Jump to content

Patriots Unveil New Uniforms


Wentz2Jeffery

Recommended Posts

It's not always so striking, that's the thing. Every now and then some architect is able to get away with plopping a Death Star into London, Paris, or Boston, and even if it's objectively ugly, there's enough money in it and scope to it that you can concede that it demands your attention. But that's not all brutalism. Everyday brutalism is just every library or comp-sci hall at a state university, or suburban office buildings with tenants whose purposes you can't immediately figure out.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, the admiral said:

It's not always so striking, that's the thing. Every now and then some architect is able to get away with plopping a Death Star into London, Paris, or Boston, and even if it's objectively ugly, there's enough money in it and scope to it that you can concede that it demands your attention. But that's not all brutalism. Most of it is just every library or comp-sci hall at a state university.

 

True that!

 

Like, I went to Marquette for my History MA. That campus is a total mix of brutalism and classy brick edifices. 

 

campus.jpg?w=960%26h=370%26crop=1&f=1&nofb=1 th?id=OIP.Ao7gnAnahQDkUbcsiyAO2wHaFL%26p tumblr_m98wphdRfO1r21vxto1_500.jpg

 

I'm still mildly disappointed they tore down McCormick Hall. That place was a special kind of ugly.

 

mccormick-hall.jpg

 

I saw renderings in the archives that looked pretty cool. It's a shame it turned out like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all brutalist architecture is done right, but when it is done right it is striking and gives off a different vibe from other architectural styles.

 

Interesting that you mentioned the Death Star, because that honestly could be considered an example of brutalist architecture. And it was designed to be striking and intimidating. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Pats' redesign has resulted in a discussion of the merits and failings of brutalist architecture, and the delayed Rams uniform unveil has erupted into a heated debate over the feasibility and long term prospects of the Chargers and Bills playing in their respective current cities.

The quarantine works in mysterious ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said:

I don't think they were around long enough to be considered iconic in the NFL. In NO ORDER, other than how they popped into my head: Bears, Packers, Colts, Chiefs, Raiders, Giants.
 

 

I think your list has all of the right teams on it. But, I'd also add the following:

 

Cowboys

49ers

Redskins

Steelers

Browns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ark said:

Not all brutalist architecture is done right, but when it is done right it is striking and gives off a different vibe from other architectural styles.

 

Interesting that you mentioned the Death Star, because that honestly could be considered an example of brutalist architecture. And it was designed to be striking and intimidating. 

 

What would be the conceptual reason behind making a building intimidating?  I mean, you certainly can, but what's the mindset? The Wayne County jail in Detroit is an example, but what's the point?  It's already a friggin' jail, isn't that enough? What's the purpose behind making it also look and feel like a sci-fi concentration camp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see the iconic teams as, in no order:

 

Steelers

Colts

Raiders

Cowboys

Giants

Packers

Bears

49ers

 

Teams like the Browns, Redskins, Chiefs, and Rams are right on the brink. 50 years from now, you could argue Patriots, but not yet.

fiowXOD.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Giants won multiple Superbowls in different uniform designs from different eras. Somehow, that brings down the timelessness of either look, in my mind.   

I'm not sure that makes sense to anyone else, but that's how my brain works. If all the images you saw from their important moments were in the same basic (modified for changes due to materials and such) uniform I'd think of it differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said:

I don't think they were around long enough to be considered iconic in the NFL. In NO ORDER, other than how they popped into my head: Bears, Packers, Colts, Chiefs, Raiders, Giants.

 

2 hours ago, GrimlockAutobot said:

 

I think your list has all of the right teams on it. But, I'd also add the following:

 

Cowboys

49ers

Redskins

Steelers

Browns

 

IMHO The following teams *should have* been on the above list but, in the last 20+ years or so, they fubar'ed their own beautiful and iconic brand identities:

 

Eagles

Rams

Seahawks ( I do like Seattle's current set)

Dolphins

Patriots

Broncos

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ark said:

Sports examples of brutalist architecture at its best:

 

byx0gUg.jpg

 

vMl8Gzb.jpg

 

These buildings stand out. They give off a vibe all their own. 

 

 

 

Yes, the same vibe I get from this song, written by a man trying to get over his breakup.

 

 

They really do make you feel like your "Down in a Hole," a hole that's a massive white elephant that nearly led teams to move and were just so depressing as stadiums. Like, this is my favorite demolition .gif for a reason:

 

kingdome.gif?fit=crop&w=625&q=60&auto=fo

 

So satisfying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GrimlockAutobot said:

 

I think your list has all of the right teams on it. But, I'd also add the following:

 

Cowboys

49ers

Redskins

Steelers

Browns

Which Redskins uniform? Burgundy over gold? Burgundy over white? White over burgundy? White over gold? All white? All burgundy? Throwback to 1994? They have too many combos to call one of them iconic, IMO.

Italic number Steelers takes away from the iconic status, again, in my mind. That strikes me as a significant change (moreso than the logo on the front). 

