DouglasQuaid Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 While watching highlights of the 2004 wild card game between Seattle and the rams, I noticed that I really like both uniform designs from that era. The colors are unique, the style is consistent, and no monochrome. I love the rams font as its not too reliant on a gimmick and the stripes on Seattle look great. The only thing a dont like is logo patches on the sleeves. Sure, their classic looks are much better, but these are darn good. They're two great uniform sets, during a bad era for NFL uniforms. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 What do you mean these aren’t monochrome? These are the definition of monochrome. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DouglasQuaid Posted February 27 Author Share Posted February 27 3 hours ago, dont care said: What do you mean these aren’t monochrome? These are the definition of monochrome. Seattle technically isn't monochrome because they have contrasting navy socks. I think monochrome is all one color. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Those Rams uniforms were terrific up and until they added white and blue pants. They never needed to go away from the gold pants. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the admiral Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Getting rid of the gold pants unwittingly made a distinction between the GSoT and the 2007-2011 Rams, who were maybe the worst show on turf. The Rams in all navy felt like a moribund team, a spent force. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 4 hours ago, DouglasQuaid said: Seattle technically isn't monochrome because they have contrasting navy socks. I think monochrome is all one color. It’s still monochrome, jersey, pants and even the helmet are all the same color. the socks are just separating it for looking like unitards. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 8 hours ago, DouglasQuaid said: Seattle technically isn't monochrome because they have contrasting navy socks. I think monochrome is all one color. Pants and jersey same color = monochrome. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZapRowsdower8 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 This is still my favorite look for Seattle. The unique shade of blue with just a hint of neon green and the navy socks = chef kiss. I'm not a monochrome guy either! As for the Rams, this is probably an unpopular opinion, but I think this is when they looked their best. They fairly quickly destroyed the look with the white and blue pants. I always hated how the helmet and jersey blues didn't match in the classic Rams look, if they had it would have been my number one instead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old School Fool Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 I realized why I wasn't that into Seahawks old look, they constantly wore all white on the road and that sucked. They should have worn colored pants on the road 90% of the time, it made them look super unique. That shade of blue with the metallic finish is awesome. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.