Jump to content

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LMU said:

I would bet that this would have been the ultimate outcome if Fisher would have been replaced by 90% of similar rich guys. 

 

I would bet that 90% of similar rich guys would take the more than one billion dollars of profit by selling the team, and would then be perfectly happy with an expansion team.

logo-diamonds-for-CC-no-photo-sig.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh. Well, that may be the final nail in the coffin for my baseball fandom. Baseball has made a LOT of choices over the last decade that I fully disagree with, and now they’ve ripped my first ever favorite sports team out of the Bay Area to move them to my least favorite city of all time. Combine that with my mom dying a few years ago (who was the driving force for why I even liked baseball so much), and I think my enthusiasm is just fully snuffed out at this point. 
 

 

Also, two things I want to point out based on posts above: 

 

The Giants are catching a LOT of the blame for “running the A’s out of town”, but that’s nonsense. The A’s made some amazingly poor decisions over the last four decades, and they basically asked the Giants to bail them out (they paid for the South Bay territory and want to be fairly compensated for that, which the cheap ass A’s said no to). That’s an absurd ask, and it’s INFURIATING that people are buying the lie. 
 

 

Removing the anti trust exemption from baseball would be a good thing, but the reason they have it is because baseball as an organization predates anti trust laws. I’m not sure there’s a way to really square that issue. 

  • Like 2

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GhostOfNormMacdonald said:

  The biggest takeaway from the Law in Sports class I had to take in undergrad is that we need to remove the anti-trust exemption from baseball and pro-sports in general.

You need the antitrust exemption in order for the major leagues to exist. We just need to enforce it.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2024 at 11:36 AM, The_Admiral said:

The team has been headquartered in Ashburn for years, though. They've put down some roots there, a Virginia stadium has been the white whale of the team and the state for years, and if new ownership asks for minimal help in making it happen, they probably could. Sizable difference between an NFL stadium in America's ghastliest suburban sprawl and trying to shoehorn an arena into Alexandria by shuttle-busing people in from the airport lot.

 

Anyway, back to America's sweethearts, the White Sox, who put down an actual field at Roosevelt/Clark to prove they can at least afford that part:

 

the-78-1.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

 

They invited lawmakers to play catch on the field and then they didn't go.

 

But look! You can see b u i l d i n g s! Look, there's that one! And then the other one!


"But where are the cranes?"
- Kevin Warren

Quote
"You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke."

twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that anti-trust can't apply to MLB because it predates anti-trust is absurd and has no basis in reality. The main reason it still applies is that in the 1922 case, Federal Baseball Club vs National League, SCOTUS ruled that sports can't be considered interstate commerce and so the Federal government can't apply anti trust laws to it. The justices that ruled in that case had no idea how big of an industry baseball would get, nor were they of an era that saw it as anything more than entertainment.  the ruling is fundamentally flawed and is nonsensical in the 21st century.

Using a ruling made in 1922 by judges with a 19th century view of both what interstate commerce means and what sports are is not a tenable situation. The idea that professional sports isn't interstate commerce in this day and age is wrong and only benefits the über wealthy.

:censored: John Fischer. :censored: the Pohlads. :censored: the cartel of soulless, faceless businessmen that have taken sport, one of the most human things, and squeezed every last penny out of it.

Our politicians are goddamned cowards for letting this keep happening

  • Like 1
  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2024 at 11:36 AM, The_Admiral said:

The team has been headquartered in Ashburn for years, though. They've put down some roots there, a Virginia stadium has been the white whale of the team and the state for years, and if new ownership asks for minimal help in making it happen, they probably could. Sizable difference between an NFL stadium in America's ghastliest suburban sprawl and trying to shoehorn an arena into Alexandria by shuttle-busing people in from the airport lot.

 

Anyway, back to America's sweethearts, the White Sox, who put down an actual field at Roosevelt/Clark to prove they can at least afford that part:

 

the-78-1.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

 

They invited lawmakers to play catch on the field and then they didn't go.

 

But look! You can see b u i l d i n g s! Look, there's that one! And then the other one!

 

"Did they pray for this to happen?"- Kevin Warren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, VampyrRabbit said:

Brodie Brazil did a video on it and pointed out that Maricopa County is trying to push for a 50 year lease, which is absolutely unheard of as the maximum that these leases go for is typically 30 years.  That and the lease doesn't have the renovations and upgrades factored in so it on its face doesn't seem appealing for the team to be locked in for half a century while volunteering to still assume all the upkeep.

VmWIn6B.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The diamondbacks aren't leaving Arizona anytime soon IMO. This is just what negotiations look like, where you start out with a big ask and then whittle it down.

 

I am not defending the "public pays for stadiums" thing, but Chase Field's roof no longer works the way it originally did. They cannot move it during games anymore because it's too dangerous to open with people inside. So, they aren't just complaining about it being not-fancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now for the non-emotional reaction to Oakland.

 

John Fisher is a liar and his mismanaged every step of this move.

 

However, both that can be true and the fact that Oakland has always been a troubled spot for Major League Baseball. This was probably an inevitability. An A's move within the bay had the cards stacked against it (because of NIMBYs), and the idea of just tearing down the Coliseum and rebuilding there probably only would have happened with a sentimental owner like Peter Seidler.

 

The Oakland fans who are mad about San Jose are kind of funny though. You can go to their SBnation website from back then and its full of comments about how they'll never root for the team again if they sell out to silicon valley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.