Jump to content

2020-2021 NHL Changes


squamfan

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, AFirestormToPurify said:

Navy puck? Nah. Black is fine

spacer.png

Eh, dunno. It's barely different from a visual standpoint. Sure, a puck isn't navy blue, but maple leaves aren't blue, either. A northman isn't an stylized igloo with a hockey stick. Dolphins aren't bright teal, and I can't remember seeing a jaguar with a teal nose, eyes and tongue. Logos shouldn't need to be strictly literal about how things are detailed, as long as it looks good.

 

Hell, the Caps logo has a red hockey puck, which is far more egregiously "wrong" than a navy blue one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wackyriderfan14 said:

What I would like to see

Promote the Reverse Retros to the Roads

Bring back the Royals as Homes

Have an Orange Alt

100% bring back royal but I feel like the retro reverse would be too much orange to with the home. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Wackyriderfan14 said:

What I would like to see

Promote the Reverse Retros to the Roads

Bring back the Royals as Homes

Have an Orange Alt

Hot take warning: The Oilers need to completely change their logos and colors. If not for the 80s dynasty and Gretzky, we'd be seeing their logo and colors for what they are, an extremely dated product of the 70s that has aged horribly. I think going with navy is a step in the right direction at least. We need to take off the nostalgia goggles, going retro sometimes work when the team got it right the first time but imo, the Oilers don't apply. They were onto something in the 90s with the oil worker shoulder patch and copper as a secondary color, not quite it, but it was something. The McFarlane thirds were also onto something, that logo was better than the dated roundel with the disco font and silver and navy is a good color combo that's not used much in the NHL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ridleylash said:

 

Eh, dunno. It's barely different from a visual standpoint. Sure, a puck isn't navy blue, but maple leaves aren't blue, either. A northman isn't an stylized igloo with a hockey stick. Dolphins aren't bright teal, and I can't remember seeing a jaguar with a teal nose, eyes and tongue. Logos shouldn't need to be strictly literal about how things are detailed, as long as it looks good.

 

Hell, the Caps logo has a red hockey puck, which is far more egregiously "wrong" than a navy blue one.

I get what you're saying, and I agree with most of those examples except you can tell the blue leaf is still a leaf, the jaguar with a teal tongue still looks like a jaguar etc. The puck in navy blue doesn't look like a puck anymore, just looks like a weird blue stump. Again, the black is fine. Changing it to the next closest color (well, other than charcoal of course) seems like a lateral move at best, you said it yourself, it's barely noticeable, so why change it? BFBS in reverse lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, only two games for the Coyotes red jersey, and both are on the road on back-to-back days. They're wearing them in Minnesota, so I'm guessing the Wild will go with their reverse retros those days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, spartacat_12 said:

Wow, only two games for the Coyotes red jersey, and both are on the road on back-to-back days. They're wearing them in Minnesota, so I'm guessing the Wild will go with their reverse retros those days. 

I think everyone kinda knew this was coming among the fanbase; I'd be stunned if this isn't indicative of the team's direction in regards to branding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2020 at 4:45 PM, mcj882000 said:

Hey, you know what would have been a great compromise: if every team just sold their helmet ad-space to charities and relief programs for the year

I'm sure those groups could use the extra eyeballs to get funding and supplies during these uncertain times, and there's a lot you can get away with if it's for charity, after all - the Utah Jazz realised this in 2017, and they didn't even need the excuse of a pandemic either

 

3 hours ago, LMU said:

The Kings have a helmet sponsor.
 

 

oh hey, look, at least one team's doing this the right way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

40 minutes ago, Ridleylash said:

I think everyone kinda knew this was coming among the fanbase; I'd be stunned if this isn't indicative of the team's direction in regards to branding.

That’s too bad. I know it’s somehow an unpopular opinion, but I really like that sweater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.