simtek34 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, ARTnSocal said: I'm really glad the Bills re-did their unforms with Reebok and right before Nike took over in 2012 because with the exception of Minnesota's there's no other makeover I have liked, and even with the Vikings they didn't make them proper white striped socks to go with their purple pants. Tell me about it. The Vikings haven’t worn White socks since 1964. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lbj273 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 14 minutes ago, ARTnSocal said: I'm really glad the Bills re-did their unforms with Reebok and right before Nike took over in 2012 because with the exception of Minnesota's there's no other makeover I have liked, and even with the Vikings they didn't make them proper white striped socks to go with their purple pants. Or they could have skipped the god awful purple pants completely. The purple pants and black facemask are the two biggest problems with the Vikings uniforms imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 1 hour ago, DNAsports said: If the leaked uniforms had traditional stripes, I’d almost guarantee 90% of the people on here who don’t like them, would love them. Seriously, the only non-traditional thing about these uniforms are the stripes. Everything else is perfect. I like the stripes, just because they're the only jetlike thing about the set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j'villejags Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 A good look inside Gotham Hall as they prep for tonight. Love the venue they chose for this. My NFL concept series (in progress) --ATL, CLE, NE, WAS done. AZ updated 04/21/23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Just now, lbj273 said: Or they could have skipped the god awful purple pants completely. The purple pants and black facemask are the two biggest problems with the Vikings uniforms imo. Black facemask sucks - either purple or white would've been better - but I don't mind the purple pants so much, as long as they're worn alongside the white jersey. It would be cool if they had striped socks though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 2 hours ago, Gr3g3 said: Would be such a huge waste of time... It’s quite funny to see this in a thread containing six months of speculation about a couple outfits. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTnSocal Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 31 minutes ago, simtek34 said: Tell me about it. The Vikings haven’t worn white socks since 1964 Like so . . 04-OCT-1964 Lambeau Field / Green Bay, Wisconsin Vikings at Packers Minnesota 24 - Green Bay 23 and the sock striping nearly matched the jersey striping, not bad for 1964 . . Even back then they knew that if you had pants of color you needed white socks, not the socks of the same color. The current leotard look that so many teams have is just so awful!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, ARTnSocal said: Like so . . 04-OCT-1964 Lambeau Field / Green Bay, Wisconsin Vikings at Packers Minnesota 24 - Green Bay 23 and the sock striping nearly matched the jersey striping, not bad for 1964 . . Actually it did match the sleeve exactly, it's just cut off by Tarkenton's ankle tape job. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTnSocal Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 12 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: Actually it did match the sleeve exactly, it's just cut off by Tarkenton's ankle tape job. No . . I did catch that part, that wasn't what I was referring to. Take notice that the upper and lower striping on the socks appear to look thicker than the ones on the jersey. That's what I had meant. BTW . . I like those current purple pants, it's just that those purple socks ruin the look. The Bills have that same problem with the current socks worn with the royal blue pants. We should take notice of the white striped socks that were worn with the blue pants from 1975-1980 before switching to the red socks in 1981 which I wasn't a fan of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WavePunter Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: Actually it did match the sleeve exactly, it's just cut off by Tarkenton's ankle tape job. Very close, but proportions were off slightly.. still very good for 1964 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primzahl Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 lol people on here really thought the leak was a smoke screen.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primzahl Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFallenHaveRisen Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 Only thing I don't really like is the number font, was really hoping they'd go with that USAF Armadillo font, also the name & stripes need a black outline to match the number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KittSmith_95 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, Primzahl said: Is this a mock up? Another leak? My question here: Why the black outline on the numbers, but not the sleeve stripe or "New York" across the front? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFallenHaveRisen Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, KittSmith_95 said: Is this a mock up? Another leak? My question here: Why the black outline on the numbers, but not the sleeve stripe or "New York" across the front? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 1 hour ago, BJ Sands said: I'm so excited for this. Not because I'm expecting any surprises or anything, but it's just exciting when a team unveils a new uniform set. And you just can't hide it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, KittSmith_95 said: Is this a mock up? Another leak? My question here: Why the black outline on the numbers, but not the sleeve stripe or "New York" across the front? Like the Bills. Why the Black outline? Not on the Jets logo on the helmet either. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentColon2 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 After seeing that NEW YORK over JETS logo I feel anything is an upgrade. Maybe that’s why I’m not hating on this so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 The Saskatchewan RoughJets of New York. Don’t @ me PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 I actually really like this. It’s a solid update to the 90s set while still incorporating some elements of the traditional Jets look. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.