Bill0813 Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 Mods, if you want to lock this to replies also.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmackNCheese Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 If nothing else, this is a great opportunity to replace one of the most dull identities in baseball. I see it as a win-win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 Plus a team with historical names to draw on, it looks like Spiders is #1 according to the odds makers. They can maintain the block C while adding an alternate logo with spider. I've always liked the Richmond identity and this could be similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GriffinM6 Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 Spiders or Guardians are my picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 Earl's (Earl Averill) Lumberjacks (Forest City nickname) Blues Napoleons (Nap LaJoie) Buckeyes (Negro League team) Rapids (Bob Feller) Buckeyes probably won't happen due to the success of Ohio State teams, but I like Earls or Lumberjacks. I don't like Spiders but I have a feeling they'll be what's picked if a name change happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Akronite- Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 Commodores Blues Spiders Those are my tops, with "Rocks" or simply "Cleveland Baseball Club" also feeling acceptable. Not into "Guardians" or "Baseball Browns" Hope they follow through. This could be an opportunity to breathe life into a dulling brand and, hopefully, bring some much needed new colors into the MLB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_DietDrPepper_ Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 I would hope Spiders is what's chosen, despite its pitiful history, it would make for one of the more interesting brands in sports hopefully Follow the NFA, and My Baseball League here: https://ahsports.boardhost.com/index.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 In order of my preference: Spiders Dobys (for Larry Doby, the most important player in team history - the first African-American in the AL who is so unfairly ignored) Forests Commodores Guardians Rocks/Rockers Barons (the old NHL name, just ask the Sharks or Stars or the NHL for the trademark) Owls (just because it'd be nice for one Big Four team to have that name) Founders (for being a founding franchise of the American League) MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 24 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said: In order of my preference: Spiders Dobys (for Larry Doby, the most important player in team history - the first African-American in the AL who is so unfairly ignored) Forests Commodores Guardians Rocks/Rockers Barons (the old NHL name, just ask the Sharks or Stars or the NHL for the trademark) Owls (just because it'd be nice for one Big Four team to have that name) Founders (for being a founding franchise of the American League) Good callout, Dobys would be a great choice as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridleylash Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 Spiders is the obvious choice, here, but I do actually think the name "Blues" is a good shout as a nod to the long history the rhythm and blues genre has with Cleveland, and a nod to the city's past in the MLB; plus, a musically-themed identity is something no other MLB team has. The only quibble might by if St. Louis over in the NHL would play hardball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TenaciousG Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 I’ve always appreciated how tight of a relationship the Spokane Indians have with the Spokane tribe... if the Cleveland Indians partner with a local tribe in the same way I don’t see an issue with the name. It’s insane to me how long Chief Wahoo lasted... clearly a caricature and I’m not sure why some people were playing the history card when the team is historically quite bad and possibly even cursed (blown two WS Game 7s). My teamsNCAA: Washington StateMLB: Seattle MarinersNFL: Seattle SeahawksNBA: Portland TrailblazersEPL: Liverpool FCMLS: Seattle Sounders FCNHL: Pittsburgh Penguins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghost316 Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 36 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said: In order of my preference: Spiders Dobys (for Larry Doby, the most important player in team history - the first African-American in the AL who is so unfairly ignored) Forests Commodores Guardians Rocks/Rockers Barons (the old NHL name, just ask the Sharks or Stars or the NHL for the trademark) Owls (just because it'd be nice for one Big Four team to have that name) Founders (for being a founding franchise of the American League) I bet designers/brand developers would love to get their hooks into the Rockers/Rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
officeglenn Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 Again, I appreciate the civility of this conversation so far. But as with the Washington NFL franchise, we can have a thread if and when a change is made. Otherwise, the forum rule stands of no discussion of indigenous team naming controversies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beachperroAZ Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 On 11/7/2020 at 2:25 PM, SFGiants58 said: I'm so pleased! I don't think its this hard to have something in by 2021. All they gotta do is rebrand as the spiders with a color scheme that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkerws Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 11 minutes ago, beachperroAZ said: I don't think its this hard to have something in by 2021. All they gotta do is rebrand as the spiders with a color scheme that makes sense. If there was an approved design in house now, yeah it would be easy. Then you go start cutting material and sewing and maybe if you work around the clock the # of uniforms could be presented and actual players in the uniform could be shown. Without an approved logo set, it’s easier to just roll with what you have and the ownership and MLB would need to make a dedicated schedule for the replacement name and logos. When you think about it, maybe that 2 year process isn’t so extended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beachperroAZ Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 1 minute ago, walkerws said: If there was an approved design in house now, yeah it would be easy. Then you go start cutting material and sewing and maybe if you work around the clock the # of uniforms could be presented and actual players in the uniform could be shown. Without an approved logo set, it’s easier to just roll with what you have and the ownership and MLB would need to make a dedicated schedule for the replacement name and logos. When you think about it, maybe that 2 year process isn’t so extended. If the Indians had smart ownership this would have been started at the moment they decided Indians was not appropriate. But since they dragged their feet on whether or not they wanted to change the name they lost more time. They could also do a Pilot/Brewer for a year and slap on a spiders woodmark on the front of the current jerseys for a year as a placeholder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 There’s an easy stopgap - just slap the “Cleveland” wordmark on the home uniform (red outlined in navy) and the red jersey. The block C alone is too Cincinnati for them. MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkerws Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 On 12/11/2020 at 12:33 PM, SFGiants58 said: There’s an easy stopgap - just slap the “Cleveland” wordmark on the home uniform (red outlined in navy) and the red jersey. The block C alone is too Cincinnati for them. I agree. I would use the cursive Cleveland script just because it isn't so bland. Maybe even use throwback Cleveland scripts to mix it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 On 12/11/2020 at 11:05 AM, beachperroAZ said: If the Indians had smart ownership this would have been started at the moment they decided Indians was not appropriate. But since they dragged their feet on whether or not they wanted to change the name they lost more time. They could also do a Pilot/Brewer for a year and slap on a spiders woodmark on the front of the current jerseys for a year as a placeholder. Notification of intent to change for the following season has to be in to MLB by March 31st and those changes submitted by May 31st (I believe it's the 31st in both situations, not the 1st but I could be wrong). They were well past both of those deadlines at the time any potential change was being discussed. Other than dropping "Indians" and going simply by "Cleveland" ala the Washington Football Team, they couldn't have changed the name and/or uniforms in advance of 2021. Not to mention, why would you wanna rush a complete identity change? You're not just changing for the next season, but rather, the intent is forever. From a branding standpoint, you want to make sure you have everything right as best as possible. https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GelatinousLimes Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 Cleveland Baseball Club. Simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.