phutmasterflex 1,193 Posted February 17 4 minutes ago, PaleVermilion81 said: Raiders do this too. What works well for the Raiders is that it is noticeable on the sleeves but not so much on the body part of the jersey because it's black. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBGKon 2,654 Posted February 17 3 hours ago, SFGiants58 said: Swap the teal for dark red, then use dark red numbers on the white jersey and add a one-color pants stripe. Congrats, you have what the Cardinals should be wearing from the neck down. Ah, good thought. The idea is good, but for the wrong team. Cards would be a great idea. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DPHF 294 Posted February 17 16 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said: I'd call that less 'interesting' than missing the point - that doesn't address the lack of colors in the uniform. I get the point, and I agree with the point. It wasn't a 'gotcha' post. What I find interesting is that they've actually outlined the numbers, but done so with the most lifeless option available to them in each case. Get some teal or gold onto those jerseys! 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NFLfan10 1,213 Posted February 17 The AFC South just got a bit more visually appealing. The Titans need be next and ditch the navy (again). Them and Houston are still way too similar. Regarding the Jags, I'm hoping this inspires yet another rebrand in 2023. Their set is still boring and the road look lacks teal. There's just not much cohesiveness between teal over white and white over black with no truly visible teal elements. I'm wondering how much they'll wear white and black at home now. Hopefully this will minimize white at home and will give us something like (realistically) 1 white, 5 teal, 2 black jersey games. Really hope they wear teal for the San Fran game this season. That will look outstanding. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WSU151 9,778 Posted February 17 42 minutes ago, phutmasterflex said: What works well for the Raiders is that it is noticeable on the sleeves but not so much on the body part of the jersey because it's black. Are the sleeves not black? I mean...it's noticeable in the sun. Not as noticeable in the shade. 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phutmasterflex 1,193 Posted February 17 40 minutes ago, WSU151 said: Are the sleeves not black? I mean...it's noticeable in the sun. Not as noticeable in the shade. I think it's more noticeable on sleeves because the pads make the number curve, which makes it stand out more versus the number on the jersey where it's flat mostly. My point is that it blends better because it's black. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 845 Posted February 17 A simple number outline can do wonders for Jacksonville: 31 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scrumptious Ham 598 Posted February 17 If you're a Jags fan, this off-season is a delight. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DPHF 294 Posted February 17 The Raiders only have/only need black and silver. The Jags are doubling up on the same color while letting other good accent colors go unused. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ManillaToad 1,191 Posted February 17 Home: Away: Alt: No other combos, especially the socks. 19 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PaleVermilion81 2,193 Posted February 17 28 minutes ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: A simple number outline can do wonders for Jacksonville: The problem is that the "gold" would be just a mustard color. We've already seen how Nike translates the Jaguars gold to jerseys. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JayMac 3,814 Posted February 17 Just now, PaleVermilion81 said: The problem is that the "gold" would be just a mustard color. We've already seen how Nike translates the Jaguars gold to jerseys. That's why I'm okay that they do not have any gold on the uniform. Nike cannot/doesn't want to create a metallic gold fabric. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 845 Posted February 17 2 minutes ago, PaleVermilion81 said: The problem is that the "gold" would be just a mustard color. We've already seen how Nike translates the Jaguars gold to jerseys. 1 minute ago, JayMac said: That's why I'm okay that they do not have any gold on the uniform. Nike cannot/doesn't want to create a metallic gold fabric. The Ravens don’t have that problem 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PaleVermilion81 2,193 Posted February 17 4 minutes ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: The Ravens don’t have that problem It's still a little mustard-ish, but they also have the benefit of pairing it next to a dark purple. It gives a much better contrast. Paired with teal it loses the contrast. Edit: adding in a photo of the Ravens "gold" pants as it shows how mustard the gold is. 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DPHF 294 Posted February 17 Ew gross, Jimmy Clausen. 11 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldschoolvikings 17,928 Posted February 17 2 hours ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: A simple number outline can do wonders for Jacksonville: Ehh... No thanks. 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phutmasterflex 1,193 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, PaleVermilion81 said: The problem is that the "gold" would be just a mustard color. We've already seen how Nike translates the Jaguars gold to jerseys. The gold trim on the number looks more like gold (matching that patch) versus the one on the shoulder which is more mustard. I do think that if it is part of the number like this, then adding it as a trim to the jersey number can work. It sucks that they had gold prominently featured in their identity in their last and to basically now having no gold except for the helmet logo. I wouldn't be surprised if after the 5-year waiting period is up the Jags will change their uniforms again. Their current set was the brainchild of Tom Coughlin's desire to simplify and kinda be like Penn State. Maybe the team wants to move away from that era and hopefully embrace the teal as the primary going forward and bring back some more gold to their uniform. 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruhammydude 707 Posted February 18 On 2/15/2021 at 12:53 PM, oldschoolvikings said: Each of the 3 current ones would all look better with more of their secondary color: Buccaneers: Eliminate black, stay with red/pewter/orange or switch to red/pewter/silver, reintroduces stripes on the jerseys. Ohio State: Wear the 1968 throwbacks full time. Lions: Change the dark gray on the jersey to silver, I'm fine with the stripes not having silver The Seahawks and Cowboys are different examples but I still think they would both looks better with more splash of color. With the teams heavily relying on jersey sales and not pants or helmet sales, why would you not include your secondary color on your jersey? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruhammydude 707 Posted February 18 Also, Hallelujah! The Jaguars finally went back to teal! 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruhammydude 707 Posted February 18 Unpopular Opinion Time: The Jaguars should wear teal jerseys and teal pants as their primary uniforms. It creates a nice symmetry when with the black socks, and honestly, I'm a big sucker for the teal they use. Here's what I think they should wear, all with black socks. Teal Jerseys/Teal Pants: ~4 home games a year Teal Jerseys/White Pants: ~2 home games a year White Jerseys/Teal Pants: ~6 road games a year White Jerseys/White Pants: ~2 road games a year, maybe at home but the teal is light enough to be worn in warm weather Black Jerseys/Teal Pants: ~2 home games a year Black Jerseys/White Pants: Never, its too black heavy. Burn the black pants too. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
