Pa02 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 With such a :censored: history, they should never went back to being the browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, Newport said: With such a history, they should never went back to being the browns. I've fought this fight before. Back down while you can. MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 22 minutes ago, Newport said: With such a history, they should never went back to being the browns. Yeah. 7 Championships in 10 years is awful and deserves to be forgotten. It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksFan5 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 The argument of "lol browns bad" as an excuse for them to change their identity has always been stupid to me considering the Browns are one of the most storied franchises in all of football. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pa02 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, Newport said: Garbage What's this in response to? PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 2 hours ago, colortv said: Why? Because I just don't think teams need three pants and the number of combinations that 3 pants gives them. Have a look. Maybe have an alternate look. But if you have three pants and three jerseys, that gives you (I'm not good at math, so check me here) 9 combos? Maybe even more if we factor in socks. That's just ridiculously unnecessary. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colortv Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 4 minutes ago, BringBackTheVet said: Because I just don't think teams need three pants and the number of combinations that 3 pants gives them. Have a look. Maybe have an alternate look. But if you have three pants and three jerseys, that gives you (I'm not good at math, so check me here) 9 combos? Maybe even more if we factor in socks. That's just ridiculously unnecessary. Again, why? If it's part of the team's main color scheme I don't see the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scraw28 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scraw28 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 33 minutes ago, colortv said: Again, why? If it's part of the team's main color scheme I don't see the problem. Because if you have a best look, you should always wear it. If you have three pants options, you don't always look your best. It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Diablo Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Get rid of that crap brown facemask and you're on the right track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 35 minutes ago, colortv said: Again, why? If it's part of the team's main color scheme I don't see the problem. Because the NFL just plays a 16 game schedule (for now). 3 jerseys and 3 pants mean 6 home combos and 3 road combos. There's no point. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 17 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: Because the NFL just plays a 16 game schedule (for now). 3 jerseys and 3 pants mean 6 home combos and 3 road combos. There's no point. There needs to be one exception to this rule. 3 Jerseys and 3 pants works if the 3rd jersey and 3rd pant are only worn together like a throwback or special color rush. One extra rule I would like to add to this is that the 3rd pair of pants can't be the same color as one of the first two pairs unless it is part of a throwback. I am looking at you Dallas and Tampa Bay. The New York Giants used to break this rule with two different pairs of grey pants but i believe they only wear one pair now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 27 minutes ago, dmhtfld said: There needs to be one exception to this rule. 3 Jerseys and 3 pants works if the 3rd jersey and 3rd pant are only worn together like a throwback or special color rush. One extra rule I would like to add to this is that the 3rd pair of pants can't be the same color as one of the first two pairs unless it is part of a throwback. I am looking at you Dallas and Tampa Bay. The New York Giants used to break this rule with two different pairs of grey pants but i believe they only wear one pair now. Nope. There doesn't need to be an exception. No one needs 3 jerseys and 3 pants. It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugevolsfan Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 1 hour ago, colortv said: Again, why? If it's part of the team's main color scheme I don't see the problem. Because when you have a good look you should wear it most of the time. My Fictional Football League Version 3 My Fictional Football Leagues WebsiteMy Church Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 1 hour ago, colortv said: Again, why? If it's part of the team's main color scheme I don't see the problem. Because if you have 9 looks, then you don't have a look. If you look at the most successful brands, they have one thing in common - consistency. Predictability. You know who the team is just by looking at them, without having to process anything. I'm not against alts - I think they can expand the brand - but when we start getting into 7 8, 9 combos - that's just too much. I can't see needing more than three shirts and two pants. Again - like with everything, it's not a hard line rule, and there can be one-off exceptions - but for the most part, if you feel you need that many combos to represent your brand, then you don't really have a strong brand to begin with. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chakfu Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 I guess I prefer 3 pants so there's no risk they'll only have white and brown with 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meshmaster101 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 On 4/9/2020 at 9:41 AM, VDizzle12 said: Brown facemask stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayMac Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 11 hours ago, BringBackTheVet said: Because I just don't think teams need three pants and the number of combinations that 3 pants gives them. Have a look. Maybe have an alternate look. But if you have three pants and three jerseys, that gives you (I'm not good at math, so check me here) 9 combos? Maybe even more if we factor in socks. That's just ridiculously unnecessary. Agreed. I think it allows for a lot of error. For example, as you mentioned, the O/O/O for the Browns would be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.