2018 at 10:58 AM, tigerslionspistonshabs said: Why the team doesn't use this is absolutely mind boggling. You wouldn’t believe me if I told you. On 11/19/2018 at 6:35 PM, KRZYBDGRZ said: As Derek said (and I think I’m remembering this right), that logo was done in house at OSU, and it was out for roughly one day before Rickabaugh (designer of the original?) said something to the effect of, “What are you doing? Give me a couple hours and we can fix this.” The current logo was out within the week. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_DietDrPepper_ Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 4 hours ago, MCM0313 said: Bah! Humbug. That's a downgrade. Give me the bright colors! Ignoring the colors, the typeface and spur logo are both big ups Follow the NFA, and My Baseball League here: https://ahsports.boardhost.com/index.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaz Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, BellaSpurs said: Ignoring the colors, the typeface and spur logo are both big ups It's a downgrade from this though Not that think any of them are actually good primary logos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand Cesarano Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 19 minutes ago, BrandMooreArt said: A major downgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 Ignoring the black outline phase in between: The same idea/profile, but with simple detailing and fewer jagged points. Also, the Orioles combining a long history of cartoon bird logos into one: MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 24 minutes ago, Ferdinand Cesarano said: A major downgrade. The uniforms were more of a downgrade than the logo was. Even so, I too prefer the OG falcon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 50 minutes ago, Ferdinand Cesarano said: A major downgrade. quit trollin' ! GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 45 minutes ago, Morgo said: Also a downgrade. The extra black outline muddies the B and makes it so much less legible at distance or smaller size. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 23 minutes ago, BrandMooreArt said: quit trollin' ! Sorry Bmoore, but I'm with him... You and I see eye to eye on a lot of things, but not on the Falcon's identity. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinsUp1214 Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 The old falcon did need updating, yes, but the resulting angry bird with the jacked-up swollen foot and the squat wings wasn’t the answer. They could’ve done much better with the modernization than that. I cant find a good picture that looks a lot like the logo’s intended form, but these three come a little close at least with the wings and head: What the original’s got on the current to me is a more correct proportion regarding the wings. They were longer and the falcon seems larger and more imposing. The current’s wings just look too small and diminutive and don’t seem “correct”. Throw in that inexcusably huge foot and the whole thing’s got a proportion problem. They were so concerned with making it look fast and speedy and angry that they neglected to make it look right. Now, to each thier own, but I really do think they could’ve updated the Falcon and done a much better job than they did. That’s just how I see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 16 minutes ago, Gothamite said: Also a downgrade. On what planet . The Bruins 1996 logo was terrible. Quote The extra black outline muddies the B and makes it so much less legible at distance or smaller size. The extra black outline makes the "B" more prominent which is exactly what the logo needed. What looks muddled to me is how thin the outline on the previous logo was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 22 minutes ago, Gothamite said: Also a downgrade. The extra black outline muddies the B and makes it so much less legible at distance or smaller size. That is in turn a downgrade from this: So much simpler and easy to read. MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTConcepts Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 to "You ain't gonna learn what you don't wanna know..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Zeus89725 said: to A thousand times yes. The Florida Panthers' pre-soccer logos were awesome. I like the overly detailed first one even better. EDIT: For some reason I thought we were talking about downgrades. I consider the above a definite downgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 Both of the Falcons' logos are greatly flawed. The old one looks like silhouetted clip art that you would see on Microsoft Office, and the current one is over-designed with too many elements and outlines. While the old logo is a more accurate image of a falcon, the current one is more up-to-date IMO so I consider it a refresh. 15 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said: That is in turn a downgrade from this: So much simpler and easy to read. The gold lines get lost from a distance; they need black around them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 29 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said: That is in turn a downgrade from this: So much simpler and easy to read. Yep. Better than both of them. The “B” doesn’t get lost in the noise the way it does on the modern logo. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.