ManillaToad 1,358 Posted January 1 1 hour ago, dont care said: They like (or atleast pretend to like) the team's fans are the same way. i feel sorry for them 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LogoFan 375 Posted January 7 On 12/23/2020 at 8:40 AM, PlayGloria said: This is a perfect example of the biggest issue with the Rams new set. It's not really about the new set being total garbage (which it is) but it's more about not living up to the standards that the Rams should and could have aesthetically. If the Jags or the Panthers put out a set in the realm of what the Rams just did, oh well. It's bad but it's not like they had a stout uniform history. But this is the RAMS. I remember as a kid collecting the gumball machine NFL helmets. The horn was so iconic. It's a shame really. I didn't like the Rams' new unis when they were rolled out. Seeing them on the field only made it worse. They are just God-awful. It thought I might like the lighter blue but the helmets are too shiny, the highlighter-yellow gets lost and the "bone" just looks like a dirty uniform. And those gel-looking numbers...WTF awful. While I didn't mind the early 2000's rework, the current set is best for the crapper. The new ones made me immediately yearn for the classic look again. Just...ugh. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WSU151 10,100 Posted January 7 5 minutes ago, LogoFan said: The highlighter-yellow gets lost Does it though? I don't think I've ever watched a Rams game this year and wondered where the yellow went, especially on the helmet and home uni. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanMcD29 861 Posted January 7 1 hour ago, WSU151 said: Does it though? I don't think I've ever watched a Rams game this year and wondered where the yellow went, especially on the helmet and home uni. Eh, there's been a couple of games where the yellow horns looked white in the standard TV view. Hasn't been an issue on the uniforms but I was surprised it was that much of an issue on the helmet. Guess that's what I get for thinking that making the helmets royal blue was the only good part about this rebrand 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TenaciousG 911 Posted January 7 I mean, it is probably the all-time coolest football helmet design (The Ram horns). They didn’t need to reinvent the wheel on the unis. Why even have a gradient to white on the home numbers if you’re just going to Bone everything else? 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ramsjetsthunder 1,354 Posted January 9 Oh, these are BAD. Never thought I'd be wishing they'd have gone mono-Bone. Wouldn't be quite as bad if the socks contrasted, I have no idea why this yoga pants look is a trend EDIT: Ok, looking at them in play from a distance, they're not as bad as when they go up close. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 20,971 Posted January 9 It's ridiculous that the pants have a gradient stripe that is white on top - right against the bone. How was there no thought put into the mixing and matching? It's easy to say that they weren't designed with that in mind, and fine - that's likely the case - but everyone knew from day one that they'd do it anyway. 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
8BW14 1,406 Posted January 9 Is it just me or do the Rams jerseys look particularly dingy in Seattle today? The white panel in the sleeve is more visible than usual for some reason. I don’t know ifs the camera or the Seattle light. Cripes, do I hate the Rams for :censored:ing up what should have been an easy uniform update. 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lahaye7 587 Posted January 9 finally getting to see the Rams on my new fancy TV. Their blue looks so good...and the bone looks so like old burlap sacks. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sec19Row53 4,068 Posted January 9 Somebody send the team some Oxi-clean, please. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 1,053 Posted January 9 The white gradient makes the Rams’ bone and Seattle’s gray numbers look like they put the whites and colors in the same wash. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gosioux76 2,595 Posted January 9 12 minutes ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: The white gradient makes the Rams’ bone and Seattle’s gray numbers look like they put the whites and colors in the same wash. Exactly. The bone up close almost has a faint peach hue to it. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DG_ThenNowForever 16,743 Posted January 9 I think the Rams look sweet today. But also think the overall aesthetic is pretty drab. The all-blue Hawks always look better against teams wearing white. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DNAsports 6,182 Posted January 9 I don’t know how to feel about this combination. I hate the leotard look, but this is also one of their better looks. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gosioux76 2,595 Posted January 9 30 minutes ago, DG_ThenNowForever said: I think the Rams look sweet today. But also think the overall aesthetic is pretty drab. The all-blue Hawks always look better against teams wearing white. Which team is wearing white? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 20,971 Posted January 9 It's funny that Nike had a... wait for it... boner this off season, and didn't push the obvious move and try to influence the Browns to swap white for bone. It would look great with either of their tops, and would be nice as pants color to wear with either top. They could eliminate white from everything. We don't know that Nike didn't bring this to the Browns, but that would have made a lot more sense than bringing it to a team in Los goddam Angeles. 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DNAsports 6,182 Posted January 9 16 minutes ago, BBTV said: It's funny that Nike had a... wait for it... boner this off season, and didn't push the obvious move and try to influence the Browns to swap white for bone. It would look great with either of their tops, and would be nice as pants color to wear with either top. They could eliminate white from everything. We don't know that Nike didn't bring this to the Browns, but that would have made a lot more sense than bringing it to a team in Los goddam Angeles. I’d be okay with Nike giving Washington a shrug towards bone/off-white over white. Chances are that no matter what name they choose to go with, Washington’s uniforms will likely retain a traditional look to them. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 20,971 Posted January 9 I don't know if I'd like bone + yellow, so I'mma have to say no to WFT getting boned. In a world in which some team needed a bone, Cleveland makes the most sense, followed by nobody. I think the Cardinals could work in bone with a redesign, but they'd have to go with bone domes too, and I'm not sure how that would look. My gut says matte bone might be awesome and match well with bone fabrics... and it could just as easily be a disaster. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DG_ThenNowForever 16,743 Posted January 9 1 hour ago, gosioux76 said: Which team is wearing white? Neither, which is why I said the overall aesthetic was drab today. Thought that was clear. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 20,971 Posted January 9 Didn't you get a bone jersey? How's it look IRL? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
