Claystation360 734 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 19 hours ago, selgy said: The "aquafresh" pipping was terrible I hated that uniform, the piping had no point. Also I was never gonna like it with what it replaced. When it happened the talk was ownership made the move because it was a cheaper uniform as a money saving option. I still miss the prowler. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
phutmasterflex 1,286 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 The issue with that aquafresh piping was that it went through so many changes under Reebok depending on what kind of template was used. And for players like MJD, he wore all three. A design function that can't translate well through different players on the same team is not good. 20 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AFirestormToPurify 399 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Wow the first version was actually not that bad imo. Still missing a bit of gold but it looks alright 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 7,238 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 8 minutes ago, AFirestormToPurify said: Wow the first version was actually not that bad imo. Still missing a bit of gold but it looks alright They’re all the same version, just different cuts that they couldn’t/wouldn’t make the stripes the same across the cuts and templates. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
O.C.D 624 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 3 hours ago, phutmasterflex said: The issue with that aquafresh piping was that it went through so many changes under Reebok depending on what kind of template was used. And for players like MJD, he wore all three. A design function that can't translate well through different players on the same team is not good. Your point is right on. The striping was very inconsistent. Over the past decade NFL uniforms look cheap. From quality of design to fabric and uniform cuts. I think the league has tried to sell cost cutting measures as progressive uniform design. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 7,238 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 3 hours ago, O.C.D said: Your point is right on. The striping was very inconsistent. Over the past decade NFL uniforms look cheap. From quality of design to fabric and uniform cuts. I think the league has tried to sell cost cutting measures as progressive uniform design. What are you going off about? How are using seamless, form fitting, moisture wicking, lighter, stronger fabrics cheap and cost cutting? 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WSU151 10,313 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 6 hours ago, O.C.D said: Your point is right on. The striping was very inconsistent. Over the past decade NFL uniforms look cheap. From quality of design to fabric and uniform cuts. I think the league has tried to sell cost cutting measures as progressive uniform design. The striping was inconsistent on Reebok jerseys, which haven’t been worn for a decade. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DNAsports 6,621 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 hour ago, WSU151 said: The striping was inconsistent on Reebok jerseys, which haven’t been worn for a decade. Exhibit B 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 21,468 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Wentz asked Michael Pittman if he could buy #11 from him and Pittman refused (he apparently told the story while playing video games on twitch) and Wentz said it didn’t matter because he was going to change anyway. So it didn’t matter because he was going to change anyway, but he asked about buying it - which is it? Dude is such a bad liar. He’s such a baby he probably won’t throw to Pittman now and will work behind the scenes to get him traded. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
plastictaxicab 48 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 12 hours ago, daniel75 said: I’ve forgotten are the Cardinals and Bengals getting new threads? The Bengals have been confirmed. There's a thread but it hasn't been touched in days, since there hasn't been many updates/speculation/leaks. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gosioux76 2,731 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 hour ago, BBTV said: Wentz asked Michael Pittman if he could buy #11 from him and Pittman refused (he apparently told the story while playing video games on twitch) and Wentz said it didn’t matter because he was going to change anyway. So it didn’t matter because he was going to change anyway, but he asked about buying it - which is it? Dude is such a bad liar. He’s such a baby he probably won’t throw to Pittman now and will work behind the scenes to get him traded. The way the Indianapolis Star reported it, Wentz asked whether Pittman was willing to give up the number. Pittman said he wanted to keep it, Wentz basically said "OK, cool." Pittman then called Wentz a "great dude" for being respectful and asking. Not exactly sure how this translates into Wentz being a liar and a baby. Quote "(Wentz) asked me how locked in I am on No. 11," Pittman said, referencing a conversation with his new quarterback. "I told him I'm pretty locked in. He said, 'Alright, that's fine. I'm going to change anyway.' "I'm staying No. 11." On a TMZ Sports video posted Monday, Pittman added of his conversation: "It went really well. He's a cool guy. Didn't try to press me. He asked me respectfully and I appreciate him for that. He's a great dude. Lots of guys with his status would come in and demand (their number). I think he's a really great dude and I get to keep 11. "I don't think there is any deal that's going to be done. I wouldn't feel right taking money from someone over a football number." SOURCE: Indianapolis Star 13 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 21,468 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 If you’re changing anyway, then why ask the guy how locked-in he is? He obviously wasn’t planning on changing anyway. It’s admittedly nit picky, but considering how he behaved here whenever he didn’t get his way, I’m sure he’s plotting Pittman’s trade or release. I mean not really, but not not really. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MJWalker45 6,287 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 minute ago, BBTV said: If you’re changing anyway, then why ask the guy how locked-in he is? He obviously wasn’t planning on changing anyway. It’s admittedly nit picky, but considering how he behaved here whenever he didn’t get his way, I’m sure he’s plotting Pittman’s trade or release. I mean not really, but not not really. since it's Pittman speaking and not Wentz, he's probably paraphrasing the discussion. I know Wentz didn't leave on the best of terms, but kicking him in the shins on the way out the door just seems like sour grapes. So does Wentz go with 13 or do people forget Andrew Luck existed and give him 12? 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PaleVermilion81 2,451 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 28 minutes ago, BBTV said: If you’re changing anyway, then why ask the guy how locked-in he is? He obviously wasn’t planning on changing anyway. It’s admittedly nit picky, but considering how he behaved here whenever he didn’t get his way, I’m sure he’s plotting Pittman’s trade or release. I mean not really, but not not really. Because it's better to ask than assume? Maybe Wentz went in to the conversation assuming he was going to have to change his number, but figured he'd ask just in case Pittman was open to it. I feel like that is a pretty normal way to go about things. You assume you have to go with Plan B, but why not just confirm whether or not Plan A is possible first rather than assuming it isn't. 15 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ptaylor 232 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 It's better to assume the worst about players and people and their intentions. Right? 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DNAsports 6,621 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I’d like to see Wentz go with 2. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AgentColon2 2,577 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 minute ago, DNAsports said: I’d like to see Wentz go with 2. Good call. His number should reflect his play style. 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DNAsports 6,621 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, AgentColon2 said: Good call. His number should reflect his play style. I mean, I had different reasonings behind it... 1+1=2 Indianapolis being his 2nd team 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WSU151 10,313 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 hour ago, BBTV said: If you’re changing anyway, then why ask the guy how locked-in he is? 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AgentColon2 2,577 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 58 minutes ago, DNAsports said: I mean, I had different reasonings behind it... 1+1=2 Indianapolis being his 2nd team Oh I got it. I just didn’t want to miss an opportunity to say he plays like poop. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.