Jump to content

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unveil New Uniforms


tBBP

Recommended Posts

On 2/17/2020 at 3:07 PM, oldschoolvikings said:

 

Jealous?

 

Nah, I've got them in a right place ;)

 

On 2/17/2020 at 3:32 PM, Ridleylash said:

Why don't you have testicles on your chin? 😜

 

I've got beard on my chin :P

 

On 2/17/2020 at 6:01 PM, Sport said:

I don't see it. 

 

Good for you! :)

4r2eer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, MCM0313 said:

I don’t think there’s any silver in there except for the chrome facemask. Those numbers are metallic pewter similar to the helmet. Amazing how Nike can make metallic numerals but not jerseys or pants. 

These pants are still pretty metallic, spacer.png

Excellent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those are actually still the old pants, believe it or not. There have been a few teams that have been holdouts on the Nike template (Raiders, Packers, for example), and I believe the Cowboys were on that list, at least for their pants. 

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Volt said:

You know, it's a shame....if not for the stupid number font, the Bucs can look terrific in their current sets.  If they would've done something less outlandish with the font - the application itself is pretty cool - and avoided the use of TV numbers (does the NFL allow that?), there'd be no need to change these, when worn right.   Pewter/Red/Pewter/Red and Pewter/White/Pewter/White are fantastic, but that number font just eliminates all that is good about these and automatically everyone dismisses them as being terrible, just because of the font.

 

629168228.jpg.0.jpg

1066272656.jpeg&c=sc&w=3200&h=2271

 

The other problem with these besides the number font and obnoxiously big helmet logo (that was "cleaned up" but actually downgraded), is that theres too much pewter and on matte fabric and it never looks pewter, depending on the lighting it looks either brown or anthracite.

 

Then there's the Bucs on one sleeve and ship logo on the other (this sucks for the Lions too) and not to mention the ship logo is botched since it has the mast in front of the sale in the back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2020 at 10:38 AM, MDGP said:

 

They literally have to, it's the law. Holding the vote and then ignoring what the shareholders want is called "defrauding the shareholders" and is an extremely serious crime that has zero consequences because America doesn't prosecute white collar crimes.

 

no we prosecute them, we just pardon the MFs afterwards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TBGKon said:

Personally I think the sword is too gimmicky.

You might be right, but they look unique at least with those swordpants, like the Bengal-pants.
I think Bucs should focus on 3 colors and remove the yellow/orange from the palette. I think it is poorly executed to pay homage to their throwback-theme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Demonkah said:

You might be right, but they look unique at least with those swordpants, like the Bengal-pants.
I think Bucs should focus on 3 colors and remove the yellow/orange from the palette. I think it is poorly executed to pay homage to their throwback-theme

 

As far as audacious gimmicks go, it fits in as a stripe pretty well. The hilt is a lot easier to ignore than, say, a "BROWNS" wordmark.  The fact of it being a gimmick is more jarring than the appearance itself.  So nice concept at least, I'd say.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about how some teams warrant true clash sets, unrelated to their usual palette.  Main example is the Miami Heat vice look.  Other examples are teams with varied historical looks.  Cavs orange/blue, St Louis Hawks baby blue/red, perhaps even White Sox RWB. Any other good examples? Canucks gold/black/red?

 

These are situations where mashing them together in one pallette doesn't quite work. Prime example Chargers Navy and baby blue.  That being said, I feel like a creamsicle alt would work with a red/blue pallette swap. The coexistence of pewter is separate question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, chakfu said:

I've been thinking about how some teams warrant true clash sets, unrelated to their usual palette. 

I don't know about that but the NFL should have a uniform czar that prevents things like the Chiefs (red, white, red) vs the Bengals (orange, orange, white) from happening. Visually jarring. Happens other times too ie (Seahawks: navy, white, navy vs Bears: navy, navy, white). There should be a degree of separation that is a bit more clearly visible. 

 

In the case below I'd say...

A. Bengals wear black jersey

B. Chiefs wear white pants

 

usatsi_8842710.jpg?w=1000&h=600&crop=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, FiddySicks said:

I think those are actually still the old pants, believe it or not. There have been a few teams that have been holdouts on the Nike template (Raiders, Packers, for example), and I believe the Cowboys were on that list, at least for their pants. 

Cowboys pants still old manufacturer except for color rush i believe. Previously held out on jerseys till after the toilet collar template was ditched. I think the Pats are on that list too of holdouts unless that changed in recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.