 

Cowboys - yeah, probably belong on the list, but yuck to the mismatched colors.

It's where I sit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brutalism has its good and its bad applications, like any other type of architecture or era of sports uniform. The projects of Le Corbusier, for example, are visually interesting and striking and not-prison-like at all. Unfortunately he only built one building in the States, but it's across the river from Boston's City Hall, at Harvard.

 

02-ccva-980.jpg

 

I think Boston's current City Hall isn't great but also isn't as bad as people think. The problem is that it's placed on an urban renewal block, surrounded by a truly awful expansive brick plaza, surrounded by other government buildings in a similar style ... it feels like the entire block was a spite fence. That this happened across the street from Haymarket and Quincy Market and other classic Old Boston things was really a bad idea.

 

Boston's Old City Hall was much more attractive and apropos for the city, though it's also very "Philadelphia but worse", as is the case with most of Boston's culture. Last I knew it had been converted to a couple offices and a Ruth's Chris Steak House, which is insulting.

 

old-city-hall.jpg

Showcasing fan-made sports apparel by artists and designers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, dont care said:

I think the last uniform is iconic just because of the success that happened in them. People will think of those 6 championships and instantly picture those uniforms. That’s what I feel makes them iconic.

 

I think iconic-ness is a function of both success and time. It's hard to directly compare, right now, because the Patriots are at a disadvantage on that scale being probably the first dynasty purely borne of the 21st century. In the Big Four leagues there's not a contemporary comparison, I don't think -- maybe the NBA can put forward one of the Spurs, Lakers or Warriors, but each of those teams had looks indebted to past teams much more than the relative freshness of the Patriots.

 

It's hard to say for sure if that look has achieved icon status, but we do know that we'll be seeing it an awful lot in the Hall of Fame exhibits. Will people wear Brady throwbacks 12 years from now for fashion reasons? Wouldn't be surprised! 

Showcasing fan-made sports apparel by artists and designers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ark said:

Sports examples of brutalist architecture at its best:

 

byx0gUg.jpg

 

 

The Kingdome was hideous. The mountains and the water make it look ok. But if you put the Kingdome in Kansas or Oklahoma or something it would be a huge eyesore. 

Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said:

Which Redskins uniform? Burgundy over gold? Burgundy over white? White over burgundy? White over gold? All white? All burgundy? Throwback to 1994? They have too many combos to call one of them iconic, IMO.

Italic number Steelers takes away from the iconic status, again, in my mind. That strikes me as a significant change (moreso than the logo on the front). 

 

Cowboys - yeah, probably belong on the list, but yuck to the mismatched colors.

 

 

Re: Redskins and Steelers. Great points on both accounts that I hadn't considered.

 

IMO I think there are indeed too many Redskins variations to pinpoint them as iconic. With the Steelers, the number font may or may not take points away. But, IMO it isn't enough to remove iconic status from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Digby said:

I think Boston's current City Hall isn't great but also isn't as bad as people think. The problem is that it's placed on an urban renewal block, surrounded by a truly awful expansive brick plaza, surrounded by other government buildings in a similar style ... it feels like the entire block was a spite fence. That this happened across the street from Haymarket and Quincy Market and other classic Old Boston things was really a bad idea.

 

Honestly, I find the government service center to be worse than City Hall (which I find awful). Most pictures really don't do it justice how ugly the building is since it's kind of hard to see all the awful texturing of the building. The bottom photo is a better representation of what the building looks like.

443f2ecc0a66cc786daf3b03e0e5ef62.jpg?fit=crop&auto=compress,format&w=1200

 

vmfzHQrYZXE3wR35s0xkUA03ZUNIB20XpLf1l2VRSrD_RB8tLbcBh2IwPbP-9cE5LGucnmQU6c1jFJfsza7yxu6IKt6YrHM2tr6dMMh9dBko5VTdPei-_ZgkOJNKL8JFnLOttth7AiaZPJVVR_0r34yPgKtAEgxhqophT_mCyGZljM19PnkrCf5l-Uirmyq-zAN1Nwd8LZPU6t9WzCZg9SwVoKN_bRJQNCkgDqE

 

That whole area of Boston is interesting because it's a great example of the city's terrible decisions in the 1960s and 1970s, as well as its really great decisions in the 90s and 2000s. Even the Garden, which itself is a concrete nightmare has undergone extensive renovations to look pretty nice and actually like a part of the surrounding city (at least on one side).

 

100319causewayar04.jpg?w=525

 

I've got a dribbble, check it out if you like my stuff; alternatively, if you hate my stuff, send it to your enemies to punish their insolence!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's been a real nice relief. I can't believe the old Garden site was nothing but a parking lot for 20+ years, though I guess no one could really tell until they tore down the elevated Green Line. Too bad they built and renovated all that just in time for it to sit empty for a year.

Showcasing fan-made sports apparel by artists and designers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.